Garfunkle — CS2 Stats

76561198133181861[U:1:172916133]

1,484Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,295Purple band · top ~15.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12799 of 25079 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 938 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,295Peak Premier on CSDB
938Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 938
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 113 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,295
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,705 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGarfunkleFACEITLevel 3 · 938 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER18,295 · Purple bandPEAK ELO938csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning50
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40537Last 10040%Win rateWWWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression7.8
Utility5.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time589ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — shelter 6–1
133Biggest win — italy
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
92In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

shelterBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC135838%-0.01
officeC135838%-0.01
nukeC114736%-0.01
ancientD103730%-0.02
mirageD92722%-0.03
infernoC94544%-0.02
dust2C73443%-0.01
anubisD62433%-0.03
shelterA53260%-0.00
vertigo31233%0.01
train31233%-0.01
overpass32167%-0.02
boulder21150%-0.05
fachwerk21150%-0.01
eldorado21150%-0.04
italy110100%0.03
debris110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

168Matches
49%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
83.8ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1443%0.7413.2
Inferno1155%0.9515.4
Anubis1136%1.0316.3
Overpass850%0.9916.0
Nuke560%1.0116.6
Dust2560%0.9917.0
Cache250%1.1021.0
Ancient1100%1.0010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
606msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
12.03HE damage / grenade
11.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1941% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0511%24 Aug
office13–9-0.0323%23 Aug
dust213–80.0425%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0310%22 Aug
vertigo13–40.1016%18 Aug
train8–13-0.0138%7 Aug
boulder13–6-0.0810%4 Aug
ancient0–3-0.080%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0019%4 Aug
ancient7–13-0.019%3 Aug
office13–9-0.0223%2 Aug
office13–70.0521%2 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0313%2 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0217%1 Aug
cache6–13-0.0412%29 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0511%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0527%29 Jul
office8–13-0.068%28 Jul
cache5–13-0.0421%28 Jul
ancient16–140.0413%27 Jul
office9–130.0316%26 Jul
office12–12-0.0128%26 Jul
italy13–30.0329%26 Jul
shelter5–13-0.0430%25 Jul
nuke13–100.0150%25 Jul
shelter13–110.0519%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0631%24 Jul
cache7–13-0.0218%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0010%22 Jul
cache2–13-0.104%22 Jul
office4–13-0.0353%22 Jul
anubis12–160.0317%21 Jul
anubis13–11-0.029%21 Jul
office13–110.0531%17 Jul
shelter6–10.105%17 Jul
fachwerk13–110.0224%16 Jul
cache10–13-0.0621%16 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0214%15 Jul
ancient10–130.0015%15 Jul
mirage12–120.0130%15 Jul
cache11–130.0522%15 Jul
cache13–80.0127%14 Jul
mirage13–30.0419%14 Jul
eldorado5–9-0.0517%14 Jul
office7–13-0.0216%13 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0017%12 Jul
cache13–9-0.079%11 Jul
shelter13–11-0.0426%11 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0321%11 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0527%11 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0913%11 Jul
mirage13–9-0.070%11 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0921%10 Jul
inferno16–13-0.037%10 Jul
nuke13–30.0328%10 Jul
eldorado9–3-0.046%10 Jul
debris9–60.0511%10 Jul
cache13–70.0529%9 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0813%9 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0515%9 Jul
fachwerk12–12-0.0319%9 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0320%9 Jul
shelter8–13-0.0720%9 Jul
train3–13-0.0410%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.029%8 Jul
inferno5–9-0.0110%5 Jul
cache13–70.0428%4 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0018%4 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0520%4 Jul
cache7–13-0.0354%4 Jul
office13–9-0.0235%3 Jul
ancient13–60.039%3 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1112%3 Jul
dust213–80.0420%2 Jul
inferno0–9-0.2917%2 Jul
inferno9–20.0527%2 Jul
inferno8–80.0821%2 Jul
mirage12–120.0323%2 Jul
office3–13-0.0515%2 Jul
dust211–13-0.0217%1 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0111%1 Jul
ancient9–130.0221%1 Jul
nuke7–130.0125%28 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0720%28 Jun
dust26–13-0.0716%28 Jun
inferno13–110.0310%24 Jun
dust29–13-0.059%24 Jun
anubis9–13-0.018%24 Jun
office12–120.0217%24 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0114%23 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0810%23 Jun
overpass13–90.0210%23 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0521%21 Jun
office5–13-0.0318%21 Jun
dust28–130.0321%21 Jun
train13–50.0323%21 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0112%20 Jun
inferno9–50.0214%19 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0521%18 Jun
mirage5–130.0110%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →