Petrov Petrushkovych — CS2 Stats

PL76561198317597613[U:1:357331885]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

458Tracked matches58%Win rate2021Tracked since

949Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 3 · 699 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	31.4%	42.2%	42.7%	11.3% short
Shot accuracy	13.9%	11.9%	10.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.93	0.98	1.00	0.07 short
Match win rate	42.8%	43.6%	44.1%	1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning35

Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–46–10Last 10044%Win rateWWWTTLLTTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression5.0

Utility1.8

Positioning3.5

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning3.5

Utility1.8

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact7.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time651ms−31ms

first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms

Headshot accuracy17.6%+6.4%

first ⅓ avg 11.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–2

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 38% over 39

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	39	15–24	38%	-0.01
mirage	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.04
inferno	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.05
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.03
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.04
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.05
ancient	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.00
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.06
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 39). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,827Lifetime kills

0.93K/D

2,985Matches

42.8%Match win rate

31.4%Headshot %

13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players

7,908MVPs

949Hours (in match)

2,353Bombs planted

352Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP15,109

AK-476,742

M4A4 / M4A1-S3,839

SSG 082,772

Desert Eagle2,202

P2000 / USP-S2,188

Glock-181,640

P901,325

Knife1,320

P2501,208

Lifetime map wins

3,466dust2

1,780inferno

1,777nuke

528cbble

483vertigo

379train

178office

100lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches

48%Win rate

0.75Avg K/D

67.9ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win

12%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	42	45%	0.71	11.2
Nuke	16	38%	0.76	12.3
Anubis	15	47%	0.78	11.7
Dust2	15	53%	0.84	14.1
Inferno	11	55%	0.59	11.7
Ancient	7	86%	0.85	14.0
Train	3	33%	0.57	10.7
Overpass	2	50%	1.45	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.1%Spray accuracy

78.5%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

653msReaction time

28.7%T opening success

38.7%CT opening success

0.33Enemies flashed / flash

3.2%Flash assists

5.08HE damage / grenade

8.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3277 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.7393% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 39 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	-0.01	3%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	23%	26 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	44%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.11	29%	24 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	17%	24 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.06	18%	24 Aug →
overpass	12–12	0.07	19%	23 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.05	21%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–2	0.01	21%	23 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	7%	23 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.01	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	26%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	18%	20 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	21%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.05	13%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	18%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	13%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	0%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	16%	8 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.02	12%	8 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	16%	8 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	9%	8 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.08	6%	22 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.08	17%	21 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.02	25%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.04	20%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.00	20%	21 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	12%	19 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.12	33%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.04	28%	19 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	11%	17 Jun →
vertigo	6–9	-0.06	16%	15 Jun →
nuke	8–8	-0.17	14%	15 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	20%	15 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	8%	15 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	0%	14 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	17%	8 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	10%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.08	19%	8 Jun →
inferno	3–9	-0.12	16%	7 Jun →
inferno	6–9	-0.09	33%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	20%	7 Jun →
dust2	0–13	-0.09	21%	7 Jun →
inferno	4–9	-0.12	18%	7 Jun →
inferno	9–3	0.05	18%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	4%	3 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	25%	2 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	19%	2 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.02	11%	2 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	22%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.06	0%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.08	20%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.02	14%	1 Jun →
anubis	16–13	-0.03	16%	1 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.11	11%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	13%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.09	12%	31 May →
mirage	13–4	0.06	14%	29 May →
dust2	13–10	0.02	21%	29 May →
dust2	1–13	0.03	12%	28 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	21%	28 May →
dust2	4–13	0.02	50%	26 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	21%	23 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	16%	21 May →
inferno	0–9	-0.30	0%	21 May →
vertigo	9–7	-0.06	10%	21 May →
nuke	5–9	-0.12	13%	21 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	12%	20 May →
dust2	8–13	0.08	26%	20 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	0%	20 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	0%	20 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	14%	17 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	19%	17 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	9%	17 May →
dust2	13–2	0.15	13%	11 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	17%	11 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	8%	7 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	11%	7 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	4%	7 May →
dust2	12–12	0.00	12%	7 May →
cache	13–5	-0.04	9%	7 May →
ancient	8–13	0.02	15%	7 May →
dust2	12–12	-0.07	5%	6 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	0%	6 May →
overpass	7–13	-0.08	17%	6 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.09	3%	6 May →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	25%	6 May →
cache	13–1	-0.04	6%	5 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	10%	5 May →
cache	8–13	-0.06	11%	29 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	27%	29 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.01	17%	29 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.02	3%	28 Apr →
anubis	13–11	0.05	11%	28 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	12%	28 Apr →
dust2	12–12	0.04	16%	27 Apr →
italy	8–13	-0.05	8%	22 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.03	4%	22 Apr →