dave — CS2 Stats

76561198316865689[U:1:356599961]✓ No bans

3,488Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,738Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,907 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate59.6%52.8%above
Shot accuracy16.8%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.080.09 short
Match win rate44.0%49.2%5.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdaveFACEITLevel 9 · 1,907 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning51
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41509Last 10041%Win rateWLLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression5.7
Utility2.9
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.1
Utility2.9
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time643ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy36.4%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 40.0% → last ⅓ avg 36.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — overpass 13–4
132Biggest win — office
6Longest win streak
26In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 8% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC1971237%0.01
dust2D121118%-0.01
cacheB126650%-0.01
mirageD93633%0.02
infernoC73443%-0.02
ancientS64267%-0.00
shelterD62433%-0.02
italyD51420%-0.01
alpineA53260%0.01
boulder42250%0.00
nuke42250%-0.03
fachwerk31233%0.01
vertigo31233%0.02
train220100%0.01
anubis110100%-0.07
overpass110100%0.14
stronghold110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

244,539Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
10,215Matches
44.0%Match win rate
59.6%Headshot % · Top 10% of tracked players
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
29,041MVPs
4,691Hours (in match)
7,179Bombs planted
5,676Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4798,058
AWP23,903
SG 5536,323
MP92,743
FAMAS2,558

Lifetime map wins

17,106inferno
12,802dust2
9,023nuke
7,359vertigo
6,010train
2,486office
1,888cbble
437italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

670Matches
56%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
64.3ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2737%0.9114.1
Anubis1968%1.0714.7
Ancient1369%0.9312.2
Inferno1164%0.9212.2
Dust21155%0.9312.6
Vertigo1050%0.9012.9
Nuke875%0.9614.6
Cache333%0.8613.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

38.0%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
653msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
52.7%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
0.00HE damage / grenade
6.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3393 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.5339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–20.0458%17 Aug
boulder8–130.0050%15 Aug
dust211–130.0835%15 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0538%13 Aug
cache13–9-0.0337%13 Aug
italy9–13-0.0144%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.1033%12 Aug
dust211–13-0.0136%27 Jul
office6–13-0.0339%27 Jul
shelter10–13-0.0419%26 Jul
fachwerk6–130.0244%26 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0632%24 Jul
shelter11–13-0.0143%23 Jul
boulder0–4-0.070%23 Jul
cache13–7-0.0436%23 Jul
train13–5-0.0335%22 Jul
inferno13–60.0337%22 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0724%22 Jul
overpass13–40.1450%21 Jul
office13–80.0739%21 Jul
dust25–13-0.0329%21 Jul
office5–13-0.0150%20 Jul
italy0–13-0.090%20 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0639%20 Jul
dust23–13-0.0750%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0641%20 Jul
fachwerk7–130.0330%19 Jul
cache13–9-0.0439%19 Jul
dust26–13-0.0569%19 Jul
office10–130.0332%19 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0528%19 Jul
shelter5–13-0.0627%18 Jul
mirage9–130.0038%18 Jul
office13–100.0228%17 Jul
cache9–130.0731%17 Jul
dust24–13-0.0034%17 Jul
shelter10–130.0453%16 Jul
office13–9-0.0242%16 Jul
mirage12–120.0526%15 Jul
dust212–12-0.0119%15 Jul
dust26–130.0028%14 Jul
office3–13-0.0932%14 Jul
cache13–100.0245%10 Jul
boulder13–30.0634%10 Jul
shelter13–20.0232%9 Jul
shelter4–0-0.050%9 Jul
boulder13–30.0119%9 Jul
fachwerk13–11-0.0333%9 Jul
office12–120.1329%7 Jul
office9–13-0.0239%3 Jul
vertigo13–60.0242%3 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0422%2 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0742%2 Jul
mirage5–130.0132%2 Jul
cache7–13-0.0544%2 Jul
alpine12–12-0.0133%1 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0617%1 Jul
cache12–120.0741%1 Jul
nuke13–90.0243%30 Jun
dust210–130.0351%30 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0124%30 Jun
office12–12-0.0129%30 Jun
italy12–120.0249%29 Jun
office13–80.0261%29 Jun
alpine5–13-0.0729%29 Jun
ancient13–90.0222%29 Jun
cache11–13-0.0829%28 Jun
dust213–8-0.0040%28 Jun
mirage13–20.0955%28 Jun
alpine13–4-0.0255%28 Jun
vertigo7–130.0648%28 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0330%28 Jun
italy10–13-0.0035%27 Jun
nuke13–50.0155%27 Jun
stronghold13–70.0334%27 Jun
office8–13-0.0441%27 Jun
mirage13–110.1031%27 Jun
cache13–9-0.0323%27 Jun
inferno13–40.0535%26 Jun
cache4–13-0.0235%26 Jun
ancient7–130.0130%26 Jun
office7–13-0.0833%25 Jun
dust212–120.0241%25 Jun
italy13–60.0150%25 Jun
office1–13-0.0347%25 Jun
alpine13–50.0761%25 Jun
ancient13–70.0147%23 Jun
cache5–13-0.0131%23 Jun
office13–50.0245%18 Jun
dust24–13-0.0833%18 Jun
train13–40.0435%11 Jun
alpine13–20.0638%11 Jun
mirage10–130.0141%10 Jun
office11–130.0636%10 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0531%7 Jun
mirage13–70.0231%7 Jun
office6–130.0250%6 Jun
office13–30.1048%2 Jun
ancient13–90.0825%2 Jun
cache13–50.0748%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →