radiatorbg — CS2 Stats

76561198309214532[U:1:348948804]

2,169Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,317Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,619Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4556 of 49121 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,841 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,619Peak Premier on CSDB

2,841Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,841
Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 159 to go
Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,619
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,381 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-30
Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	61.0%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	10.2%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.52	1.08
Match win rate	52.3%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning65

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWLLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression8.4

Utility5.5

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.5

Utility5.5

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time508ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms

Headshot accuracy29.8%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 31.3% → last ⅓ avg 29.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — debris 9–2

13–0Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 0% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	34	21–13	62%	0.04
dust2	A	20	12–8	60%	0.04
anubis	B	15	8–7	53%	0.05
ancient	A	9	5–4	56%	0.03
inferno	S	6	4–2	67%	0.05
nuke	D	6	0–6	0%	0.02
cache	B	6	3–3	50%	0.06
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.11
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.21
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

218,726Lifetime kills

1.52K/D · Top 10% of Level 10 players

6,469Matches

52.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players

61.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players

10.2%Shot accuracy

30,916MVPs

2,864Hours (in match)

6,944Bombs planted

2,490Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47106,899

M4A4 / M4A1-S28,035

AWP16,196

Desert Eagle15,260

P2000 / USP-S14,651

Glock-186,817

Knife4,293

Galil AR3,378

MP93,029

FAMAS2,324

Lifetime map wins

6,657dust2

5,345inferno

3,084nuke

1,742vertigo

1,535train

688cbble

334office

209lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,762Matches

53%Win rate

1.40Avg K/D

87.3ADR

60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	486	54%	1.39	18.3
Anubis	281	57%	1.49	19.7
Ancient	270	52%	1.43	18.8
Inferno	187	48%	1.32	17.7
Dust2	171	53%	1.31	18.4
Nuke	136	55%	1.36	17.5
Train	72	61%	1.30	17.7
Overpass	60	45%	1.32	18.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.4%Headshot accuracy

35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.2%Spray accuracy

80.0%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

492msReaction time

32.7%T opening success

53.2%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

6.2%Flash assists

5.93HE damage / grenade

12.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.7326% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–8	0.05	33%	24 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.05	37%	23 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	17%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	18%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	30%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	29%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.10	17%	6 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.01	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	19%	6 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.04	24%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	40%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	45%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.17	32%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	14%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	38%	4 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	28%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	37%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	30%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	21%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.09	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	22%	29 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.03	18%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	34%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	22%	27 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.03	36%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	37%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.07	25%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.08	43%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.01	40%	26 Jul →
nuke	2–9	-0.11	26%	26 Jul →
debris	9–2	0.21	32%	25 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	51%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	27%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.04	22%	23 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	42%	22 Jul →
anubis	4–13	0.00	14%	22 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.12	31%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.09	37%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.08	48%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.05	32%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	36%	16 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	25%	16 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.06	32%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.15	31%	15 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.14	35%	15 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	19%	14 Jul →
cache	16–19	-0.00	30%	14 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.02	33%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	19%	13 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	21%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.00	100%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.09	50%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	40%	12 Jul →
ancient	7–3	0.08	30%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	22%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	35%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.07	33%	8 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.16	39%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.07	24%	8 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.16	30%	7 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.10	41%	7 Jul →
overpass	9–6	0.16	37%	4 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.03	31%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	50%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.15	30%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.07	14%	2 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.04	18%	30 Jun →
inferno	16–13	0.06	26%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.09	37%	29 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.01	32%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.11	36%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.21	30%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	40%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.07	31%	23 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	38%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.03	26%	16 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	36%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.07	32%	15 Jun →
vertigo	2–9	-0.08	57%	14 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.04	24%	11 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.04	23%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.05	13%	10 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.15	24%	8 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.03	31%	8 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.01	15%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	30%	6 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.08	38%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.10	31%	29 May →
anubis	10–13	0.03	32%	29 May →
ancient	13–10	0.02	19%	29 May →
anubis	0–13	-0.08	20%	7 May →
inferno	13–10	0.05	39%	7 May →
cache	13–6	-0.01	33%	6 May →
nuke	1–13	0.00	33%	5 May →
cache	13–0	0.12	24%	5 May →
overpass	13–6	0.06	21%	5 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	28%	5 May →
anubis	9–13	0.05	45%	5 May →
mirage	13–4	0.07	44%	3 May →
anubis	11–13	0.01	43%	1 May →