тру адам

тру адам — CS2 Stats

76561198354147334[U:1:393881606]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,219Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#40484 of 48218 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,662 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,662Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,662
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 338 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGтру адамFACEITLevel 10 · 2,662 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,662csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning73
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression10.0
Utility5.3
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.3
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time495ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–4
131Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
1211In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 23infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD32112134%0.00
ancientB24121250%0.01
dust2S2316770%0.05
anubisS64267%0.00
infernoD62433%-0.01
nuke43175%0.03
train41325%0.02
overpass110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,641Matches
52%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
83.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage75249%1.2217.0
Dust252452%1.2217.4
Ancient45454%1.2217.6
Anubis41458%1.2616.6
Inferno15751%1.2117.2
Nuke12051%1.1917.1
Vertigo10257%1.2518.1
Train6152%1.3319.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
493msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
64.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
8.12HE damage / grenade
7.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4729% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.1127%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.036%8 Aug
mirage10–130.0120%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0618%6 Aug
anubis13–80.0317%6 Aug
mirage14–160.019%6 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0126%6 Aug
ancient14–160.0216%6 Aug
mirage8–130.0531%6 Aug
dust213–110.0722%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0413%3 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0415%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0317%30 Jul
inferno11–130.0116%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0529%27 Jul
dust213–70.0529%27 Jul
ancient5–130.0614%27 Jul
dust213–100.0130%27 Jul
mirage13–50.0326%23 Jul
dust213–40.0917%23 Jul
anubis13–100.0216%21 Jul
nuke13–60.0829%9 Jul
anubis5–130.0122%4 Jul
mirage16–140.0313%29 Jun
dust211–130.0627%26 Jun
mirage11–130.0326%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0429%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0314%6 Jun
ancient13–110.0223%3 Jun
inferno13–90.0219%1 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0113%30 May
mirage13–100.0012%19 May
ancient8–13-0.0210%19 May
mirage13–70.0526%18 May
mirage9–13-0.0611%18 May
dust213–30.0419%17 May
mirage2–13-0.0513%16 May
dust213–20.1311%14 May
inferno9–13-0.0135%13 May
inferno9–13-0.0424%8 May
ancient13–100.0027%8 May
mirage7–13-0.0310%29 Apr
ancient13–7-0.039%29 Apr
ancient11–130.0218%31 Mar
ancient13–110.0312%31 Mar
mirage13–110.0520%26 Mar
dust29–130.0219%23 Mar
ancient10–130.0926%25 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0126%24 Feb
mirage5–130.0616%22 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0426%14 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0725%12 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0212%12 Feb
anubis13–60.0216%12 Feb
mirage17–19-0.0229%8 Feb
mirage2–130.0116%8 Feb
dust213–20.1129%17 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0110%16 Jan
ancient5–130.0526%15 Jan
dust213–70.0014%11 Jan
ancient0–8-0.0427%8 Jan
ancient13–80.0021%4 Jan
dust219–170.0536%4 Jan
train9–130.0116%3 Jan
ancient13–70.0314%2 Jan
train5–130.0218%18 Dec
ancient13–11-0.0419%11 Dec
dust213–70.0025%10 Dec
train13–110.0319%6 Dec
ancient13–160.0219%6 Dec
mirage13–80.0727%25 Nov
dust210–130.0025%10 Nov
inferno4–13-0.0620%5 Nov
dust213–70.0932%29 Oct
inferno13–100.0113%21 Oct
dust213–60.0219%21 Oct
dust29–130.0225%19 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0326%18 Oct
ancient9–130.0422%18 Oct
mirage13–160.0530%8 Oct
dust26–130.0133%8 Oct
ancient13–100.0422%26 Sept
mirage11–130.0121%26 Sept
nuke13–90.0419%23 Sept
ancient19–16-0.0127%21 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0311%16 Sept
mirage13–70.1017%14 Sept
dust213–90.0920%1 Sept
nuke13–10.0424%31 Aug
train9–130.0222%11 Aug
dust213–40.1532%7 Aug
ancient16–120.0125%25 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0632%20 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0619%30 May
dust210–13-0.0012%28 May
ancient7–13-0.0313%14 May
dust220–22-0.0331%8 May
mirage8–13-0.0430%4 May
ancient13–10-0.027%24 Apr
mirage7–130.0529%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →