Paulo Minozzo

Paulo Minozzo — CS2 Stats

BR76561198308762438[U:1:348496710]Steam profile ↗

158Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,074Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20054 of 32151 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate48.7%41.7%44.1%above
Shot accuracy11.5%8.8%11.4%meets
Kill/death ratio0.790.971.030.24 short
Match win rate34.2%43.8%45.2%11.0% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPaulo MinozzoPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning33
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.6
Aggression2.0
Utility6.1
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning3.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time640ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — overpass
13Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29161355%-0.01
infernoC29121741%-0.04
anubisS128467%-0.02
dust2D103730%-0.05
ancientB84450%-0.03
cacheC52340%-0.04
nuke43175%0.00
overpass220100%-0.04
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,374Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
1,640Matches
34.2%Match win rate
48.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Blue band
11.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
2,318MVPs
698Hours (in match)
1,608Bombs planted
253Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,775inferno
1,793dust2
964vertigo
689nuke
458train
22office
18cbble
10bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
27.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.6%Spray accuracy
73.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
629msReaction time
19.0%T opening success
35.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
11.36HE damage / grenade
9.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.0308% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–6-0.0118%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0523%26 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0611%26 Aug
mirage13–40.0521%26 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0515%22 Aug
dust24–8-0.0322%22 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0514%21 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0418%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0321%15 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0321%15 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0817%13 Aug
inferno13–80.0326%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.057%13 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0015%12 Aug
inferno13–10.0710%12 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0314%11 Aug
mirage13–50.0124%8 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0822%8 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0716%8 Aug
dust23–13-0.0810%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.0713%8 Aug
dust21–8-0.1110%1 Aug
anubis13–30.0429%31 Jul
mirage13–5-0.038%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.073%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.073%30 Jul
anubis13–30.0229%29 Jul
dust213–6-0.0410%29 Jul
cache15–15-0.0813%29 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0719%26 Jul
overpass13–0-0.0621%25 Jul
mirage15–150.0128%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0221%25 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0828%25 Jul
inferno8–13-0.1125%25 Jul
inferno2–50.0144%8 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0226%8 Jul
mirage5–130.0415%8 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0510%7 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0211%7 Jul
mirage0–7-0.0667%7 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0938%7 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0019%24 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0221%24 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0425%23 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0929%23 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0716%22 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0515%22 Jun
anubis13–10.0919%22 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0116%22 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0226%22 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0720%22 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0610%22 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0426%18 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0718%18 Jun
dust210–13-0.0718%17 Jun
ancient13–11-0.029%17 Jun
inferno8–130.0118%10 Jun
vertigo13–60.0421%10 Jun
dust213–4-0.0415%10 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0422%2 Jun
inferno13–10-0.069%2 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0317%2 Jun
inferno13–90.0228%29 May
anubis13–9-0.0614%27 May
inferno13–10.0522%26 May
inferno13–40.0232%26 May
mirage13–11-0.0621%26 May
inferno13–4-0.0023%26 May
mirage13–11-0.0017%26 May
mirage13–110.0515%23 May
mirage13–30.1216%23 May
inferno13–6-0.0219%23 May
nuke13–40.1028%22 May
mirage11–13-0.0431%22 May
anubis13–40.0127%22 May
ancient13–8-0.0014%22 May
mirage13–20.0312%20 May
cache13–40.0219%20 May
mirage11–13-0.0124%20 May
dust28–13-0.0120%20 May
ancient3–13-0.0424%20 May
inferno9–13-0.0513%19 May
mirage13–50.0837%19 May
inferno5–13-0.0626%19 May
inferno13–6-0.0010%19 May
mirage6–13-0.0213%19 May
cache11–13-0.089%19 May
anubis6–13-0.059%17 May
inferno6–13-0.1113%17 May
dust213–60.0030%15 May
mirage9–13-0.0624%15 May
inferno13–9-0.0819%15 May
mirage13–9-0.0423%15 May
nuke13–110.029%12 May
mirage12–16-0.0323%9 May
cache13–60.0431%8 May
inferno11–13-0.1014%5 May
ancient13–00.0211%2 May
mirage11–13-0.0626%2 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches13-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →