8's silava

8's silava — CS2 Stats

ZW76561198307627038[U:1:347361310]Steam profile ↗

5,337Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,783Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,997Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3515 of 5338 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,403 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

14,997Peak Premier on CSDB
1,403Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,403
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 128 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,997
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate59.2%52.8%above
Shot accuracy9.1%13.7%4.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.081.08meets
Match win rate47.5%49.2%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG8's silavaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,403 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER14,997 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,403csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning59
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47476Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression8.1
Utility4.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.9
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time628ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–10
131Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 53% over 30anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30161453%0.04
mirageB25131252%0.03
infernoC1981142%0.02
anubisD103730%0.02
nukeC73443%0.02
ancientB63350%0.04
train21150%0.05
overpass1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

217,898Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
7,280Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
59.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of tracked players
9.1%Shot accuracy
17,882MVPs
7,783Hours (in match)
6,204Bombs planted
1,410Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4790,169
AWP18,579
MP94,208
MAC-103,067
FAMAS3,009

Lifetime map wins

18,296dust2
17,181inferno
2,063nuke
1,622vertigo
592train
344office
222cbble
66lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,540Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
79.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage78050%1.0416.0
Dust243451%1.0415.7
Inferno36949%1.1216.1
Anubis27549%0.9515.1
Ancient23444%0.9615.5
Vertigo8445%0.9915.7
Nuke7447%0.9715.9
Overpass4542%0.9916.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
617msReaction time
32.8%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
6.34HE damage / grenade
8.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8215% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0324%18 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0320%18 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0715%18 Jun
dust213–6-0.0124%13 May
inferno12–160.0018%4 May
anubis13–160.0224%25 Apr
mirage4–130.0330%25 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0228%25 Apr
nuke13–70.0122%24 Apr
train12–12-0.0037%24 Apr
train13–50.1024%24 Apr
dust215–150.0329%24 Apr
dust210–13-0.0024%24 Apr
ancient4–130.0540%24 Apr
nuke4–130.0023%24 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0718%23 Apr
mirage13–60.0227%23 Apr
dust213–70.0415%23 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0126%22 Apr
nuke10–130.0237%22 Apr
dust211–130.0016%21 Apr
mirage14–160.0933%21 Apr
inferno13–60.0723%20 Apr
mirage13–60.0527%19 Apr
dust213–70.0430%19 Apr
anubis15–150.0430%19 Apr
dust210–130.0529%18 Apr
inferno15–150.0236%18 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0424%17 Apr
inferno13–110.0820%17 Apr
mirage13–20.1235%17 Apr
dust216–140.0722%17 Apr
mirage7–130.0321%17 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0714%16 Apr
inferno13–110.0122%16 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0118%15 Apr
inferno13–40.0933%15 Apr
anubis16–130.0527%15 Apr
nuke13–160.0230%14 Apr
dust29–13-0.0416%14 Apr
nuke13–80.0638%13 Apr
dust213–110.0928%13 Apr
mirage4–130.0220%13 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0529%13 Apr
dust213–60.1636%13 Apr
mirage13–80.0616%12 Apr
overpass11–130.0333%12 Apr
ancient13–70.1225%11 Apr
dust213–20.0643%11 Apr
inferno7–130.0324%11 Apr
dust213–30.1517%11 Apr
inferno8–130.0123%10 Apr
dust213–80.0919%10 Apr
mirage16–140.0618%10 Apr
inferno13–30.1037%10 Apr
dust210–130.0427%10 Apr
dust213–110.0326%10 Apr
mirage13–30.0921%9 Apr
mirage13–80.0028%9 Apr
dust213–70.0632%9 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0210%7 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0032%7 Apr
ancient8–130.0315%7 Apr
dust213–110.0528%6 Apr
ancient13–10.1127%6 Apr
inferno13–80.0226%6 Apr
dust211–130.0129%2 Apr
dust213–110.0022%1 Apr
mirage13–70.0630%31 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0424%31 Mar
nuke13–80.0027%31 Mar
anubis11–130.0432%31 Mar
dust25–13-0.0112%29 Mar
dust210–130.0652%29 Mar
mirage13–70.0721%29 Mar
mirage13–160.0116%29 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0417%29 Mar
anubis13–70.0331%27 Mar
mirage15–150.0621%27 Mar
inferno7–130.0519%27 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0223%26 Mar
anubis5–130.0227%26 Mar
dust28–13-0.0236%26 Mar
mirage13–50.1122%26 Mar
dust215–150.0523%26 Mar
inferno14–160.0719%25 Mar
dust210–130.0032%25 Mar
anubis8–130.0125%25 Mar
ancient13–1-0.0018%25 Mar
mirage13–100.2433%25 Mar
nuke13–16-0.0121%25 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0232%25 Mar
dust26–13-0.0517%24 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0314%22 Mar
inferno13–90.0222%22 Mar
dust212–16-0.0128%22 Mar
dust213–60.2342%22 Mar
mirage19–17-0.0423%21 Mar
dust219–15-0.0022%20 Mar
dust213–9-0.0018%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →