Mak — CS2 Stats

76561198306297405[U:1:346031677]

242Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,167Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate33.8%42.1%42.5%8.6% short
Shot accuracy19.8%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.230.990.99above
Match win rate37.7%43.9%44.2%6.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMakFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning51
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60373Last 10060%Win rateLWWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression6.4
Utility5.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.7

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time583ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — cache 10–1
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
812In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 28dust2Weakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2820871%0.01
mirageB158753%0.02
infernoA138562%0.01
anubisB137654%0.02
dust2B136746%-0.00
overpassA85363%0.03
nukeA74357%-0.01
cache32167%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,699Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
2,686Matches
37.7%Match win rate
33.8%Headshot %
19.8%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 3 players
6,379MVPs
1,023Hours (in match)
2,504Bombs planted
563Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,232
AWP7,864
AUG1,945
SG 5531,804
FAMAS1,114

Lifetime map wins

3,308dust2
3,139inferno
1,739vertigo
1,233train
1,119nuke
160cbble
126office
122lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
595msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.60HE damage / grenade
10.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3744% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0410%24 Aug
cache16–12-0.0310%10 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0716%30 Jun
mirage13–70.049%30 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0721%29 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0115%28 Jun
ancient13–60.0722%28 Jun
inferno13–50.0314%27 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0119%27 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0112%26 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0121%23 Jun
ancient13–50.0417%22 Jun
dust213–80.0315%22 Jun
mirage13–90.0317%20 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0320%19 Jun
dust21–13-0.0923%19 Jun
ancient13–20.0615%16 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0220%16 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0121%16 Jun
anubis13–70.0316%15 Jun
anubis13–100.0223%15 Jun
cache11–130.0517%14 Jun
cache10–10.2513%14 Jun
anubis6–130.0325%14 Jun
ancient13–80.028%13 Jun
dust20–6-0.0620%12 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0518%10 Jun
mirage10–130.0211%10 Jun
ancient15–150.0216%10 Jun
ancient13–110.0521%9 Jun
anubis13–60.0711%9 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0119%8 Jun
ancient13–110.1117%7 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0522%7 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0216%6 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0523%6 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0513%5 Jun
ancient13–110.0013%5 Jun
mirage9–130.0021%4 Jun
dust213–16-0.0416%4 Jun
mirage13–60.0415%3 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0010%3 Jun
overpass11–130.0319%2 Jun
ancient9–10.0420%2 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0511%1 Jun
dust213–100.0720%1 Jun
dust216–130.0423%31 May
overpass13–110.0530%30 May
ancient1–13-0.1210%30 May
mirage8–130.1618%29 May
overpass13–80.0724%29 May
ancient6–13-0.1013%28 May
dust213–8-0.0217%27 May
dust213–40.0524%27 May
inferno13–110.1116%15 May
ancient13–70.026%15 May
dust213–90.0816%14 May
inferno13–110.0514%13 May
inferno11–13-0.019%13 May
anubis13–100.0213%12 May
overpass11–130.0118%12 May
overpass13–80.0115%10 May
mirage11–130.0114%10 May
anubis13–90.0925%10 May
inferno5–13-0.0713%9 May
ancient11–1-0.0523%9 May
anubis13–70.0633%9 May
overpass4–130.0022%9 May
anubis15–150.0317%9 May
mirage13–100.0026%8 May
mirage13–60.0712%8 May
overpass13–40.019%8 May
inferno13–60.0920%8 May
ancient13–10-0.0211%7 May
dust210–13-0.0122%7 May
ancient13–50.1227%7 May
dust23–13-0.0732%7 May
mirage13–50.0019%7 May
ancient14–160.0617%6 May
mirage13–30.0425%5 May
dust27–13-0.0113%5 May
nuke11–130.0028%4 May
ancient16–120.0212%4 May
nuke13–00.0818%1 May
ancient13–110.0215%30 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0416%30 Apr
overpass13–00.0410%30 Apr
ancient13–70.0314%30 Apr
ancient13–70.0217%30 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0214%30 Apr
ancient13–90.0712%29 Apr
dust28–13-0.0214%29 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0316%29 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0312%28 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0016%28 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0312%28 Apr
nuke13–50.087%23 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0017%21 Apr
inferno16–140.0519%21 Apr
ancient10–130.0613%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →