CHAdwick2015 — CS2 Stats

76561198301925544[U:1:341659816]

822Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,619Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCHAdwick2015FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning58
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51418Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression8.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.5

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time647ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — alpine 13–3
132Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA42251760%0.01
infernoC104640%0.02
mirageD92722%0.01
ancientS86275%0.03
nukeA85363%0.00
dust2D72529%-0.01
trainC73443%0.02
alpine220100%0.13
overpass21150%0.06
anubis2020%-0.03
shelter110100%0.02
italy1010%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,305Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
4,331Matches
44.3%Match win rate
46.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
9,838MVPs
1,619Hours (in match)
2,145Bombs planted
935Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,702
AWP10,594
MP92,068
MAC-101,959
P2501,801

Lifetime map wins

6,185inferno
4,693dust2
3,266train
2,049nuke
1,077vertigo
830cbble
384office
119lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
637msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
4.67HE damage / grenade
4.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8403% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0421%24 Jul
inferno10–130.0420%16 Jul
shelter13–90.0220%11 Jul
alpine13–30.1819%8 Jul
cache3–13-0.0619%8 Jul
cache13–100.0320%30 Jun
dust26–130.0121%30 Jun
cache13–60.0626%30 Jun
cache13–40.0018%29 Jun
mirage12–120.0117%26 Jun
dust25–13-0.0020%26 Jun
ancient13–60.0015%21 Jun
cache10–130.0123%21 Jun
train11–130.0623%20 Jun
cache7–130.0116%20 Jun
train6–13-0.0526%19 Jun
cache13–10-0.0221%16 Jun
cache13–80.0118%16 Jun
cache13–6-0.0318%16 Jun
cache12–120.0714%16 Jun
overpass13–80.0217%16 Jun
cache13–5-0.0228%16 Jun
cache1–130.0125%16 Jun
cache13–6-0.0125%15 Jun
alpine13–110.0718%15 Jun
cache13–10-0.0320%14 Jun
cache5–13-0.0439%14 Jun
cache13–110.0117%14 Jun
cache12–120.0016%13 Jun
cache13–20.0516%11 Jun
italy8–13-0.0124%11 Jun
cache6–13-0.0114%9 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.0722%9 Jun
train13–20.0633%9 Jun
cache13–90.0517%9 Jun
cache13–60.0021%9 Jun
cache13–100.0624%9 Jun
cache5–130.0024%8 Jun
cache3–13-0.0716%8 Jun
cache13–70.0133%29 May
cache13–9-0.0119%24 May
cache13–70.0221%24 May
cache12–120.0338%17 May
cache11–130.0320%17 May
cache13–11-0.0419%15 May
cache12–12-0.0216%15 May
cache13–90.0136%10 May
cache11–130.1120%10 May
cache13–100.013%8 May
cache7–130.0219%8 May
cache13–70.0415%5 May
cache3–13-0.0016%5 May
cache12–120.0316%5 May
cache13–20.0127%4 May
anubis6–13-0.0724%4 May
cache13–110.0922%1 May
cache13–5-0.0117%1 May
nuke13–11-0.038%8 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0127%8 Apr
dust24–13-0.0644%8 Apr
dust213–9-0.0415%8 Apr
nuke15–150.0413%6 Apr
dust213–110.0716%16 Mar
ancient13–100.0516%17 Feb
anubis8–130.0215%17 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0118%16 Feb
inferno13–70.0518%16 Feb
dust29–13-0.0312%10 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0435%12 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0022%12 Jan
mirage13–110.0515%11 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0516%11 Jan
mirage16–140.0418%11 Jan
inferno13–90.0540%10 Jan
dust211–13-0.0126%10 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0216%6 Jan
train13–80.0032%4 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0326%4 Jan
train7–130.0529%29 Dec
ancient13–4-0.0120%29 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0325%29 Dec
train13–6-0.0029%29 Dec
mirage3–110.0442%25 Dec
ancient13–20.1034%25 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0120%21 Dec
ancient13–20.0624%21 Dec
mirage10–130.0019%15 Dec
nuke7–130.1118%14 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0234%14 Dec
mirage13–16-0.0022%7 Nov
overpass8–130.1122%31 Oct
ancient10–130.0827%31 Oct
inferno8–130.0111%24 Oct
nuke13–11-0.0314%28 Sept
inferno13–70.0727%28 Sept
train12–120.0517%6 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0532%5 Sept
nuke13–110.0625%4 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0316%2 Sept
inferno2–00.0850%2 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →