zzz

zzz — CS2 Stats

76561198301792610[U:1:341526882]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

424Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,609Hours in CS48Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3 · 1,035 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate52.5%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy17.3%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.910.990.990.09 short
Match win rate35.5%43.9%44.2%8.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzzzFACEITLevel 3 · 1,035 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT43489Last 10043%Win rateWWWWLWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.9
Utility3.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time559ms−119ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — nuke 9–4
131Biggest win — office
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC39152438%0.02
officeA117464%0.02
nukeA116555%0.05
cacheD113827%0.05
ancientC73443%0.06
dust2D61517%0.00
anubisA53260%0.02
infernoC52340%-0.01
vertigo21150%0.06
debris110100%0.03
boulder110100%-0.04
overpass1010%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,754Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
2,711Matches
35.5%Match win rate
52.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
6,483MVPs
2,174Hours (in match)
1,523Bombs planted
512Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,645dust2
3,082inferno
965vertigo
755nuke
529cbble
472train
372office
12lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

121Matches
46%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
73.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage633%0.8013.2
Dust2633%1.3017.2
Inferno425%0.8015.5
Nuke333%1.1817.3
Cache333%0.7613.7
Anubis1100%0.5213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
559msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
9.25HE damage / grenade
7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4512 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.8128% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–80.0018%29 Aug
office13–10.0322%29 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0010%28 Aug
debris9–50.0314%28 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0511%26 Aug
mirage13–40.109%26 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0720%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0324%26 Aug
office13–40.0927%26 Aug
office12–12-0.0237%25 Aug
office10–130.0316%24 Aug
office10–13-0.0630%24 Aug
office13–9-0.0135%24 Aug
office13–70.0517%24 Aug
office13–4-0.0121%18 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0315%18 Aug
office6–130.0625%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%16 Aug
nuke13–50.0250%12 Aug
mirage9–130.0115%12 Aug
dust29–130.0127%9 Aug
mirage12–120.1230%29 Jul
boulder13–6-0.0410%22 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0119%17 Jul
inferno13–90.0621%15 Jul
anubis9–130.0120%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0927%11 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0316%11 Jul
mirage5–130.0233%9 Jul
dust24–80.1014%5 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0112%2 Jul
inferno9–130.0024%2 Jul
cache6–13-0.0123%2 Jul
ancient13–10.1324%1 Jul
ancient13–70.0919%29 Jun
ancient6–130.0211%29 Jun
ancient11–130.0617%28 Jun
inferno11–130.0313%28 Jun
anubis4–130.027%27 Jun
ancient13–10.0610%27 Jun
dust29–13-0.0618%26 Jun
mirage13–50.0619%25 Jun
nuke13–90.1122%24 Jun
mirage12–120.0014%14 Jun
mirage13–20.0717%6 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0210%2 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0612%27 May
nuke11–130.0517%25 May
nuke10–130.0225%25 May
dust28–13-0.067%25 May
nuke13–100.059%24 May
mirage8–130.0115%23 May
nuke9–130.0110%23 May
nuke13–60.0725%21 May
dust27–10.0517%21 May
cache8–130.0511%15 May
cache3–13-0.0514%14 May
mirage16–13-0.0318%10 May
mirage13–70.0516%9 May
mirage11–130.0617%9 May
cache11–13-0.026%8 May
mirage12–120.0111%8 May
nuke13–40.028%6 May
mirage12–120.028%6 May
office13–110.0321%5 May
mirage13–100.1312%5 May
cache9–130.0513%4 May
mirage9–13-0.0013%4 May
dust212–16-0.0430%3 May
vertigo5–90.0729%3 May
mirage13–11-0.0120%3 May
cache13–50.1121%1 May
mirage2–13-0.0723%1 May
cache7–130.0510%30 Apr
cache9–130.0923%30 Apr
mirage6–13-0.034%30 Apr
cache13–100.0811%29 Apr
cache9–130.0732%29 Apr
cache13–100.0614%29 Apr
mirage11–130.009%26 Apr
overpass5–130.0920%26 Apr
mirage13–20.0223%26 Apr
ancient4–130.0512%25 Apr
anubis13–40.077%25 Apr
mirage13–40.0212%25 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0014%23 Apr
mirage13–40.1122%21 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0419%19 Apr
mirage12–120.0827%19 Apr
mirage13–30.087%17 Apr
mirage13–30.0926%17 Apr
mirage11–130.0216%12 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0120%11 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0123%9 Apr
mirage1–70.0023%9 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0319%9 Apr
inferno2–9-0.0750%5 Apr
vertigo9–50.0532%5 Apr
inferno9–7-0.0513%5 Apr
nuke9–40.2820%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →