Bruse — CS2 Stats

76561198300758526[U:1:340492798]

3,204Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since

4,429Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongHybrid Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#9765 of 11756 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,004 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,004Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,004
Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 496 to go
Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	64.6%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	4.7%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.20	1.08
Match win rate	51.6%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning56

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–38–1Last 10061%Win rateWLWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0

Aggression5.2

Utility5.9

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.6

Utility5.9

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time475ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 475ms

Headshot accuracy22.9%−7.1%

first ⅓ avg 29.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–8

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 8dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	S	22	16–6	73%	0.03
mirage	B	18	9–9	50%	0.01
cache	S	17	11–6	65%	0.02
anubis	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.01
inferno	S	8	7–1	88%	0.01
nuke	S	7	6–1	86%	0.03
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

125,951Lifetime kills

1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players

3,995Matches

51.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

64.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players

4.7%Shot accuracy

12,115MVPs

3,180Hours (in match)

4,466Bombs planted

1,755Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4767,646

M4A4 / M4A1-S20,413

P2000 / USP-S7,479

Desert Eagle6,621

Glock-184,359

AWP4,322

Galil AR3,183

MP92,407

MAC-101,774

Knife1,409

Lifetime map wins

6,412inferno

3,685nuke

2,749dust2

1,710vertigo

1,301train

137lake

49office

23cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,568Matches

54%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

83.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	403	57%	1.19	17.2
Anubis	341	60%	1.23	17.4
Mirage	191	47%	1.05	15.9
Inferno	152	55%	1.19	17.2
Nuke	101	49%	1.06	15.5
Dust2	68	29%	0.96	15.1
Train	46	61%	1.23	18.4
Overpass	34	50%	1.20	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

84.0%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

476msReaction time

24.4%T opening success

50.0%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

7.3%Flash assists

5.09HE damage / grenade

15.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.3884% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–6	0.01	29%	25 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.04	19%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.06	38%	24 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.07	24%	24 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.04	35%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	27%	23 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	0.01	22%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	23%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.02	16%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	28%	19 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	17%	31 Jul →
anubis	16–13	0.04	29%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.07	23%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	18%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.15	23%	26 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	31%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.00	18%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	21%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	24%	24 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.03	22%	24 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.03	27%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	17%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.02	14%	22 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	27%	19 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	16%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	27%	19 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	13%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	25%	18 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	20%	18 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	14%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	21%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	15%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.07	38%	29 Jun →
mirage	15–19	0.02	27%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.04	23%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.03	15%	16 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	24%	16 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	17%	21 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	18%	21 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	13%	21 May →
nuke	13–9	0.10	30%	20 May →
anubis	13–10	0.05	38%	20 May →
ancient	13–7	0.08	28%	20 May →
ancient	8–13	0.01	25%	20 May →
dust2	6–13	0.03	21%	20 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	24%	20 May →
ancient	13–9	0.04	23%	19 May →
inferno	13–11	0.01	15%	18 May →
ancient	11–13	0.03	35%	18 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	32%	18 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	22%	18 May →
ancient	13–8	0.16	29%	17 May →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	10%	16 May →
anubis	11–13	0.04	31%	11 May →
anubis	19–17	0.03	27%	11 May →
anubis	13–10	0.02	17%	10 May →
ancient	13–10	0.00	32%	9 May →
ancient	13–10	0.06	39%	9 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	27%	9 May →
nuke	19–17	-0.05	13%	9 May →
nuke	13–10	0.02	30%	8 May →
dust2	11–13	0.02	26%	3 May →
cache	13–7	0.04	43%	2 May →
cache	8–1	0.14	38%	2 May →
cache	13–2	0.04	42%	2 May →
cache	13–9	-0.07	29%	2 May →
cache	11–13	-0.02	29%	1 May →
cache	13–8	0.03	26%	1 May →
cache	13–7	0.06	42%	1 May →
cache	10–13	-0.09	21%	30 Apr →
cache	5–13	0.01	33%	30 Apr →
cache	12–12	0.07	30%	29 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.10	35%	29 Apr →
cache	6–13	0.01	28%	29 Apr →
cache	13–11	-0.00	30%	29 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.04	30%	29 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.03	34%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–1	0.10	25%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–2	-0.01	29%	21 Apr →
ancient	8–13	0.06	19%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	35%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.02	35%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.03	39%	19 Apr →
anubis	10–13	0.04	31%	19 Apr →
nuke	12–5	0.00	26%	19 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.05	24%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	40%	19 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	17%	14 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.06	29%	14 Apr →
anubis	1–13	-0.09	10%	13 Apr →
inferno	10–5	0.05	45%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	17%	12 Apr →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	22%	11 Apr →
anubis	16–12	0.00	33%	11 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.03	22%	11 Apr →