— CS2 Stats

76561198299919762[U:1:339654034]✓ No bans

925Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,105Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate34.7%42.2%42.7%8.0% short
Shot accuracy19.6%11.9%10.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.830.981.000.16 short
Match win rate42.4%43.6%44.1%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning44
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45496Last 10045%Win rateWWLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression3.7
Utility2.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 700ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.4
Utility2.4
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time702ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 702ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+7.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — office 13–2
131Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
712In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB24121250%-0.04
anubisD1431121%-0.03
mirageD134931%-0.02
dust2B136746%-0.01
ancientA116555%-0.03
infernoC94544%-0.03
train42250%-0.01
vertigo42250%-0.02
cache220100%0.01
office21150%0.03
thera220100%0.01
mills21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,137Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
2,532Matches
42.4%Match win rate
34.7%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 3 players
4,327MVPs
1,105Hours (in match)
3,362Bombs planted
526Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,791
AWP7,099
SG 5531,413
P901,106
Tec-91,093

Lifetime map wins

3,662dust2
2,466nuke
2,187vertigo
1,510inferno
1,404office
685train
198cbble
72lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

174Matches
48%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
67.2ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo3759%1.0514.4
Anubis3658%1.0614.4
Mirage2941%0.9114.2
Nuke2236%0.8113.6
Inferno1346%1.0416.9
Ancient1233%0.7512.4
Overpass1242%0.9815.5
Dust210%0.6920.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.3%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
700msReaction time
31.7%T opening success
27.6%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
11.86HE damage / grenade
0.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 700.4933ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.433 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7308% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–20.0319%5 Aug
cache10–10.0330%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0124%27 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0717%27 Jul
nuke13–70.0827%19 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0341%19 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0225%22 Jun
nuke4–13-0.1313%22 Jun
dust213–6-0.0216%26 May
cache13–5-0.0228%15 May
office13–20.119%26 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0018%26 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0114%25 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0710%16 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0517%6 Apr
dust210–13-0.0426%10 Jan
dust210–130.0129%11 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0612%11 Jun
office6–13-0.0613%16 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0733%2 Apr
dust27–130.0412%29 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0022%29 Mar
dust213–80.0214%29 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0717%28 Mar
nuke13–50.0218%28 Mar
train7–13-0.0122%28 Mar
dust215–15-0.0216%27 Mar
train13–7-0.0111%27 Mar
anubis13–40.0113%27 Mar
ancient9–13-0.067%27 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0533%26 Mar
inferno13–90.0020%26 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0010%26 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0216%24 Mar
dust213–8-0.0612%24 Mar
ancient13–30.0617%24 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0810%24 Mar
mirage4–13-0.079%24 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0029%16 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0311%16 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0016%16 Mar
dust211–13-0.0312%13 Mar
inferno13–3-0.069%13 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0113%10 Mar
inferno13–110.0419%10 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0513%10 Mar
nuke13–70.0312%9 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0613%28 Feb
mirage15–150.0011%27 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0319%27 Feb
train13–100.0323%27 Feb
nuke8–13-0.105%19 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0625%8 Feb
train6–13-0.0516%8 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0615%3 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0616%3 Feb
inferno16–14-0.0613%25 Jan
ancient8–13-0.083%19 Jan
vertigo9–13-0.0211%19 Jan
dust25–13-0.0321%18 Jan
anubis11–13-0.039%18 Jan
ancient8–13-0.074%17 Jan
mirage13–60.0219%17 Jan
nuke13–50.0110%17 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0322%16 Jan
dust25–40.0621%16 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0627%14 Jan
ancient13–3-0.0416%14 Dec
dust211–130.0124%14 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0116%14 Dec
anubis11–13-0.0422%11 Dec
nuke15–15-0.0310%5 Dec
mirage10–130.0222%5 Dec
dust213–11-0.0420%5 Dec
ancient11–130.0011%19 Nov
dust213–10-0.0711%19 Nov
nuke8–13-0.0521%21 Oct
anubis13–16-0.053%14 Oct
mirage13–60.0415%29 Sept
nuke16–14-0.067%6 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0411%26 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0510%25 Jul
vertigo13–8-0.049%8 Jul
inferno1–13-0.078%2 Jul
anubis13–10.0314%2 Jul
anubis13–100.0514%30 Jun
thera13–4-0.057%29 Jun
mills13–7-0.0219%29 Jun
vertigo15–15-0.045%27 Jun
nuke11–13-0.097%27 Jun
thera13–50.0815%26 Jun
mills7–13-0.058%26 Jun
vertigo16–130.0418%25 Jun
nuke9–13-0.1210%25 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0510%24 Jun
inferno8–13-0.079%24 Jun
inferno8–13-0.037%17 Jun
anubis5–13-0.048%17 Jun
anubis11–13-0.036%16 Jun
mirage13–110.0610%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →