JG Fentworth

JG Fentworth — CS2 Stats

US76561198298600172[U:1:338334444]Steam profile ↗

1,056Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,013Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,853Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2916 of 12850 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,453 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJG FentworthFACEITLevel 8 · 1,453 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,853 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning43
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50464Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression2.6
Utility3.8
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.3
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time535ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 23anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C31131842%-0.03
cacheS2316770%-0.01
mirageC1881044%-0.02
infernoB84450%-0.01
nukeD72529%-0.05
anubisD61517%-0.02
vertigo330100%0.01
ancient220100%-0.00
shelter1010%-0.09
overpass110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,870Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
3,970Matches
42.2%Match win rate
50.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
9,115MVPs
1,569Hours (in match)
4,820Bombs planted
967Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,026
AWP15,619
SSG 081,549
P901,325
MP91,111
MP71,088

Lifetime map wins

16,880dust2
2,197inferno
646nuke
573train
376cbble
284lake
246bank
194vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

263Matches
57%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
69.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24252%0.8012.9
Mirage3355%0.9413.9
Cache3067%1.0315.1
Anubis1354%0.8413.0
Nuke1145%0.6911.6
Inferno1164%0.9014.7
Overpass967%0.8312.9
Ancient333%0.8620.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
528msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.27HE damage / grenade
6.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4962 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4925% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0921%24 Aug
dust23–13-0.0625%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0443%20 Aug
cache11–130.0320%17 Aug
dust213–11-0.0522%17 Aug
mirage13–10.1326%17 Aug
dust213–7-0.0225%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0031%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.097%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0123%13 Aug
cache13–2-0.0214%11 Aug
mirage13–5-0.059%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0638%11 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0519%11 Aug
dust22–13-0.0457%11 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0232%11 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0812%10 Aug
dust213–30.0436%10 Aug
cache13–5-0.0224%4 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0114%3 Aug
vertigo13–10.0320%3 Aug
dust210–130.0226%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0232%1 Aug
cache4–13-0.0617%1 Aug
mirage1–80.0117%1 Aug
cache8–13-0.0230%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0717%1 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0223%31 Jul
cache13–90.0217%31 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0624%30 Jul
dust216–13-0.0031%28 Jul
cache13–5-0.0428%28 Jul
ancient13–60.0527%28 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0720%28 Jul
dust25–13-0.1311%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0037%23 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0426%23 Jul
mirage19–170.0026%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0215%20 Jul
cache2–00.000%20 Jul
anubis8–130.0126%19 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0715%16 Jul
dust213–10.0111%16 Jul
anubis13–90.0230%14 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0130%14 Jul
shelter2–13-0.0926%14 Jul
cache13–80.0328%12 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0140%12 Jul
dust213–10-0.0129%12 Jul
cache13–3-0.0432%12 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0236%12 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0125%12 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0513%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0027%11 Jul
dust21–13-0.1031%11 Jul
cache13–60.0424%11 Jul
dust213–60.0221%11 Jul
dust20–13-0.03100%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.1141%11 Jul
dust213–7-0.0422%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.1018%10 Jul
dust216–12-0.0317%10 Jul
cache13–6-0.0023%9 Jul
cache13–90.0435%9 Jul
cache13–60.0418%8 Jul
cache0–5-0.070%8 Jul
dust212–12-0.0811%8 Jul
mirage13–40.0834%8 Jul
cache10–130.0014%8 Jul
dust213–80.0016%8 Jul
cache13–90.0333%8 Jul
mirage11–130.0114%7 Jul
cache13–3-0.0515%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.089%4 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0314%4 Jul
dust210–130.0230%2 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0419%1 Jul
cache13–60.0231%1 Jul
dust213–110.0119%30 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0725%30 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0439%29 Jun
dust210–13-0.0617%29 Jun
dust213–70.0629%29 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0234%29 Jun
inferno11–130.0218%29 Jun
dust25–13-0.0624%29 Jun
dust213–11-0.0321%28 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0519%28 Jun
dust23–13-0.0629%28 Jun
inferno13–70.0616%26 Jun
cache13–80.0718%25 Jun
inferno9–50.1117%24 Jun
vertigo3–00.020%24 Jun
inferno13–8-0.1118%24 Jun
dust26–13-0.0530%23 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0619%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0622%22 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0128%22 Jun
cache12–12-0.0722%22 Jun
overpass13–40.0226%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →