Tronald Dump — CS2 Stats

76561198298437183[U:1:338171455]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,186Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

971Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,345Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12598 of 39349 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,367 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	36.4%	46.1%	47.0%	10.6% short
Shot accuracy	11.4%	12.6%	12.7%	1.3% short
Kill/death ratio	1.35	1.05	1.07	above
Match win rate	50.3%	45.7%	46.4%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning56

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWWLWTWWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4

Aggression9.2

Utility4.8

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning5.6

Utility4.8

Mechanics9.6

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time533ms−73ms

first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%+2.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–8

13–0Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 23nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	23	15–8	65%	0.05
mirage	A	20	12–8	60%	0.04
inferno	B	19	9–10	47%	0.01
ancient	A	19	11–8	58%	0.02
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.02
nuke	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.00
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,959Lifetime kills

1.35K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players

2,304Matches

50.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players

36.4%Headshot %

11.4%Shot accuracy

6,453MVPs

971Hours (in match)

2,641Bombs planted

698Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,302

AWP11,259

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,126

Desert Eagle2,382

P2000 / USP-S2,308

Galil AR1,974

Glock-181,631

FAMAS1,107

SSG 081,050

P250897

Lifetime map wins

6,212dust2

4,035inferno

1,309nuke

495train

106cbble

78vertigo

52lake

29office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

93Matches

54%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

98.1ADR

27%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	6	50%	1.29	17.0
Ancient	5	100%	1.36	19.6
Nuke	4	50%	1.34	21.5
Dust2	3	33%	1.04	15.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy

41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

93.3%Counter-strafing

6.6°Preaim

530msReaction time

35.6%T opening success

55.1%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

8.11HE damage / grenade

6.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4877 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.6356% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	0.05	26%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.07	31%	23 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	8%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	16%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.07	27%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.02	12%	20 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.02	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.02	40%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.06	43%	16 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.02	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	38%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.15	19%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.06	16%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.00	9%	15 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.02	17%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–0	0.10	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	24%	10 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	10%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	28%	9 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.07	29%	9 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	9%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	4%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.09	7%	9 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	14%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	16%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.10	27%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	8%	8 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.06	10%	8 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.09	31%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.08	22%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.03	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.08	14%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	13%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	29%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.03	12%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.01	19%	4 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	12%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.12	16%	3 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.03	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.14	18%	2 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	4%	2 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	9%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	26%	1 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.06	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.05	24%	1 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.01	7%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	14%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	17%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.04	18%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	8%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	15%	29 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	28%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.05	16%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.13	38%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	27%	27 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	22%	27 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	18%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.05	16%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	23%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.03	27%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.08	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	12%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	22%	26 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	8%	26 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.08	4%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	6%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.08	21%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	29%	25 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	26%	25 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	9%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	20%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	9%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.07	24%	18 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.02	11%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.10	30%	17 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	15%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.11	23%	17 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	10%	17 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	10%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.08	12%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.07	22%	17 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.07	20%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	13%	16 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	20%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	23%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–3	-0.02	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.04	18%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.13	33%	16 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.05	20%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	13%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	20%	11 Jul →