target — CS2 Stats
US76561198295672073[U:1:335406345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 7 median | Level 8 median | vs Level 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 38.4% | 46.2% | 47.2% | 8.8% short |
| Shot accuracy | 17.7% | 12.5% | 12.3% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 0.08 short |
| Match win rate | 41.8% | 45.9% | 46.3% | 4.5% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 36 | 19–17 | 53% | 0.03 | |
| B | 26 | 13–13 | 50% | 0.02 | |
| B | 15 | 7–8 | 47% | 0.04 | |
| C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | -0.01 | |
| B | 6 | 3–3 | 50% | 0.01 | |
| D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | -0.04 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | -0.03 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 6 | 100% | 1.22 | 17.0 |
| Ancient | 6 | 67% | 1.33 | 19.7 |
| Inferno | 4 | 75% | 0.95 | 14.0 |
| Vertigo | 4 | 50% | 1.25 | 16.5 |
| Dust2 | 4 | 100% | 1.07 | 17.0 |
| Nuke | 2 | 50% | 1.11 | 19.5 |
| Anubis | 2 | 50% | 0.77 | 11.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–10 | 0.10 | 26% | 9 May → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.01 | 25% | 8 May → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.05 | 20% | 8 May → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.05 | 22% | 8 May → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.08 | 31% | 8 May → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.10 | 34% | 8 May → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.00 | 31% | 7 May → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 28% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 28% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 13% | 7 May → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.03 | 19% | 7 May → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 6 May → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.15 | 37% | 6 May → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.01 | 23% | 6 May → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.01 | 13% | 1 May → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.07 | 20% | 1 May → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.02 | 19% | 1 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 1 May → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 34% | 1 May → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 36% | 25 Apr → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.01 | 24% | 25 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 30% | 25 Apr → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.02 | 22% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 13% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 23% | 4 Apr → | ||
| 10–0 | 0.11 | 13% | 4 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 19% | 4 Apr → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.00 | 23% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.10 | 9% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 2–2 | -0.06 | 17% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 30% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.01 | 28% | 2 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.06 | 21% | 25 Dec → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.04 | 22% | 25 Dec → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.09 | 19% | 6 Nov → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 25% | 6 Nov → | ||
| 8–0 | 0.07 | 19% | 6 Nov → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.12 | 29% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 9–6 | 0.06 | 23% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 5–9 | -0.06 | 28% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.00 | 12% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 7–9 | -0.06 | 13% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 3–9 | -0.15 | 9% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.02 | 11% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.16 | 16% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 9–1 | 0.14 | 17% | 2 Nov → | ||
| 9–6 | 0.11 | 30% | 2 Nov → | ||
| 9–6 | -0.01 | 9% | 2 Nov → | ||
| 9–2 | 0.13 | 20% | 29 Oct → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 19 Oct → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 18 Oct → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 31% | 18 Oct → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.02 | 19% | 17 Oct → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.02 | 23% | 17 Oct → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.11 | 26% | 17 Oct → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 8% | 17 Oct → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.00 | 24% | 17 Oct → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.06 | 17% | 16 Oct → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.07 | 20% | 23 Sept → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 8% | 23 Sept → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.07 | 6% | 23 Sept → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 14% | 22 Sept → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 26% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 18% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 27% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.02 | 21% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.11 | 27% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 11% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.16 | 14% | 3 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 6% | 2 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.09 | 18% | 2 Jun → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.03 | 13% | 1 Jun → | ||
| 6–9 | 0.04 | 30% | 1 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 26% | 1 Jun → | ||
| 9–6 | 0.10 | 16% | 1 Jun → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.15 | 24% | 31 May → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 22% | 31 May → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.07 | 31% | 31 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 19% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 6–3 | 0.03 | 17% | 6 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 22% | 5 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 29% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 19–22 | -0.04 | 12% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.15 | 22% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.13 | 38% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.06 | 35% | 26 Apr → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.03 | 52% | 12 Apr → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 0% | 12 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 6 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.05 | 24% | 6 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.06 | 39% | 3 Apr → | ||
| 0–11 | -0.10 | 0% | 22 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 17% | 22 Mar → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.13 | 38% | 15 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 24% | 15 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.11 | 38% | 13 Mar → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 13 Mar → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.14 | 54% | 13 Mar → |
Match data via Leetify.