ppokrywka

ppokrywka — CS2 Stats

PL76561198293040467[U:1:332774739]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

358Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,012Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGppokrywkaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning42
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50455Last 10050%Win rateLWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression4.6
Utility4.2
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.2
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time613ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — inferno 9–1
131Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoB21111052%0.04
infernoA1911858%0.06
mirageC1761135%0.01
anubisD113827%0.01
ancientA117464%-0.02
nukeA116555%-0.00
overpassA74357%0.03
dust2110100%-0.05
assembly110100%0.18
memento1010%-0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,505Lifetime kills
1.37K/D · Top 10% of tracked players
2,356Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
54.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
11.3%Shot accuracy
6,725MVPs
1,012Hours (in match)
3,513Bombs planted
737Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,147
AWP8,395
P901,309
Negev1,056
Knife793

Lifetime map wins

8,349inferno
1,704dust2
1,279vertigo
1,108nuke
368cbble
341train
63lake
38safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

249Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
76.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5853%1.0313.4
Anubis3444%1.0313.5
Ancient3053%1.1516.2
Inferno2759%1.2814.8
Nuke1963%1.2815.9
Vertigo1747%1.1113.7
Dust21567%1.3818.3
Overpass729%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
562msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
33.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
11.31HE damage / grenade
10.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.28% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.0718%25 Jul
dust213–6-0.0532%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0113%17 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0126%12 Jul
ancient13–80.027%11 Jul
mirage8–130.0111%8 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0113%8 Jul
overpass9–70.0515%5 Jul
inferno9–60.0814%5 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0511%5 Jul
ancient13–4-0.076%5 Jul
inferno5–90.1319%5 Jul
vertigo9–10.2011%4 Jul
inferno9–40.0527%2 Jul
nuke3–9-0.1114%2 Jul
inferno9–10.2812%1 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0316%1 Jul
overpass9–30.1535%1 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1711%30 Jun
nuke9–00.164%30 Jun
anubis11–130.0217%6 Feb
anubis4–130.0428%6 Feb
mirage8–10.0833%2 Feb
inferno13–110.0218%17 Aug
assembly9–20.188%15 Aug
vertigo9–30.1825%11 Aug
nuke1–9-0.176%11 Aug
inferno9–30.2030%11 Aug
memento1–9-0.2333%11 Aug
vertigo6–130.0017%3 May
anubis11–13-0.0212%30 Apr
vertigo9–40.0821%29 Apr
inferno9–10.2527%29 Apr
inferno13–50.0413%28 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0119%28 Apr
mirage11–130.0719%25 Apr
overpass9–00.1315%25 Apr
vertigo8–80.0229%23 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0414%20 Apr
ancient13–90.0326%20 Apr
inferno9–40.1722%20 Apr
inferno5–9-0.0232%18 Apr
vertigo9–50.0513%17 Apr
inferno8–80.1128%16 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0631%4 Apr
ancient3–13-0.1114%26 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0526%24 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0621%23 Mar
inferno9–130.0520%22 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0318%21 Mar
vertigo9–13-0.0815%21 Mar
mirage13–70.0216%21 Mar
nuke6–90.0518%19 Mar
vertigo9–130.0114%12 Mar
mirage15–150.0118%10 Mar
vertigo9–30.1116%10 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0210%3 Mar
mirage10–130.0121%3 Mar
vertigo13–60.1017%3 Mar
anubis13–110.0513%3 Mar
mirage0–13-0.0314%29 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0119%28 Feb
vertigo13–60.0021%28 Feb
vertigo13–9-0.029%28 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0022%28 Feb
mirage16–130.0520%26 Feb
vertigo13–110.1017%25 Feb
anubis13–20.0318%25 Feb
nuke9–40.0620%23 Feb
nuke8–8-0.037%22 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.0117%7 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0712%20 Jan
nuke13–70.0217%17 Jan
mirage13–80.0925%15 Jan
vertigo13–8-0.0226%14 Jan
vertigo13–100.0310%14 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0811%7 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0214%7 Jan
nuke13–110.0116%6 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0616%6 Jan
vertigo3–130.0716%6 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0216%6 Jan
anubis13–10.1312%6 Jan
overpass14–16-0.0114%5 Jan
ancient16–140.0412%31 Dec
nuke13–110.0416%31 Dec
inferno9–10.1514%30 Dec
mirage13–70.0621%30 Dec
vertigo9–130.0336%30 Dec
vertigo6–13-0.0915%30 Dec
mirage13–160.0413%29 Dec
inferno13–160.0220%28 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0715%28 Dec
vertigo5–130.0031%28 Dec
ancient13–5-0.077%26 Dec
vertigo15–150.0414%26 Dec
nuke13–10-0.0011%26 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0323%26 Dec
ancient10–130.0631%25 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0310%25 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →