๐Œ“๐Œ„๐Œ‘๐Œ‘๐Œ‰๐Œ—๐Œ„๐Œ“

๐Œ“๐Œ„๐Œ‘๐Œ‘๐Œ‰๐Œ—๐Œ„๐Œ“ โ€” CS2 Stats

76561198291950224[U:1:331684496]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

362Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
827Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,030Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band ยท top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8642 of 23531 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.9%44.2%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy5.9%11.2%11.8%5.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.191.041.04above
Match win rate46.4%45.3%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐Œ“๐Œ„๐Œ‘๐Œ‘๐Œ‰๐Œ—๐Œ„๐Œ“FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,030 ยท Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning67
Utility45

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59โ€“37โ€“4Last 10059%Win rateWWLWTLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate ยท -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler โ€” Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2
Aggression9.2
Utility4.5
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 โ€” the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success โ€” winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 30% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.7
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04โˆ’0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.04 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.04
Reaction time517ms+8ms
first โ…“ avg 509ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+2.2%
first โ…“ avg 20.1% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating โ€” mirage 13โ€“7
13โ€“1Biggest win โ€” mirage
11Longest win streak
W2Current streak
11โ€“4In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map ยท 74% over 19anubisWeakest map ยท 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1914โ€“574%0.07
anubisC188โ€“1044%0.04
cacheB158โ€“753%0.05
nukeS1410โ€“471%0.03
mirageS139โ€“469%0.06
infernoB136โ€“746%0.04
dust2A53โ€“260%0.01
poseidonโ€”10โ€“10%-0.07
eldoradoโ€”11โ€“0100%-0.02
debrisโ€”10โ€“10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,549Lifetime kills
1.19K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 5 players
1,193Matches
46.4%Match win rate ยท Top 50% of Level 5 players
44.9%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Level 5 players
5.9%Shot accuracy
3,784MVPs
461Hours (in match)
716Bombs planted
277Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,773dust2
1,301inferno
902nuke
189vertigo
136cbble
27train
19office
5ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
44.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
8.4ยฐPreaim
501msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
61.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
7.88HE damage / grenade
5.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4724% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy โ†’Anubis grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13โ€“20.0413%23 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0020%22 Aug โ†’
poseidon5โ€“9-0.0733%21 Aug โ†’
eldorado9โ€“7-0.0219%21 Aug โ†’
debris8โ€“80.0725%21 Aug โ†’
ancient8โ€“130.0413%14 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“70.0423%14 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0013%14 Aug โ†’
anubis4โ€“130.0017%14 Aug โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0730%14 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0217%7 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0227%3 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“130.0421%3 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.1325%3 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0417%3 Aug โ†’
ancient6โ€“130.0323%3 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.0820%3 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“60.0627%2 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“130.0542%2 Aug โ†’
dust214โ€“160.0227%2 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“130.0518%2 Aug โ†’
cache8โ€“130.0617%2 Aug โ†’
ancient5โ€“13-0.0250%2 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.1114%2 Aug โ†’
ancient9โ€“130.0218%1 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“10.1344%1 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0621%1 Aug โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0025%1 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.1016%1 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0416%1 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“5-0.0310%1 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0713%31 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0720%31 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0522%31 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0712%31 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“60.1326%31 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.1323%31 Jul โ†’
anubis15โ€“150.0018%31 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.1113%31 Jul โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0220%31 Jul โ†’
ancient16โ€“120.0918%30 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0826%30 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“100.1531%30 Jul โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0321%30 Jul โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0223%30 Jul โ†’
inferno9โ€“30.1033%30 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0513%30 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.0521%30 Jul โ†’
nuke2โ€“13-0.0230%30 Jul โ†’
anubis15โ€“150.0923%30 Jul โ†’
inferno8โ€“13-0.060%30 Jul โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0216%29 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.1032%29 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0339%29 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.1535%29 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.2016%29 Jul โ†’
anubis7โ€“130.0417%29 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“30.098%28 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0324%28 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“20.1050%28 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.1311%26 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“90.1125%26 Jul โ†’
anubis6โ€“130.0431%26 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0717%26 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0521%25 Jul โ†’
cache7โ€“13-0.0122%25 Jul โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0518%25 Jul โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.029%25 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.016%24 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0533%24 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“6-0.0420%24 Jul โ†’
anubis7โ€“130.0413%24 Jul โ†’
anubis6โ€“10.015%24 Jul โ†’
cache10โ€“130.1223%24 Jul โ†’
cache12โ€“120.0624%24 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.1230%24 Jul โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0726%23 Jul โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0131%23 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“40.0235%23 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0326%23 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0316%23 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.0133%22 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“110.1013%22 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0013%22 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0716%22 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.1619%22 Jul โ†’
nuke16โ€“130.0413%22 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“30.0221%22 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“7-0.0121%21 Jul โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0218%21 Jul โ†’
cache6โ€“130.0126%21 Jul โ†’
anubis6โ€“130.0622%21 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.1124%21 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“110.1523%21 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.1225%21 Jul โ†’
cache10โ€“13-0.0522%20 Jul โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0112%20 Jul โ†’
cache3โ€“13-0.1110%20 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0523%20 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.1015%20 Jul โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’