spawn_of_satan.exe

spawn_of_satan.exe — CS2 Stats

SE76561198290762064[U:1:330496336]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,243Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,296Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating13,702Blue band · top ~35.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16790 of 25115 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.3%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy16.5%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.920.990.990.07 short
Match win rate38.2%43.9%44.2%6.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGspawn_of_satan.exeFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,702 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning58
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD513811Last 10051%Win rateLLLTLLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression7.3
Utility2.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.8
Utility2.1
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time637ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy26.2%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — inferno 9–0
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB35171849%0.00
mirageC146843%-0.01
cacheS139469%-0.00
nukeA117464%0.00
anubisD62433%0.00
ancientS64267%0.01
overpass41325%-0.06
dust231233%-0.01
vertigo31233%-0.01
office21150%0.03
shelter21150%0.00
debris110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,557Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
6,199Matches
38.2%Match win rate
43.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
14,608MVPs
1,296Hours (in match)
2,586Bombs planted
1,423Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,455
AWP10,043
SSG 082,852
SG 5532,000
MP91,792
MP71,762

Lifetime map wins

10,095lake
6,661inferno
1,920vertigo
1,625nuke
1,193dust2
846train
785office
636cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
41%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
74.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient825%1.0217.5
Anubis580%1.1317.8
Inferno425%0.7413.0
Mirage475%0.9112.8
Nuke30%0.6911.7
Dust2333%0.4010.0
Vertigo250%1.0416.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
73.4%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
643msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.30Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
9.25HE damage / grenade
1.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2964 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2754% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0123%13 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1226%12 Aug
anubis10–130.0535%9 Aug
inferno8–80.0642%9 Aug
inferno7–9-0.1110%9 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0232%8 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0221%8 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0516%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0229%6 Aug
mirage10–130.0021%6 Aug
cache13–9-0.0423%6 Aug
dust213–60.0540%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.038%5 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0622%5 Aug
nuke10–130.0725%5 Aug
cache13–8-0.0128%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0115%5 Aug
nuke13–60.0233%5 Aug
vertigo10–130.0227%3 Aug
nuke6–2-0.0630%3 Aug
cache13–11-0.0320%3 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0125%3 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0321%2 Aug
office13–30.0847%2 Aug
inferno7–90.0337%2 Aug
inferno9–00.3041%2 Aug
inferno9–20.1526%29 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0725%29 Jul
inferno13–60.0133%22 Jul
ancient13–50.1217%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0631%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0511%21 Jul
cache13–160.0425%21 Jul
shelter5–13-0.0326%21 Jul
shelter5–00.0343%21 Jul
debris9–60.0021%20 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0515%20 Jul
cache16–13-0.0324%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.1519%16 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0222%15 Jul
cache13–90.0319%14 Jul
mirage13–10.1215%14 Jul
mirage6–130.0225%12 Jul
cache13–5-0.029%12 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0419%12 Jul
office11–13-0.0338%12 Jul
cache13–8-0.0121%10 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0921%10 Jul
vertigo9–5-0.0120%10 Jul
inferno9–5-0.0438%10 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0019%22 Jun
cache13–6-0.0432%17 May
inferno8–8-0.1113%14 May
inferno8–80.0142%14 May
inferno2–9-0.2125%14 May
inferno5–9-0.1133%14 May
inferno13–11-0.0124%12 May
overpass13–16-0.0410%12 May
nuke13–9-0.0116%12 May
overpass8–130.0122%11 May
inferno13–80.0414%11 May
mirage13–40.0919%11 May
overpass13–5-0.058%11 May
nuke10–130.0415%10 May
mirage16–12-0.0019%10 May
ancient13–90.0118%10 May
inferno3–9-0.110%10 May
inferno9–60.0321%10 May
inferno9–70.0135%10 May
inferno8–8-0.1021%10 May
inferno13–5-0.0425%9 May
anubis13–50.0819%9 May
nuke13–10-0.0817%9 May
ancient13–7-0.0124%9 May
inferno9–70.0521%9 May
cache13–10-0.0226%9 May
mirage12–12-0.0110%9 May
mirage13–11-0.0422%6 May
dust26–13-0.0731%6 May
inferno9–20.0350%6 May
overpass2–9-0.1725%4 May
inferno8–80.0317%4 May
nuke13–70.0714%3 May
inferno8–80.0822%3 May
inferno9–50.1136%3 May
inferno9–30.0525%3 May
inferno9–60.1725%3 May
cache8–130.0732%2 May
cache7–130.0216%2 May
nuke15–15-0.0111%29 Apr
inferno8–80.0121%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.0124%29 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0223%28 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0111%28 Apr
dust28–13-0.0014%28 Apr
mirage13–3-0.010%27 Apr
nuke13–10.0533%27 Apr
nuke2–0-0.000%27 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0813%26 Apr
inferno16–140.0218%26 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →