Snapo — CS2 Stats

76561198289711298[U:1:329445570]

568Tracked matches39%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,466Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 Solid
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,246 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.9%49.0%52.0%1.1% short
Shot accuracy13.2%13.1%13.7%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.021.081.080.06 short
Match win rate47.3%46.9%48.8%1.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnapoFACEITLevel 9 · 2,246 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning74
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateTWWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression10.0
Utility6.1
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning7.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time604ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 28.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 16–13
121Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6nukeWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%0.01
mirageB23121152%-0.01
nukeC167944%-0.00
ancientA127558%0.02
cacheA85363%0.05
anubisS65183%0.05
overpass31233%0.02
inferno31233%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,368Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
2,712Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
50.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8,580MVPs
1,466Hours (in match)
2,810Bombs planted
663Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,484dust2
3,709inferno
1,265cbble
1,065nuke
175vertigo
130train
101office
9aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
88.4ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27647%1.0816.9
Mirage6149%1.0017.3
Ancient4060%0.9916.2
Nuke3348%1.1517.2
Inferno1362%1.0418.1
Overpass1258%1.5020.6
Cache967%1.4023.4
Anubis850%0.8013.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
599msReaction time
44.5%T opening success
61.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
8.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0839%28 Jun
cache13–110.0522%6 Jun
cache13–9-0.0426%13 May
nuke8–130.0529%12 May
dust210–130.0320%12 May
cache16–120.0726%10 May
cache13–50.0525%9 May
cache9–130.0620%3 May
ancient13–50.0519%3 May
cache5–130.0922%3 May
cache14–160.0127%3 May
cache16–130.1132%3 May
mirage2–130.0323%27 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0421%27 Apr
dust213–7-0.0522%26 Apr
dust27–13-0.0318%21 Apr
anubis13–30.0329%21 Apr
mirage9–130.0025%21 Apr
nuke11–130.0320%15 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0514%14 Apr
mirage8–130.1120%14 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0517%6 Apr
nuke13–90.0020%6 Apr
ancient13–50.0615%4 Apr
anubis13–80.0533%4 Apr
dust215–150.0327%3 Apr
overpass5–130.0621%1 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0524%1 Apr
dust21–130.0926%1 Apr
nuke7–130.0321%1 Apr
dust213–6-0.0628%31 Mar
mirage13–80.0135%29 Mar
dust213–100.0329%29 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0521%24 Mar
dust216–14-0.0316%24 Mar
ancient13–70.0837%24 Mar
anubis13–40.0436%23 Mar
dust213–40.0626%23 Mar
ancient14–160.0129%23 Mar
nuke13–40.0113%23 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0822%22 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0418%20 Mar
dust29–13-0.0221%18 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0511%18 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0421%18 Mar
ancient13–80.0539%13 Mar
overpass13–50.0528%10 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0229%10 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0425%5 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0027%4 Mar
dust216–140.0926%26 Feb
dust211–110.0623%19 Feb
ancient13–100.0713%7 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0315%7 Feb
ancient13–90.0024%7 Feb
mirage13–40.0433%3 Feb
ancient9–130.0119%3 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0522%2 Feb
nuke13–40.0230%2 Feb
dust215–15-0.0315%2 Feb
dust213–50.0729%1 Feb
nuke13–110.0119%1 Feb
dust213–50.0917%1 Feb
anubis13–80.1017%1 Feb
dust25–13-0.0648%31 Jan
mirage13–50.0021%29 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0326%29 Jan
dust213–50.0722%25 Jan
dust210–130.0537%22 Jan
anubis13–50.1125%22 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0133%22 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0311%22 Jan
inferno13–90.0731%5 Jan
dust210–13-0.0219%24 Dec
ancient13–70.0131%24 Dec
mirage13–100.0117%18 Dec
nuke13–50.0831%14 Dec
dust213–50.0225%14 Dec
mirage2–13-0.1213%14 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0655%13 Dec
dust213–90.0321%13 Dec
dust210–13-0.0534%12 Dec
nuke7–130.0330%12 Dec
dust212–10.0140%10 Dec
dust21–13-0.0641%8 Dec
dust27–130.0331%8 Dec
dust210–130.0322%3 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0727%1 Dec
dust25–13-0.0732%30 Nov
dust213–60.0036%30 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0222%28 Nov
mirage13–50.0236%28 Nov
mirage13–100.0121%28 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0329%27 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0431%25 Nov
mirage13–16-0.0619%25 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0124%22 Nov
dust213–110.0133%22 Nov
inferno8–13-0.0123%12 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0131%12 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →