Zwifss — CS2 Stats

76561198285846753[U:1:325581025]

810Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,764Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning49
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44524Last 10044%Win rateWLLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8
Aggression6.5
Utility4.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.9
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time594ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB25121348%-0.00
mirageC135838%-0.01
anubisC114736%-0.00
ancientB105550%0.03
nukeB105550%0.00
infernoS96367%0.03
dust2D5050%-0.00
overpassC52340%0.02
vertigoA53260%0.03
office31233%0.02
train3030%-0.06
alpine110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,176Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
2,775Matches
49.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
45.6%Headshot %
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
8,483MVPs
1,100Hours (in match)
1,730Bombs planted
911Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,231inferno
2,067dust2
1,758nuke
1,069vertigo
892train
852cbble
201office
35safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

69Matches
59%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
88.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1145%1.7117.9
Ancient667%1.4724.3
Vertigo475%1.0316.5
Inferno3100%1.3918.0
Anubis367%1.2018.0
Nuke3100%1.7518.0
Train1100%0.9212.0
Overpass1100%1.0814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
586msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.14HE damage / grenade
4.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8039% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0312%25 Jul
mirage17–19-0.0319%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0715%21 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0113%17 Jul
nuke13–50.0512%17 Jul
ancient19–170.1021%17 Jul
ancient13–100.0521%16 Jul
ancient10–130.0340%16 Jul
inferno10–130.0410%13 Jul
office11–13-0.0612%11 Jul
mirage10–10.0010%11 Jul
cache13–00.0414%11 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0035%4 Jul
cache11–13-0.0326%4 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0325%4 Jul
dust29–130.0121%4 Jul
cache13–80.0427%2 Jul
cache9–130.0128%2 Jul
overpass13–16-0.0219%30 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0516%29 Jun
ancient13–100.0423%29 Jun
inferno13–80.0015%29 Jun
cache13–10.0428%28 Jun
cache13–40.0936%28 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0112%26 Jun
inferno13–90.0424%26 Jun
mirage13–00.1411%26 Jun
dust214–160.0420%26 Jun
cache13–80.0012%25 Jun
nuke8–2-0.0335%25 Jun
nuke9–130.0223%24 Jun
overpass7–130.0823%24 Jun
dust27–11-0.0325%24 Jun
anubis13–5-0.028%23 Jun
dust212–16-0.0121%23 Jun
mirage2–80.0157%23 Jun
train7–13-0.099%23 Jun
train7–13-0.0617%22 Jun
train8–13-0.0222%22 Jun
inferno13–1-0.0226%16 Jun
dust210–13-0.0121%15 Jun
overpass13–110.0336%15 Jun
cache13–100.0913%14 Jun
inferno13–80.0627%14 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0414%13 Jun
anubis7–130.0011%13 Jun
ancient13–60.0411%13 Jun
nuke13–60.0223%13 Jun
alpine13–90.0533%12 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0129%12 Jun
cache8–130.0021%12 Jun
anubis13–30.0431%12 Jun
inferno13–30.0312%12 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0538%12 Jun
ancient9–130.0524%12 Jun
vertigo12–120.0516%8 Jun
inferno7–130.0429%8 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0322%7 Jun
cache10–3-0.0133%7 Jun
vertigo13–90.0822%7 Jun
anubis11–130.0725%6 Jun
vertigo11–130.0118%6 Jun
vertigo13–90.0519%5 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0833%1 Jun
cache8–3-0.0512%1 Jun
cache12–120.0427%1 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0535%1 Jun
anubis7–130.0132%31 May
mirage0–13-0.010%28 May
anubis13–10-0.0446%28 May
nuke6–13-0.0024%22 May
mirage13–10.0921%22 May
cache5–13-0.0418%22 May
nuke13–8-0.0517%21 May
cache10–13-0.0723%21 May
vertigo13–9-0.0414%20 May
overpass13–90.0325%17 May
mirage6–13-0.0325%15 May
nuke6–13-0.0122%13 May
office13–80.1125%13 May
office8–130.0033%13 May
inferno13–110.0518%12 May
anubis13–110.0713%12 May
mirage3–13-0.0616%12 May
anubis7–13-0.0730%11 May
cache9–130.0425%11 May
cache12–120.019%7 May
cache13–70.0317%7 May
cache8–13-0.0323%6 May
inferno7–130.0519%3 May
ancient8–130.0831%3 May
nuke13–30.0919%3 May
cache5–13-0.0123%3 May
mirage2–13-0.0357%2 May
cache8–13-0.0913%2 May
cache13–11-0.0217%1 May
cache10–13-0.0728%1 May
cache7–13-0.0416%1 May
cache13–9-0.0433%1 May
cache13–100.0020%30 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →