Tomdidly Utility Retardidly — CS2 Stats

76561198283139947[U:1:322874219]✓ No bans

376Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since

532Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating3.3 Learning

Premier CS Rating4,700Grey band · top ~80.1% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35

Positioning45

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–55–4Last 10041%Win rateWLLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.5

Aggression5.8

Utility4.4

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 674ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5

Positioning4.5

Utility4.4

Mechanics3.9

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time679ms+42ms

first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 679ms

Headshot accuracy14.3%−3.1%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–1Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 15nukeWeakest map · 27% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.01
dust2	D	15	5–10	33%	-0.02
ancient	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.03
nuke	D	15	4–11	27%	-0.04
inferno	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.02
anubis	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.02
cache	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,328Lifetime kills

0.72K/D

673Matches

33.1%Match win rate

41.0%Headshot %

3.3%Shot accuracy

645MVPs

245Hours (in match)

288Bombs planted

99Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-472,267

AWP1,524

M4A4 / M4A1-S1,395

Galil AR454

P2000 / USP-S404

Desert Eagle394

SSG 08225

XM1014207

Nova159

Glock-18155

Lifetime map wins

1,222dust2

763inferno

393nuke

121vertigo

27train

11lake

11safehouse

9sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches

0%Win rate

0.44Avg K/D

57.8ADR

80%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	1	0%	0.14	1.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.74	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy

30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.1%Spray accuracy

67.8%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

674msReaction time

27.4%T opening success

50.5%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

7.42HE damage / grenade

6.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.3855% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.3684% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	16–12	0.01	17%	27 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.01	13%	24 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.01	30%	24 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	23%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–1	-0.06	0%	23 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.01	28%	23 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	18%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.09	13%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	17%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	10%	16 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	9%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	4%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	15%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	14%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	8%	5 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	10%	4 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	5%	4 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	5%	4 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	12%	3 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	19%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.05	25%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	13%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	22%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	13%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	22%	3 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.06	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.02	10%	31 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	3%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	15%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	17%	30 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	10%	30 Jul →
anubis	16–12	-0.03	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	17%	30 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	15%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.01	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	16%	29 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	22%	27 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	26%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.11	8%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.04	20%	26 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.02	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	14%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	14%	26 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.07	8%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	7%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.13	25%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	17%	25 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	9%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.06	17%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	22%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	15%	23 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.12	4%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	19%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	12%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	31%	22 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	26%	22 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	18%	21 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.02	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	33%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	16%	21 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.04	20%	21 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	12%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	9%	19 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	22%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	10%	18 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	25%	18 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	9%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.06	16%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.06	5%	18 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	20%	18 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.09	18%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	19%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.13	17%	18 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	20%	17 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.04	10%	17 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.03	21%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.03	20%	17 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.10	19%	16 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	11%	16 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	9%	16 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	29%	16 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	15%	16 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.06	13%	16 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	12%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	43%	16 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	27%	16 Jul →
nuke	0–13	-0.09	20%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.07	21%	15 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.04	22%	15 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	14%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	11%	14 Jul →