Barq's Root Beer — CS2 Stats

76561198280905873[U:1:320640145]

1,502Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
979Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate49.6%44.0%44.7%above
Shot accuracy2.7%11.6%11.9%9.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.031.04meets
Match win rate36.7%45.1%45.2%8.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBarq's Root BeerFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning48
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateWLWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression5.4
Utility6.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time645ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 9–3
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25151060%-0.00
ancientA1610663%0.00
nukeA138562%-0.00
infernoD134931%-0.02
anubisS139469%0.02
mirageB115645%-0.00
cacheC52340%0.01
overpass31233%0.02
office110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,834Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,627Matches
36.7%Match win rate
49.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
2.7%Shot accuracy
4,389MVPs
979Hours (in match)
840Bombs planted
487Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,839dust2
2,576nuke
1,937vertigo
1,850inferno
424train
159office
46ar_shoots
42ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

278Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7145%0.9914.4
Ancient4860%1.0215.7
Vertigo3956%1.0915.0
Nuke3345%0.9315.6
Anubis2646%0.9514.5
Dust22454%0.9014.6
Inferno1953%0.8614.0
Overpass1377%1.1514.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
645msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.59HE damage / grenade
16.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4654% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0239%16 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0323%15 Aug
nuke13–50.0812%15 Aug
cache7–13-0.0235%9 Jul
dust27–130.0111%9 Jul
ancient13–110.0115%22 Jun
ancient13–100.038%27 May
nuke13–70.0122%23 May
nuke8–13-0.0921%23 May
mirage13–90.0031%23 May
inferno11–13-0.0616%15 May
dust210–13-0.0516%10 May
mirage9–130.0127%4 May
cache8–13-0.0619%2 May
cache5–0-0.0425%2 May
cache9–130.0515%2 May
overpass14–16-0.0322%29 Apr
ancient6–130.0113%29 Apr
cache13–50.1021%28 Apr
dust213–6-0.008%27 Apr
dust210–130.0124%27 Apr
overpass13–110.0711%27 Apr
dust22–130.0120%27 Apr
ancient13–100.0025%26 Apr
overpass15–150.029%26 Apr
mirage13–50.0224%26 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0324%25 Apr
ancient13–90.0613%25 Apr
inferno13–100.0615%25 Apr
dust211–130.0036%25 Apr
dust214–16-0.0117%25 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0426%25 Apr
nuke13–90.0235%25 Apr
dust210–13-0.0317%24 Apr
nuke9–130.0124%24 Apr
dust213–60.0217%24 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0522%24 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0612%23 Apr
dust213–10-0.0210%23 Apr
mirage10–13-0.069%23 Apr
dust24–13-0.0622%23 Apr
dust26–13-0.0216%23 Apr
nuke13–90.0119%22 Apr
dust213–8-0.088%15 Apr
nuke10–130.0326%15 Apr
ancient13–80.0818%14 Apr
ancient13–110.0122%12 Apr
inferno13–80.0015%12 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0814%12 Apr
anubis13–20.0514%10 Apr
dust213–7-0.0222%10 Apr
dust213–80.0028%10 Apr
anubis10–130.0822%10 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0614%10 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0617%10 Apr
dust213–80.0119%10 Apr
dust213–100.0118%10 Apr
nuke13–40.0117%8 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0713%8 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0417%8 Apr
inferno13–90.0813%8 Apr
dust213–70.0225%7 Apr
inferno7–130.0229%7 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0322%6 Apr
dust213–7-0.0222%6 Apr
ancient13–100.1110%6 Apr
ancient13–60.0417%6 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0129%6 Apr
anubis13–80.0413%6 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0722%6 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0020%4 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0721%3 Apr
anubis13–30.0920%3 Apr
anubis13–40.1118%3 Apr
dust216–140.0426%3 Apr
anubis13–40.0225%2 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0012%1 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0715%1 Apr
inferno13–60.0013%31 Mar
mirage7–130.0025%30 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0417%29 Mar
dust213–6-0.0413%29 Mar
anubis13–40.0711%29 Mar
mirage13–90.0418%29 Mar
ancient11–13-0.1025%28 Mar
mirage10–130.0412%28 Mar
inferno9–130.0238%28 Mar
dust213–40.0322%28 Mar
dust213–4-0.0223%28 Mar
anubis13–70.0318%28 Mar
mirage11–130.0018%27 Mar
dust28–13-0.049%27 Mar
inferno4–13-0.087%27 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0315%27 Mar
anubis13–40.0128%27 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0624%27 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0425%25 Mar
office13–6-0.0119%24 Mar
ancient13–80.0429%23 Mar
dust29–30.1231%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →