T Hunts — CS2 Stats

US76561198276643152[U:1:316377424]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,108Tracked matches39%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,188Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,628Purple band · top ~10% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10107 of 22162 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,355 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,628Peak Premier on CSDB

1,355Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,355
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 176 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 19,628
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 372 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	50.4%	46.2%	47.2%	above
Shot accuracy	8.3%	12.5%	12.3%	4.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.00	1.06	1.07	0.07 short
Match win rate	49.0%	45.9%	46.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning55

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–49–6Last 10045%Win rateLWLTWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5

Aggression6.8

Utility5.8

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning5.5

Utility5.8

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time600ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms

Headshot accuracy21.3%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

10Longest win streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	34	17–17	50%	0.04
mirage	C	23	9–14	39%	0.01
inferno	C	16	7–9	44%	0.01
dust2	A	9	5–4	56%	0.00
anubis	D	8	2–6	25%	0.03
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	0.00
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,626Lifetime kills

1.00K/D

2,745Matches

49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players

50.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players

8.3%Shot accuracy

5,979MVPs

983Hours (in match)

2,784Bombs planted

659Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,500

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,531

P2000 / USP-S2,954

Desert Eagle2,580

AWP2,505

Glock-182,304

Galil AR1,095

FAMAS1,011

MAC-10934

MP9765

Lifetime map wins

3,563dust2

3,319inferno

1,431nuke

1,047vertigo

341office

265train

60cbble

52lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

234Matches

53%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

80.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	79	61%	1.20	16.7
Dust2	35	43%	0.97	14.2
Anubis	28	39%	1.18	16.3
Inferno	20	55%	1.00	15.3
Ancient	19	47%	0.99	15.0
Vertigo	16	62%	0.95	13.9
Nuke	9	67%	1.68	13.0
Cache	7	57%	1.21	20.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

80.0%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

598msReaction time

30.6%T opening success

53.8%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

11.03HE damage / grenade

10.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.5998% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	6–13	-0.09	37%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.07	30%	25 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.02	26%	16 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	15%	14 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.07	27%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.04	11%	10 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	18%	9 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.07	26%	8 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.02	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	15%	8 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	27%	8 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	16%	7 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.08	26%	4 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	19%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	25%	1 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.10	26%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	9%	1 Aug →
inferno	1–9	0.01	30%	31 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.01	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	14%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	16%	28 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	17%	28 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.08	29%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.10	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.10	22%	26 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	11%	26 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.06	25%	26 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.07	34%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.03	16%	25 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	18%	23 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	19%	22 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.05	25%	22 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.06	31%	21 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	20%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.01	17%	21 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	22%	21 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	18%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.14	20%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.14	25%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	11%	21 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.06	16%	18 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.05	17%	18 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	29%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	23%	18 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.02	24%	18 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.13	25%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.14	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	21%	17 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	18%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	18%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.01	19%	17 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	10%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.00	33%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	22%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	21%	17 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.01	18%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.04	19%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	27%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.03	28%	16 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	33%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	11%	15 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	21%	15 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	16%	15 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.06	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.02	17%	14 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	26%	14 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.03	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.15	19%	14 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	17%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	16%	14 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	16%	13 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.02	24%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	17%	13 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.01	40%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.02	21%	13 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.10	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	14%	13 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.10	57%	13 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.05	20%	13 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	21%	13 Jul →
office	13–8	0.03	24%	12 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	18%	12 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.04	27%	10 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	21%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	32%	10 Jul →
office	11–13	0.02	18%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.06	19%	9 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	22%	9 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	29%	9 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.09	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	11%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	16%	9 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.07	12%	9 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	20%	9 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.04	32%	8 Jul →