SpennyS — CS2 Stats

76561198275553221[U:1:315287493]

1,722Tracked matches34%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,950Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.3 Developing

FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56

Positioning38

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLLWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6

Aggression2.7

Utility5.4

Positioning3.8

Opening Duels0.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 654ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6

Positioning3.8

Utility5.4

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time647ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms

Headshot accuracy20.2%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — nuke 9–2

13–0Biggest win — inferno

3Longest win streak

L2Current streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	S	18	13–5	72%	-0.01
inferno	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.01
mirage	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.03
nuke	C	12	5–7	42%	0.01
overpass	A	8	5–3	63%	0.06
dust2	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.04
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.04
vertigo	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.03
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.03
poseidon	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.14
sanctum	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,937Lifetime kills

1.02K/D

4,740Matches

37.1%Match win rate

53.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players

14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players

9,454MVPs

1,432Hours (in match)

3,632Bombs planted

805Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,438

AWP10,929

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,855

Desert Eagle6,996

P2000 / USP-S5,224

Glock-181,925

Knife1,874

MP91,413

Galil AR1,289

Tec-91,146

Lifetime map wins

4,159inferno

3,621nuke

2,685dust2

2,424vertigo

2,307train

608office

522cbble

323lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.2%Spray accuracy

76.0%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

654msReaction time

16.2%T opening success

47.6%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

14.7%Flash assists

9.73HE damage / grenade

8.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4941 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 16.2095% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	11–13	-0.04	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.04	30%	13 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.04	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.04	17%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	16%	11 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	28%	17 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.06	24%	29 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.09	17%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	8%	19 Jun →
nuke	7–9	-0.04	8%	18 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.02	17%	17 Jun →
vertigo	8–8	-0.03	25%	8 Jun →
nuke	6–9	-0.02	12%	31 May →
cache	7–13	-0.01	24%	30 Apr →
inferno	9–2	0.06	21%	20 Apr →
anubis	15–15	-0.06	26%	19 Apr →
vertigo	3–9	-0.15	36%	11 Apr →
overpass	9–3	0.20	20%	11 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	21%	7 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.00	17%	6 Apr →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	15%	6 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	18%	6 Apr →
nuke	13–3	-0.02	10%	6 Apr →
vertigo	13–8	0.06	28%	3 Apr →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	17%	3 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	32%	2 Apr →
sanctum	7–9	0.06	20%	31 Mar →
vertigo	9–4	0.20	17%	31 Mar →
inferno	4–9	-0.11	30%	27 Mar →
poseidon	5–9	-0.12	35%	24 Mar →
overpass	9–4	0.27	13%	23 Mar →
nuke	9–2	0.27	26%	23 Mar →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	9%	22 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.01	9%	22 Mar →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	30%	21 Mar →
inferno	9–7	-0.04	28%	20 Mar →
overpass	12–16	-0.01	14%	20 Mar →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	19%	18 Mar →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	9%	18 Mar →
poseidon	3–9	-0.17	36%	15 Mar →
overpass	9–5	0.04	18%	15 Mar →
poseidon	2–9	-0.11	33%	12 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	6%	1 Mar →
sanctum	2–9	-0.11	0%	21 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	17%	20 Feb →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	22%	18 Feb →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	19%	17 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.04	14%	17 Feb →
overpass	11–13	-0.03	13%	16 Feb →
inferno	16–12	0.04	26%	16 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	33%	14 Feb →
ancient	13–5	0.01	33%	14 Feb →
warden	13–5	0.06	16%	14 Feb →
anubis	5–13	-0.08	10%	3 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.00	40%	3 Feb →
ancient	13–8	0.06	17%	3 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	19%	1 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.01	19%	1 Feb →
ancient	13–10	0.00	13%	1 Feb →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	24%	29 Jan →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	21%	27 Jan →
inferno	13–10	0.01	30%	26 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.01	11%	26 Jan →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	16%	23 Jan →
overpass	4–13	-0.05	0%	23 Jan →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	11%	23 Jan →
mirage	10–4	-0.03	0%	22 Jan →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	21%	15 Jan →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	11%	8 Jan →
overpass	13–5	0.05	15%	8 Jan →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	18%	8 Jan →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	21%	7 Jan →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	23%	7 Jan →
nuke	13–7	0.01	33%	6 Jan →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	17%	6 Jan →
inferno	6–13	0.01	32%	5 Jan →
nuke	13–10	0.06	20%	5 Jan →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	21%	3 Jan →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	15%	3 Jan →
train	16–13	0.08	26%	3 Jan →
inferno	9–7	-0.01	13%	1 Jan →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	9%	26 Dec →
inferno	13–0	0.07	50%	26 Dec →
inferno	8–8	0.05	11%	26 Dec →
vertigo	0–9	-0.23	0%	26 Dec →
nuke	2–9	-0.09	20%	26 Dec →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	18%	23 Dec →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	17%	23 Dec →
ancient	13–4	0.03	21%	23 Dec →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	0%	23 Dec →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	19%	20 Dec →
vertigo	13–11	-0.04	14%	20 Dec →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	22%	19 Dec →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	12%	18 Dec →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	13%	18 Dec →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	8%	18 Dec →
nuke	13–7	0.03	26%	17 Dec →
ancient	13–6	0.00	15%	17 Dec →
overpass	13–0	0.02	16%	17 Dec →
train	4–13	-0.02	50%	17 Dec →