SamSoms — CS2 Stats

76561198267583850[U:1:307318122]

248Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
766Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,055Blue band · top ~33.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31684 of 49881 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.9%44.0%44.7%meets
Shot accuracy13.6%11.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.581.031.04above
Match win rate46.8%45.1%45.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSamSomsFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,055 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning68
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44479Last 10044%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3
Aggression8.0
Utility2.8
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.8
Utility2.8
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time560ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 11.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — office 13–2
131Biggest win — ancient
3Longest win streak
W3Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28121643%-0.00
cacheC156940%-0.02
dust2D124833%-0.03
ancientC114736%-0.02
infernoA106460%-0.02
anubisS65183%0.01
nukeD62433%-0.02
officeC52340%0.05
vertigo42250%0.01
overpass2020%-0.01
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,148Lifetime kills
1.58K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
1,362Matches
46.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
43.9%Headshot %
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,875MVPs
766Hours (in match)
1,387Bombs planted
284Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,491dust2
977inferno
555office
323nuke
214assault
207vertigo
161cbble
126train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

79Matches
52%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
76.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2454%1.1515.0
Anubis1354%1.0714.1
Inferno1242%0.9213.8
Ancient1060%1.4216.8
Dust21070%1.2317.2
Nuke425%1.0416.5
Train30%1.3019.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
554msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
3.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.3235% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3926 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4267% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.0619%30 Jul
cache13–70.0713%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0812%26 Jul
cache9–130.0316%26 Jul
inferno9–5-0.0021%24 Jul
inferno9–5-0.0210%24 Jul
cache8–13-0.0022%23 Jul
vertigo7–9-0.0014%23 Jul
overpass6–9-0.0410%23 Jul
anubis13–100.099%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0215%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0119%20 Jul
vertigo13–70.0018%20 Jul
cache4–13-0.0620%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.0312%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0012%20 Jul
office13–70.0616%18 Jul
office13–20.138%18 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0612%15 Jul
mirage13–50.1119%14 Jul
dust23–13-0.0615%14 Jul
ancient13–10.0113%14 Jul
inferno13–1-0.044%14 Jul
ancient13–110.059%13 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0213%13 Jul
dust25–13-0.0519%13 Jul
inferno2–130.0117%13 Jul
nuke13–90.039%12 Jul
office12–120.0314%8 Jul
office8–130.0617%8 Jul
vertigo9–50.1117%14 Jun
nuke4–90.0619%14 Jun
mirage6–130.0511%14 Jun
dust211–13-0.0014%5 Jun
mirage13–80.0321%29 May
anubis13–110.0413%20 May
mirage7–13-0.0019%19 May
ancient6–13-0.055%19 May
mirage13–10-0.0512%19 May
nuke4–13-0.070%18 May
anubis13–8-0.0210%18 May
mirage13–110.019%11 May
cache12–8-0.095%11 May
anubis10–130.0112%9 May
overpass10–130.026%9 May
nuke8–13-0.087%9 May
cache9–13-0.0216%8 May
nuke13–4-0.0627%8 May
mirage4–13-0.046%5 May
cache7–13-0.019%5 May
cache12–12-0.0210%5 May
cache8–13-0.0222%5 May
cache13–11-0.0313%2 May
cache13–10-0.0614%1 May
cache13–5-0.066%1 May
cache4–13-0.0313%1 May
cache8–13-0.069%1 May
inferno13–10-0.0618%26 Apr
mirage13–40.0110%26 Apr
dust213–90.019%26 Apr
office12–12-0.0112%23 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0516%23 Apr
anubis13–11-0.048%23 Apr
dust213–3-0.057%23 Apr
mirage12–120.0314%22 Apr
mirage5–13-0.006%21 Apr
dust213–8-0.0319%21 Apr
dust212–12-0.0410%20 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0217%20 Apr
dust23–130.0113%20 Apr
inferno13–3-0.0124%20 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0916%19 Apr
mirage12–120.006%19 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.087%19 Apr
ancient14–160.009%19 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0219%19 Apr
inferno10–13-0.039%16 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0810%16 Apr
mirage13–60.007%15 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0112%11 Apr
mirage6–5-0.017%11 Apr
mirage3–0-0.030%11 Apr
anubis13–40.0114%11 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0619%11 Apr
ancient15–15-0.037%27 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0412%27 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0414%27 Aug
train13–100.0214%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.086%26 Aug
dust22–130.0317%26 Aug
nuke3–130.015%26 Aug
mirage12–120.1218%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0411%13 Aug
ancient7–10.020%7 Aug
inferno4–9-0.067%7 Aug
inferno13–10.0224%7 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0715%7 Aug
mirage13–110.034%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.1311%5 Aug
dust216–120.0416%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →