roah- — CS2 Stats
76561198258298654[U:1:298032926]✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 40.9% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 16.9% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.20 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 46.4% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.
Areas to improve
Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 27 | 16–11 | 59% | 0.02 | |
| C | 25 | 10–15 | 40% | 0.02 | |
| B | 19 | 9–10 | 47% | 0.01 | |
| S | 10 | 7–3 | 70% | -0.02 | |
| B | 8 | 4–4 | 50% | 0.03 | |
| C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | 0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.00 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.02 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.16 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 168 | 54% | 1.29 | 17.6 |
| Inferno | 73 | 45% | 1.12 | 16.2 |
| Dust2 | 65 | 62% | 1.27 | 17.9 |
| Anubis | 62 | 45% | 1.07 | 16.4 |
| Ancient | 48 | 50% | 1.13 | 16.1 |
| Vertigo | 45 | 47% | 1.40 | 17.9 |
| Nuke | 41 | 66% | 1.42 | 19.5 |
| Overpass | 18 | 44% | 1.01 | 14.6 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.57% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.9068% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6–13 | 0.00 | 19% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.07 | 19% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 13% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 14% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 25–23 | 0.02 | 14% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.06 | 11% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 12% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.00 | 16% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.02 | 10% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.11 | 17% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 11% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 16% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.01 | 16% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 22% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 12% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 15% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 12% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.05 | 15% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 14% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.01 | 17% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 1–6 | 0.04 | 7% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 8% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 6% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.09 | 9% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 23% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 23% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 14% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 20% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 18% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.00 | 18% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.19 | 32% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 26% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 22% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.04 | 28% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 7% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 15% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 14% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.10 | 18% | 20 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 16% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 20% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 25% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.00 | 30% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 16% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 23% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 16% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.04 | 18% | 13 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 9 Jun → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.03 | 16% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 27% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 18% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.04 | 16% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 28% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 15% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 27% | 6 Jun → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.03 | 13% | 31 May → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 24% | 31 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 20% | 31 May → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.02 | 18% | 31 May → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.01 | 21% | 29 May → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 11% | 29 May → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 29 May → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.08 | 41% | 29 May → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 29 May → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.01 | 16% | 28 May → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 32% | 28 May → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 18% | 28 May → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 28 May → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 17% | 28 May → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 15% | 28 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 22% | 28 May → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 21% | 28 May → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 23% | 26 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.00 | 22% | 26 May → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.14 | 18% | 19 May → | ||
| 8–8 | -0.00 | 19% | 19 May → | ||
| 9–3 | 0.16 | 13% | 19 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 15% | 16 May → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 20% | 16 May → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 15% | 16 May → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.10 | 14% | 16 May → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.03 | 15% | 16 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 25% | 9 May → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 19% | 9 May → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 20% | 9 May → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.01 | 5% | 9 May → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.02 | 19% | 9 May → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.07 | 9% | 9 May → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 28% | 9 May → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 22% | 9 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 29% | 8 May → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 35% | 8 May → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 23% | 8 May → |
Match data via Leetify.