Kersh — CS2 Stats

76561198257107821[U:1:296842093]

1,254Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,111Hours in CS63Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 Developing
Premier CS Rating11,917Blue band · top ~44.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17480 of 24776 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate38.4%44.2%44.9%6.5% short
Shot accuracy2.9%11.2%11.8%8.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.791.041.040.25 short
Match win rate41.2%45.3%45.3%4.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKershFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,917 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning52
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53407Last 10053%Win rateLWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression7.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time604ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — nuke 9–0
130Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA22121055%-0.02
nukeA1710759%-0.00
mirageB168850%-0.01
anubisC114736%-0.02
dust2S107370%0.02
infernoD103730%-0.03
ancientA74357%-0.01
trainA53260%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.06
debris110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,679Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
3,439Matches
41.2%Match win rate
38.4%Headshot %
2.9%Shot accuracy
8,042MVPs
980Hours (in match)
2,628Bombs planted
625Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,824dust2
4,400inferno
4,368nuke
1,853vertigo
587train
58office
29ar_shoots
22ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches
57%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
75.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2850%0.6011.3
Mirage475%1.1215.3
Ancient475%1.1619.0
Cache333%0.8915.3
Nuke2100%1.0116.5
Vertigo20%0.8616.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
598msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.02HE damage / grenade
5.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2923% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0126%29 Aug
cache13–00.0524%29 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0012%29 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0118%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0312%28 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0313%28 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0320%28 Aug
anubis13–70.0718%28 Aug
cache13–90.0519%27 Aug
mirage13–70.0514%27 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0318%27 Aug
mirage13–90.0315%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0718%27 Aug
cache13–100.0620%27 Aug
overpass13–9-0.069%27 Aug
dust213–70.0322%27 Aug
cache10–13-0.0114%27 Aug
cache1–13-0.0311%26 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0314%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.0716%26 Aug
ancient13–60.049%26 Aug
cache10–13-0.055%26 Aug
nuke13–80.0117%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0711%25 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0112%25 Aug
nuke9–70.0618%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0511%25 Aug
inferno4–13-0.067%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.0313%24 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0020%23 Aug
dust213–80.0915%23 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0516%23 Aug
cache10–13-0.0618%23 Aug
mirage13–30.0313%23 Aug
inferno13–1-0.0114%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0213%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0821%22 Aug
dust213–50.013%22 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0421%22 Aug
debris9–50.0719%22 Aug
cache5–13-0.0213%21 Aug
inferno13–60.0414%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0614%21 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0413%20 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0433%20 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0612%20 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0416%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0919%19 Aug
anubis14–16-0.049%19 Aug
nuke9–00.2231%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1213%19 Aug
ancient22–19-0.0210%19 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0212%19 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0514%19 Aug
train5–13-0.0118%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.028%19 Aug
cache2–11-0.048%18 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0411%18 Aug
dust213–80.0639%18 Aug
nuke13–60.0130%18 Aug
cache13–60.0124%18 Aug
anubis11–130.0014%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0919%18 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0012%18 Aug
nuke13–10.0429%17 Aug
ancient13–60.0825%17 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0913%17 Aug
dust213–100.0414%17 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0722%17 Aug
train13–11-0.0714%14 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0621%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0422%14 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0819%14 Aug
cache13–4-0.0335%14 Aug
dust213–80.0418%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0322%13 Aug
dust212–120.0123%13 Aug
anubis8–130.0619%13 Aug
cache13–11-0.0518%13 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0314%13 Aug
cache13–70.0112%12 Aug
nuke13–70.0034%12 Aug
cache13–6-0.0417%12 Aug
train9–13-0.077%12 Aug
mirage8–130.0512%12 Aug
train13–11-0.0318%12 Aug
cache7–13-0.048%12 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0913%12 Aug
ancient13–50.0114%12 Aug
mirage10–70.0015%12 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0121%11 Aug
cache12–12-0.0724%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0133%11 Aug
cache13–70.0027%11 Aug
cache7–13-0.0321%11 Aug
cache13–2-0.0221%11 Aug
cache13–3-0.0614%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0711%10 Aug
mirage13–40.0421%10 Aug
train13–20.0418%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →