Pingu med pälsmössan

Pingu med pälsmössan — CS2 Stats

CK76561198255851482[U:1:295585754]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

976Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,493Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,571 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.5%47.2%49.0%11.4% short
Shot accuracy16.0%12.3%13.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.071.08above
Match win rate44.2%46.3%46.9%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPingu med pälsmössanFACEITLevel 8 · 1,571 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning36
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40528Last 10040%Win rateWLLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression4.1
Utility2.6
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning3.6
Utility2.6
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — anubis 13–8
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 12dust2Weakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1991047%-0.01
infernoD1551033%-0.02
anubisB126650%-0.01
ancientB115645%0.01
dust2D91811%0.01
nukeC83538%-0.01
trainC73443%-0.00
overpassD61517%0.01
vertigoD62433%0.04
grail21150%0.04
agency220100%0.01
cache110100%0.00
dogtown1010%0.05
jura110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,697Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,784Matches
44.2%Match win rate
37.5%Headshot %
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
10,676MVPs
1,493Hours (in match)
2,727Bombs planted
983Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,110
AWP10,552
Knife2,735
SSG 081,746
MP91,378
MP71,194

Lifetime map wins

4,950inferno
4,482dust2
1,523nuke
1,167vertigo
620cbble
559train
382lake
293office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

134Matches
52%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
82.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3743%1.1215.2
Inferno2143%1.0513.2
Ancient1878%1.2816.1
Anubis1753%1.3019.0
Dust21338%1.2915.9
Nuke757%1.1114.6
Train667%1.1713.8
Vertigo475%2.0619.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
594msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
30.4%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
6.23HE damage / grenade
2.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3778 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3891% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0020%10 Jul
anubis5–13-0.079%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1022%13 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0316%13 Jun
mirage13–50.0333%21 May
inferno4–13-0.0410%21 May
mirage13–70.1228%2 Apr
dust23–13-0.0617%30 Mar
overpass9–13-0.048%4 Mar
inferno13–0-0.0014%4 Mar
dust24–130.0820%4 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0731%3 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0121%3 Mar
nuke13–100.0112%2 Mar
inferno9–13-0.007%1 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0427%1 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0524%27 Feb
dust216–130.0620%27 Feb
inferno11–130.0215%23 Jan
ancient10–130.0226%28 Dec
mirage13–20.0318%28 Dec
train13–7-0.0326%28 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0222%21 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0135%17 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0419%17 Dec
ancient13–100.0626%17 Dec
dust211–13-0.0321%17 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0331%16 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0626%16 Dec
nuke13–90.0622%16 Dec
train5–13-0.0114%15 Dec
train13–90.0129%15 Dec
overpass15–150.0122%15 Dec
mirage11–130.0222%14 Dec
nuke5–130.0129%14 Dec
overpass11–13-0.0621%14 Dec
overpass13–16-0.0314%14 Nov
vertigo10–13-0.0510%8 Nov
mirage8–130.0022%8 Nov
vertigo14–160.0330%8 Nov
vertigo13–90.0423%26 Oct
grail9–130.0214%20 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0218%29 Aug
inferno16–130.0624%16 Aug
dust27–130.0014%16 Aug
overpass8–130.0423%3 Aug
ancient13–40.0735%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0215%3 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0519%2 Aug
agency13–50.0227%27 Jul
dust212–12-0.0131%27 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0219%11 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0314%11 Jul
nuke12–120.0415%10 Jul
anubis13–80.2224%10 Jul
vertigo10–130.0426%9 Jul
train12–120.0215%9 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0529%9 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0010%8 Jul
dust23–13-0.0014%8 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0223%8 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0541%8 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0319%7 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0426%7 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0510%7 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0416%5 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0311%5 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0618%5 Jul
anubis13–60.0213%5 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0717%5 Jul
nuke0–13-0.110%5 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0724%4 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0318%3 Jul
mirage13–10.0523%3 Jul
train13–4-0.0314%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0214%3 Jul
inferno13–6-0.027%2 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0311%22 Jun
dust212–120.0317%22 Jun
ancient7–130.0419%7 Jun
overpass13–20.1317%28 May
inferno10–13-0.0318%26 May
inferno2–13-0.0414%26 May
ancient13–60.0727%22 May
dogtown8–80.0514%14 May
vertigo9–20.187%14 May
agency13–6-0.0015%9 May
grail13–30.0617%9 May
jura13–60.0311%9 May
inferno13–6-0.0317%9 May
nuke13–6-0.0025%21 Apr
dust28–13-0.0229%21 Apr
train12–12-0.0316%21 Apr
ancient6–130.0126%16 Apr
train9–130.0529%16 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0712%16 Apr
inferno11–130.0216%15 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0213%15 Apr
mirage13–70.0029%11 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0013%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →