^w1 — CS2 Stats

76561198254947000[U:1:294681272]

1,104Tracked matches61%Win rate2023Tracked since

813Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning54

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWWLTWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4

Aggression10.0

Utility5.2

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels4.9

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning5.4

Utility5.2

Mechanics9.0

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time595ms+100ms

first ⅓ avg 496ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms

Headshot accuracy29.9%+9.4%

first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 29.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–1

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

15–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 9% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	18	10–8	56%	0.01
inferno	A	16	9–7	56%	0.03
mirage	C	15	6–9	40%	0.03
anubis	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
nuke	D	11	1–10	9%	0.00
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	0.05
ancient	S	10	7–3	70%	0.04
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (9% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,702Lifetime kills

1.06K/D · Top 50% of tracked players

1,902Matches

47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players

52.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players

7.3%Shot accuracy

4,886MVPs

813Hours (in match)

2,577Bombs planted

516Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,766

AWP6,132

Desert Eagle4,821

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,147

P2000 / USP-S2,095

Glock-181,720

P901,034

SSG 08757

MP7647

Tec-9595

Lifetime map wins

5,823dust2

3,233inferno

1,371nuke

830vertigo

526train

174cbble

168assault

62office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.5%Headshot accuracy

39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.7%Spray accuracy

90.3%Counter-strafing

6.7°Preaim

586msReaction time

48.9%T opening success

50.4%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

8.41HE damage / grenade

8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4651 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

9% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	0.07	28%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.08	43%	17 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	33%	17 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.03	35%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	18%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.16	29%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	30%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.07	41%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	18%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.02	30%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.00	63%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	21%	8 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	29%	7 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.07	12%	27 May →
cache	13–7	0.13	24%	27 May →
cache	13–2	0.07	53%	27 May →
cache	9–13	0.07	56%	23 May →
cache	13–3	0.02	32%	23 May →
anubis	13–5	0.04	29%	23 May →
cache	13–8	0.10	46%	21 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	31%	20 May →
cache	4–13	0.02	37%	20 May →
cache	12–12	-0.00	13%	20 May →
dust2	13–3	0.05	48%	19 May →
cache	11–13	0.06	29%	19 May →
cache	3–13	0.12	26%	19 May →
nuke	5–13	0.05	14%	6 Mar →
overpass	16–14	-0.01	14%	25 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.08	27%	25 Feb →
mirage	11–13	0.08	15%	25 Feb →
nuke	14–16	0.03	28%	25 Feb →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	18%	25 Feb →
inferno	13–6	0.10	19%	25 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.03	17%	24 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.07	14%	24 Feb →
overpass	3–13	-0.01	31%	24 Feb →
ancient	6–13	0.01	18%	23 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.04	19%	23 Feb →
nuke	13–11	0.07	16%	23 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.07	19%	23 Feb →
inferno	13–8	0.14	29%	23 Feb →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	20%	18 Feb →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	22%	18 Feb →
overpass	13–6	0.07	30%	17 Feb →
inferno	13–9	0.05	21%	17 Feb →
nuke	0–13	-0.09	29%	17 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.05	33%	17 Feb →
anubis	13–11	0.03	29%	17 Feb →
mirage	8–13	0.05	26%	17 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.06	45%	17 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	17%	17 Feb →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	25%	17 Feb →
anubis	13–5	0.10	23%	17 Feb →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	16%	17 Feb →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	33%	17 Feb →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	29%	16 Feb →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	35%	16 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.02	29%	16 Feb →
overpass	13–10	0.05	29%	16 Feb →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	33%	16 Feb →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	25%	16 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	25%	16 Feb →
inferno	16–14	-0.05	13%	15 Feb →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	21%	15 Feb →
dust2	10–13	0.01	22%	15 Feb →
anubis	6–13	0.01	15%	15 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.02	28%	15 Feb →
dust2	3–13	-0.00	14%	15 Feb →
mirage	11–13	0.00	24%	14 Feb →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	19%	14 Feb →
anubis	16–12	0.07	13%	13 Feb →
inferno	13–11	0.06	15%	13 Feb →
overpass	13–4	-0.01	24%	13 Feb →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	19%	13 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.10	17%	13 Feb →
inferno	13–8	0.05	27%	13 Feb →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	26%	13 Feb →
overpass	10–13	0.04	26%	13 Feb →
anubis	6–13	0.05	14%	13 Feb →
dust2	16–14	0.01	21%	13 Feb →
inferno	13–2	0.10	26%	13 Feb →
anubis	13–7	0.03	29%	12 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.02	18%	12 Feb →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	23%	12 Feb →
dust2	16–14	0.03	17%	12 Feb →
dust2	6–13	0.01	24%	12 Feb →
inferno	4–13	0.05	33%	11 Feb →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	19%	11 Feb →
nuke	10–13	0.12	15%	11 Feb →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	26%	11 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.04	17%	11 Feb →
dust2	13–3	0.00	13%	11 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.05	16%	11 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.13	27%	11 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	24%	11 Feb →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	16%	11 Feb →
inferno	16–14	0.00	19%	11 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	23%	10 Feb →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	11%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.06	22%	10 Feb →