JxF — CS2 Stats

US76561198240901632[U:1:280635904]Steam profile ↗

1,004Tracked matches59%Win rate2025Tracked since

926Hours in CS52Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,773Purple band · top ~25.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12701 of 20640 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning56

Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression8.8

Utility2.9

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch2.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.6

Utility2.9

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time576ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms

Headshot accuracy25.4%+2.4%

first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — ancient 12–3

13–3Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	19	9–10	47%	0.02
mirage	S	17	11–6	65%	0.01
cache	D	15	5–10	33%	0.02
ancient	B	14	7–7	50%	0.05
inferno	C	13	5–8	38%	0.01
anubis	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
dust2	S	6	5–1	83%	0.00
vertigo	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.00
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.07
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,209Lifetime kills

1.18K/D · Top 25% of tracked players

1,402Matches

56.3%Match win rate · Top 5% of tracked players

47.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players

1.4%Shot accuracy

3,687MVPs

515Hours (in match)

592Bombs planted

242Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,764

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,469

AWP3,415

Desert Eagle1,557

P2000 / USP-S1,137

MP71,027

Glock-18855

MAC-10726

SSG 08670

Galil AR448

Lifetime map wins

2,806inferno

1,738nuke

1,357dust2

854vertigo

154office

100cbble

93train

12italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

51Matches

43%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

91.0ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	12	75%	1.31	19.6
Mirage	9	44%	1.09	15.6
Nuke	7	14%	1.34	19.7
Cache	7	57%	1.03	16.6
Vertigo	5	20%	1.26	29.8
Inferno	5	20%	0.50	10.8
Anubis	4	50%	1.58	19.5
Dust2	2	0%	0.48	8.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy

38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

89.1%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

580msReaction time

32.7%T opening success

59.1%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

3.43HE damage / grenade

4.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.6701% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	3–13	0.03	28%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	32%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	18%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	23%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	16%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	28%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	39%	25 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.06	38%	25 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	29%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.01	26%	25 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	28%	25 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.04	27%	25 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.02	20%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.08	21%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	26%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	11%	24 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	29%	23 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.04	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.09	36%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	16%	23 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.00	23%	23 Aug →
ancient	12–3	0.20	26%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.05	25%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	36%	21 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.14	21%	21 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	39%	21 Aug →
nuke	10–3	0.04	29%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.07	20%	20 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	29%	20 Aug →
vertigo	1–13	-0.10	18%	20 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	17%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.16	24%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.10	22%	19 Aug →
overpass	13–3	-0.03	25%	19 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	25%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	11%	17 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.00	25%	17 Aug →
overpass	11–13	0.06	26%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	10%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	22%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	19%	15 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.14	19%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	28%	14 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.09	21%	14 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	19%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	17%	13 Aug →
train	7–13	0.02	15%	12 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	17%	11 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	27%	10 Aug →
nuke	0–8	-0.01	43%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.03	25%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	19%	10 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	15%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.09	17%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.00	20%	9 Aug →
office	12–12	0.10	22%	9 Aug →
office	13–9	0.05	28%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.08	33%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.07	9%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–16	0.05	17%	6 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.01	10%	6 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	22%	5 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	14%	4 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	25%	4 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.10	25%	2 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.18	21%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	41%	2 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	21%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.11	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.10	15%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	14%	2 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.07	25%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.17	28%	31 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	29%	31 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	23%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.01	24%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.10	18%	29 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.02	23%	29 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.02	24%	29 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.04	27%	28 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	22%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	16%	28 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	22%	28 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	0.05	20%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	24%	27 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.01	20%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	33%	27 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	31%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	16%	27 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	23%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	18%	27 Jul →
cache	12–16	0.02	31%	27 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	8%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	27%	27 Jul →
dust2	6–1	0.06	33%	27 Jul →