The Wok

The Wok — CS2 Stats

US76561198240884564[U:1:280618836]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,552Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,061Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating22,291Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7280 of 25318 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 878 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.6%44.9%46.2%3.7% short
Shot accuracy6.0%11.8%12.5%6.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.041.060.13 short
Match win rate40.5%45.3%45.9%5.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThe WokFACEITLevel 6 · 878 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,291 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning46
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54451Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression5.6
Utility6.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time555ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–5
131Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26111542%0.00
dust2S1914574%0.00
ancientB178947%0.01
nukeC146843%-0.01
infernoC104640%-0.03
cacheS86275%0.02
anubisS65183%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,729Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
3,069Matches
40.5%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot %
6.0%Shot accuracy
6,203MVPs
1,061Hours (in match)
2,513Bombs planted
617Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,724dust2
3,374nuke
3,357inferno
816vertigo
704train
119office
100cbble
32lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

506Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
80.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14954%1.0416.0
Dust28449%0.9814.8
Inferno4556%0.9614.8
Ancient4455%0.9915.7
Nuke3847%0.9815.7
Cache3557%1.0515.7
Anubis2737%1.0515.9
Overpass1567%1.0417.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
559msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
46.1%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
8.95HE damage / grenade
14.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1146% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.1526%29 Aug
nuke13–110.0213%28 Aug
ancient13–60.0515%27 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0322%26 Aug
dust213–100.0114%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.069%26 Aug
anubis13–100.0124%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0112%25 Aug
anubis13–110.0114%25 Aug
ancient13–110.0421%25 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0211%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0328%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0314%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0332%24 Aug
nuke13–90.0331%24 Aug
cache4–13-0.0431%23 Aug
mirage13–50.0119%23 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0034%23 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0616%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0714%23 Aug
dust212–10.0710%23 Aug
ancient13–80.0313%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0314%22 Aug
cache6–130.0218%21 Aug
mirage15–19-0.0520%21 Aug
ancient6–130.0019%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0111%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0515%19 Aug
dust26–130.0021%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0711%17 Aug
dust216–19-0.0122%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0814%16 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0339%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0316%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0533%16 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0214%16 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0019%16 Aug
dust213–10.0118%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0618%15 Aug
inferno13–80.0617%15 Aug
dust213–30.0521%15 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0332%15 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0128%15 Aug
cache13–110.0413%15 Aug
ancient13–70.0824%15 Aug
ancient13–40.0737%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0127%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0426%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0022%15 Aug
nuke13–70.0512%14 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0214%14 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0524%14 Aug
inferno8–130.0011%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0121%14 Aug
dust213–11-0.0219%13 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0314%13 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0419%13 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0629%13 Aug
mirage7–130.0419%13 Aug
mirage22–190.0016%12 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0412%12 Aug
mirage13–90.1115%12 Aug
dust213–50.085%12 Aug
mirage8–130.0119%11 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0418%11 Aug
cache13–90.0218%11 Aug
nuke0–4-0.0060%11 Aug
dust213–100.0112%11 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0423%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0212%10 Aug
cache13–100.0320%10 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0618%10 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0112%10 Aug
dust213–7-0.0212%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0518%10 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0813%10 Aug
mirage13–90.0133%10 Aug
inferno13–100.0017%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0024%10 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0115%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0127%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0126%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.0211%9 Aug
ancient13–100.0419%9 Aug
cache13–80.0216%9 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0318%9 Aug
dust213–16-0.0216%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0411%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0121%28 Jul
anubis8–130.0313%28 Jul
mirage13–40.044%28 Jul
dust213–90.0220%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0415%28 Jul
dust213–8-0.0610%28 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0218%28 Jul
cache13–60.1024%28 Jul
dust213–80.0616%28 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0013%27 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0319%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →