Low Taper Faded

Low Taper Faded — CS2 Stats

76561198217927641[U:1:257661913]Steam profile ↗

400Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
831Hours in CS53Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,080Blue band · top ~43.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15196 of 21572 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLow Taper FadedFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,080 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning48
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53416Last 10053%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7
Aggression5.5
Utility5.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time595ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 9–5
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA23131057%0.00
infernoB23111248%-0.03
dust2A1710759%0.01
ancientB158753%-0.00
anubisC104640%0.00
mirageS96367%-0.01
cache31233%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,925Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
1,219Matches
33.8%Match win rate
41.4%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
1,714MVPs
469Hours (in match)
801Bombs planted
184Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,709dust2
1,146inferno
1,102nuke
224vertigo
208office
59lake
30ar_shoots
29train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
53%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
76.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
55%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2540%0.9419.8
Ancient425%0.9113.0
Nuke4100%1.1016.8
Anubis367%1.2011.7
Mirage250%1.0611.0
Inferno10%1.0814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
602msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
4.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3051% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–130.0427%28 Aug
inferno9–60.0622%28 Aug
ancient13–90.0612%26 Aug
dust213–60.0222%26 Aug
nuke13–110.0216%26 Aug
inferno13–40.0424%26 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1113%24 Aug
anubis7–130.0217%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0928%23 Aug
ancient11–1-0.0113%23 Aug
inferno13–110.0018%23 Aug
dust222–19-0.0115%23 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0421%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0622%21 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0724%21 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0919%21 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0418%21 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0710%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0816%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0419%19 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0720%19 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0624%18 Aug
anubis13–80.0718%18 Aug
anubis15–150.0319%18 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0611%18 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0422%18 Aug
dust29–130.0018%18 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0114%17 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0813%17 Aug
cache13–6-0.0412%17 Aug
nuke16–130.057%17 Aug
nuke10–130.0115%17 Aug
nuke16–140.0211%17 Aug
nuke5–130.0520%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0120%17 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0213%17 Aug
dust213–10-0.0017%17 Aug
ancient13–10.0316%17 Aug
inferno5–13-0.069%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.019%16 Aug
inferno4–9-0.089%16 Aug
inferno0–9-0.250%16 Aug
inferno5–9-0.204%16 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0526%16 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0511%16 Aug
anubis13–90.0610%16 Aug
dust213–110.1122%16 Aug
dust213–90.0017%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0126%16 Aug
cache6–130.0118%16 Aug
ancient9–130.0413%16 Aug
nuke9–50.1411%16 Aug
inferno9–40.1420%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0713%15 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0011%13 Aug
nuke13–50.0211%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.0416%12 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0613%12 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0120%12 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0226%11 Aug
inferno13–40.0217%11 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0422%11 Aug
cache6–130.0511%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.066%11 Aug
dust213–80.0828%10 Aug
dust216–130.0120%10 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0218%10 Aug
nuke13–90.0120%10 Aug
nuke15–150.0710%9 Aug
inferno3–9-0.156%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0312%9 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0214%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0910%9 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0117%9 Aug
ancient16–120.0215%9 Aug
dust23–13-0.048%9 Aug
nuke13–90.007%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.1013%8 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0115%8 Aug
inferno13–70.0012%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0213%7 Aug
nuke1–13-0.094%7 Aug
inferno13–40.0718%7 Aug
dust27–130.008%6 Aug
ancient10–130.0224%6 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0122%6 Aug
inferno13–50.0513%5 Aug
dust213–40.0925%5 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0211%5 Aug
anubis13–4-0.049%5 Aug
inferno13–10-0.027%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0011%5 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0420%5 Aug
ancient13–100.0915%5 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0810%5 Aug
dust213–30.0916%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0213%4 Aug
dust213–110.0815%4 Aug
anubis16–120.0410%4 Aug
nuke13–50.0612%4 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →