Chimod

Chimod — CS2 Stats

US76561198210741896[U:1:250476168]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,584Tracked matches38%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,365Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,340Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1217 of 8284 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,516 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChimodFACEITLevel 8 · 1,516 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,340 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning61
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateLLLLWWWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression9.3
Utility7.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.1
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time521ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 533ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — vertigo 13–8
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 14anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24111346%0.03
cacheC1771041%0.02
infernoA148657%0.03
ancientB147750%0.02
anubisD103730%0.01
dust2C83538%-0.01
nukeA74357%0.02
train31233%0.09
vertigo21150%0.14
debris1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

122,158Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
10,478Matches
67.5%Match win rate · Top 5% of tracked players
43.0%Headshot %
9.2%Shot accuracy
15,254MVPs
2,365Hours (in match)
6,509Bombs planted
1,555Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,165
AWP14,925
P2503,500
MP93,123
MAC-102,683

Lifetime map wins

7,956dust2
6,570inferno
5,715nuke
2,511train
2,436vertigo
898cbble
410office
189italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

168Matches
55%Win rate
1.48Avg K/D
98.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3361%1.4818.9
Ancient1753%1.5419.9
Dust21669%1.5620.2
Inferno1560%2.4519.3
Vertigo1362%1.6920.6
Nuke1060%1.5318.3
Anubis838%1.1517.9
Overpass650%1.8116.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.5%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
531msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
64.1%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
10.99HE damage / grenade
16.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.026% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–160.0024%28 Aug
mirage4–130.0229%27 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0633%25 Aug
anubis11–130.056%24 Aug
mirage13–30.0919%22 Aug
mirage16–120.0514%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0615%22 Aug
cache13–70.0520%22 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0218%21 Aug
train12–120.0615%21 Aug
dust28–130.0222%21 Aug
mirage8–130.0114%20 Aug
cache13–160.0015%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0125%16 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0114%16 Aug
anubis2–4-0.0218%15 Aug
cache3–130.0017%15 Aug
cache16–130.0322%15 Aug
inferno13–70.0419%15 Aug
mirage7–130.0022%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0216%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0410%5 Aug
cache4–13-0.0120%4 Aug
ancient13–90.0120%4 Aug
mirage16–140.0620%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0118%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0118%3 Aug
anubis14–160.0116%3 Aug
cache13–8-0.0511%3 Aug
ancient16–130.0113%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0124%2 Aug
ancient13–110.089%2 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0314%1 Aug
train12–120.0624%1 Aug
vertigo13–80.1923%1 Aug
dust213–70.0420%31 Jul
nuke13–60.0327%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0810%31 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0512%30 Jul
anubis12–160.0211%30 Jul
cache10–13-0.0311%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0114%29 Jul
inferno13–40.0111%29 Jul
dust24–130.0113%29 Jul
cache1–13-0.0211%28 Jul
dust213–70.0315%28 Jul
vertigo10–130.0817%28 Jul
inferno13–70.1119%28 Jul
cache13–110.0513%27 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0111%27 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0320%27 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0129%26 Jul
ancient2–20.0933%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0321%25 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0615%25 Jul
cache16–130.0121%24 Jul
mirage10–130.0312%24 Jul
anubis13–110.048%24 Jul
cache13–80.0119%23 Jul
cache5–130.0313%23 Jul
mirage3–80.1314%23 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0012%23 Jul
ancient7–130.0515%22 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0119%22 Jul
anubis14–160.0110%22 Jul
debris3–9-0.0224%21 Jul
inferno4–130.1024%21 Jul
inferno13–70.0919%21 Jul
mirage7–130.0725%20 Jul
cache8–130.0427%20 Jul
nuke4–130.047%20 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0322%20 Jul
mirage7–130.0315%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0313%20 Jul
nuke13–100.0520%16 Jul
mirage4–130.1023%16 Jul
cache13–110.0819%16 Jul
train13–100.1520%16 Jul
inferno11–130.0918%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0114%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0321%15 Jul
inferno15–150.0826%15 Jul
anubis13–80.0113%15 Jul
cache5–130.1017%14 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0123%14 Jul
ancient9–130.0215%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0214%13 Jul
mirage13–00.0516%13 Jul
cache14–160.0217%12 Jul
inferno13–70.0121%12 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0316%12 Jul
ancient4–130.0422%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.059%12 Jul
nuke13–110.0221%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0818%12 Jul
dust213–30.058%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0213%11 Jul
dust21–13-0.1025%11 Jul
cache3–13-0.0212%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0216%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →