B0T 𝔈𝐬𝒒𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒕𝐞 — CS2 Stats

76561198208553909[U:1:248288181]✓ No bans

1,289Tracked matches29%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,879Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning42
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44506Last 10044%Win rateLLLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression6.2
Utility5.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 47 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time614ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy28.9%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 13–2
130Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 50% over 8infernoWeakest map · 41% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC29121741%-0.00
dust2B1991047%0.02
mirageC1881044%0.01
ancientC94544%-0.01
nukeC94544%0.03
overpassB84450%-0.00
anubis41325%-0.02
italy110100%-0.06
vertigo1010%0.02
cache110100%0.19
warden1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

158,290Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
6,645Matches
42.2%Match win rate
51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
17,641MVPs
2,927Hours (in match)
6,710Bombs planted
1,614Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,431
AWP19,976
FAMAS3,567
P902,205
Tec-92,157

Lifetime map wins

16,675dust2
10,450inferno
1,626nuke
1,375train
1,126cbble
962vertigo
459office
354lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

702Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
83.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4461%1.1017.6
Mirage4358%1.2118.1
Dust23543%1.2118.6
Ancient2055%0.9314.8
Overpass1839%1.1119.7
Nuke1217%1.1217.9
Anubis580%1.5517.4
Cache3100%1.8515.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.3%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
629msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.52HE damage / grenade
6.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3528% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0131%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0228%8 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0331%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0636%17 Jul
inferno13–80.0244%17 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0329%17 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0121%16 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0635%16 Jul
dust213–50.0426%13 Jul
dust211–130.0457%12 Jul
inferno15–150.0326%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0736%11 Jul
dust210–130.0133%23 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0326%23 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0219%23 Jun
anubis5–130.0031%23 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0127%22 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0912%21 Jun
mirage8–130.0120%21 Jun
mirage13–100.0729%21 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0435%20 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0233%13 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0122%10 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0239%8 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0327%8 Jun
inferno7–130.0138%7 Jun
italy10–6-0.0644%7 Jun
vertigo12–120.0232%7 Jun
anubis12–160.0342%7 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0921%6 Jun
mirage1–60.016%6 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0118%6 Jun
dust213–0-0.020%6 Jun
cache13–20.1936%6 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0141%6 Jun
dust210–13-0.0424%5 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0036%30 May
mirage10–13-0.0027%30 May
dust213–80.0534%30 May
ancient13–2-0.0217%24 May
ancient15–150.0023%24 May
overpass13–60.0024%24 May
overpass13–80.0122%14 May
inferno4–13-0.0133%17 Mar
mirage6–00.1523%17 Mar
dust213–100.0524%14 Feb
mirage13–100.0012%27 Jan
inferno13–90.0324%27 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0213%23 Jan
warden11–130.0230%21 Jan
inferno7–130.0213%15 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0513%15 Jan
inferno13–60.0524%15 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0142%12 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0321%7 Jan
overpass15–15-0.0220%6 Jan
mirage13–80.0329%6 Jan
dust210–13-0.0227%3 Jan
ancient13–90.0122%3 Jan
dust28–130.0532%3 Jan
inferno13–70.1019%3 Jan
dust213–8-0.0023%3 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0325%2 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0318%2 Jan
inferno13–16-0.0919%29 Dec
nuke13–80.1240%29 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0325%29 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0318%27 Dec
inferno13–5-0.0518%27 Dec
overpass13–90.0123%18 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0227%13 Dec
dust213–90.0323%12 Dec
nuke7–130.0735%12 Dec
dust210–13-0.0128%11 Dec
inferno13–30.0660%11 Dec
nuke13–50.0527%11 Dec
inferno15–150.0026%10 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0512%6 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0223%29 Nov
nuke13–16-0.0327%27 Nov
ancient13–7-0.0238%10 Nov
inferno13–110.0314%25 Oct
mirage9–70.0422%24 Oct
inferno16–130.0121%20 Oct
dust25–130.0534%9 Oct
inferno4–9-0.1131%9 Oct
nuke11–13-0.0329%9 Oct
dust213–100.0733%4 Oct
dust213–110.0434%4 Oct
inferno9–70.1021%27 Sept
overpass6–130.0433%23 Sept
nuke13–160.0124%21 Sept
dust213–100.0628%21 Sept
mirage15–150.0527%20 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0218%17 Sept
ancient13–60.0929%17 Sept
nuke13–50.0830%16 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0022%16 Sept
dust26–130.0419%16 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0522%14 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →