I'm not shifting I am limping — CS2 Stats

76561198204239916[U:1:243974188]✓ No bans

1,850Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

8,963Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,999Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3214 of 21405 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	51.4%	52.8%	1.4% short
Shot accuracy	18.7%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.96	1.08	0.12 short
Match win rate	45.2%	49.2%	4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning42

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateWWLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.3

Aggression3.7

Utility4.0

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels0.2

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 50 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning4.2

Utility4.0

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels0.7

Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time588ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy19.1%−3.4%

first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — overpass 13–10

13–2Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

3–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	18	9–9	50%	0.01
cache	C	16	7–9	44%	0.01
inferno	D	14	4–10	29%	0.01
mirage	S	12	8–4	67%	0.01
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	0.01
nuke	D	9	2–7	22%	0.04
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	0.04
train	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

220,078Lifetime kills

0.96K/D

6,831Matches

45.2%Match win rate

51.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band

18.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band

16,487MVPs

8,963Hours (in match)

6,093Bombs planted

2,108Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47101,657

M4A4 / M4A1-S47,512

P2000 / USP-S13,834

P2507,956

Galil AR7,234

FAMAS7,045

Desert Eagle6,921

Glock-186,763

Five-SeveN3,777

AWP3,649

Lifetime map wins

14,054inferno

8,295dust2

5,380nuke

4,333vertigo

2,511train

1,993cbble

276office

54safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

796Matches

50%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

69.0ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

8%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	7	43%	1.22	17.0
Dust2	4	75%	0.99	15.5
Inferno	3	0%	0.88	18.3
Anubis	3	33%	0.70	10.7
Overpass	2	100%	1.22	16.5
Vertigo	2	50%	1.02	16.5
Cache	1	0%	0.68	13.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.33	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy

43.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

48.7%Spray accuracy

89.0%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

577msReaction time

26.1%T opening success

35.9%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

5.74HE damage / grenade

3.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.8562 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.0832% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–6	0.07	18%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.07	15%	28 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	9%	28 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	11%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	12%	28 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.00	14%	26 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.10	15%	26 Aug →
overpass	3–13	-0.03	20%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.08	15%	26 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	18%	25 Aug →
dust2	1–10	0.00	27%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	23%	25 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.03	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	28%	25 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.06	30%	24 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.05	30%	24 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.05	28%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	14%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	26%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	24%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
anubis	2–11	-0.07	17%	19 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.04	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	29%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	26%	19 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	7%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	17%	19 Aug →
train	13–3	0.08	23%	5 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	14%	5 Aug →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	10%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.07	28%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.08	18%	5 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.07	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.07	17%	5 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.00	18%	3 Aug →
overpass	13–10	0.16	13%	3 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.07	19%	3 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.05	22%	3 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.01	44%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	23%	28 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.03	23%	28 Jul →
cache	3–1	0.03	30%	28 Jul →
office	13–7	0.07	18%	27 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	14%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.07	15%	27 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.01	25%	26 Jul →
cache	8–5	0.03	26%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	31%	26 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.12	24%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.03	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	27%	21 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.03	20%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	28%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	31%	20 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	22%	20 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	15%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	20%	19 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	10%	17 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	32%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.13	23%	15 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.01	20%	15 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	23%	15 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.04	34%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	18%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	22%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.08	22%	13 Jul →
vertigo	3–13	-0.05	21%	13 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.03	34%	13 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	24%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.13	22%	12 Jul →
overpass	8–13	0.01	15%	12 Jul →
inferno	12–12	-0.03	24%	12 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.01	30%	12 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	28%	7 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	10%	6 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.04	14%	6 Jul →
train	10–13	0.01	24%	6 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.00	26%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	12%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.07	36%	4 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	0.03	18%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.11	31%	4 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.04	35%	4 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.07	18%	30 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.00	15%	30 Jun →
inferno	9–13	0.00	16%	30 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	9%	29 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.03	31%	29 Jun →
train	13–6	-0.02	25%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.01	23%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.10	31%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.03	20%	28 Jun →
overpass	13–2	0.07	14%	28 Jun →