daniel.moore.16144606 — CS2 Stats

76561198203140752[U:1:242875024]✓ No bans

1,997Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,778Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,229Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7335 of 25176 tracked

FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	vs Level 2
Headshot rate	41.5%	42.1%	meets
Shot accuracy	17.4%	12.9%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.17	1.00	above
Match win rate	45.4%	42.9%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 2 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning59

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateWLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression7.2

Utility3.1

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.9

Utility3.1

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time612ms−25ms

first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%−1.9%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 13–4

13–0Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	19	6–13	32%	0.02
nuke	B	19	9–10	47%	0.03
dust2	C	18	7–11	39%	0.03
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	0.02
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	0.02
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	0.03
office	S	7	5–2	71%	0.05
inferno	S	5	4–1	80%	0.12
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	0.07
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

146,124Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 50% of Pink band

6,872Matches

45.4%Match win rate

41.5%Headshot %

17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band

17,668MVPs

2,617Hours (in match)

6,623Bombs planted

2,110Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,938

AWP21,343

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,157

Desert Eagle13,921

P2000 / USP-S12,038

Glock-186,237

SSG 085,747

Galil AR2,930

SG 5532,242

FAMAS2,169

Lifetime map wins

8,897dust2

7,648inferno

7,105nuke

3,260vertigo

2,104office

2,020train

937cbble

279lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.1%Spray accuracy

84.0%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

604msReaction time

31.3%T opening success

48.0%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

9.29HE damage / grenade

2.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4267 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.3232% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	-0.06	18%	27 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	14%	27 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	12%	27 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.05	18%	25 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.02	15%	22 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	29%	19 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.00	5%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.08	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	42%	15 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	0.19	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.07	19%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.19	25%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	16%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.10	20%	10 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	7%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.00	21%	9 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	12%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	15%	8 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	18%	4 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.00	26%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	25%	4 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.02	43%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.04	13%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	8%	3 Aug →
nuke	1–7	-0.01	17%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.02	9%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.12	13%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	12%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	9%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.09	19%	28 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	19%	27 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.02	26%	27 Jul →
overpass	9–13	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.06	24%	22 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.06	13%	22 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.09	12%	21 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.01	9%	21 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	17%	16 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	0.05	8%	16 Jul →
boulder	13–9	-0.07	25%	14 Jul →
office	13–4	-0.08	10%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.08	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	20%	12 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.07	25%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.10	15%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.18	24%	10 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	2–8	-0.05	18%	10 Jul →
cache	8–2	-0.01	31%	10 Jul →
office	7–11	-0.05	33%	3 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	20%	2 Jul →
overpass	13–8	0.06	19%	2 Jul →
office	13–7	0.12	29%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	13%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.05	13%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	8%	27 Jun →
train	11–13	0.07	22%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	9%	25 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.04	23%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–16	0.06	29%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.06	25%	24 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.01	26%	19 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.07	31%	19 Jun →
train	12–12	-0.02	32%	18 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.11	14%	17 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.05	13%	16 Jun →
vertigo	13–5	-0.00	13%	16 Jun →
anubis	13–0	-0.01	15%	15 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.00	20%	15 Jun →
dust2	6–13	0.04	29%	15 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.12	22%	15 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	14%	15 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	13%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.16	33%	12 Jun →
office	13–11	0.13	33%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.14	24%	10 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	15%	10 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	11%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.07	24%	10 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.09	20%	9 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.02	16%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.09	28%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.02	27%	9 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.10	16%	9 Jun →
nuke	12–4	0.08	19%	9 Jun →
inferno	5–13	0.03	14%	8 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	19%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.15	14%	8 Jun →
office	1–13	0.05	26%	8 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.09	12%	8 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	16%	7 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	27%	7 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.08	14%	7 Jun →
office	13–7	0.09	42%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.04	22%	7 Jun →
office	13–2	0.09	27%	7 Jun →
dust2	2–7	-0.04	15%	7 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.04	8%	3 Jun →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price