LilHusky — CS2 Stats
76561198202200004[U:1:241934276]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 9 median | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 41.5% | 49.0% | 52.0% | 10.6% short |
| Shot accuracy | 11.0% | 13.1% | 13.7% | 2.7% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.99 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.09 short |
| Match win rate | 44.8% | 46.9% | 48.8% | 4.0% short |
This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 32 | 20–12 | 63% | -0.00 | |
| A | 31 | 18–13 | 58% | -0.01 | |
| A | 17 | 10–7 | 59% | -0.01 | |
| S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.02 | |
| S | 5 | 4–1 | 80% | 0.01 | |
| — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | 0.00 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.00 | |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (58% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 54 | 52% | 1.01 | 14.4 |
| Dust2 | 29 | 66% | 1.18 | 18.2 |
| Inferno | 23 | 65% | 1.21 | 15.2 |
| Anubis | 13 | 62% | 1.33 | 16.1 |
| Cache | 9 | 89% | 1.02 | 17.2 |
| Nuke | 9 | 44% | 1.28 | 17.0 |
| Overpass | 8 | 62% | 1.52 | 16.9 |
| Vertigo | 6 | 50% | 1.58 | 16.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.3196% — below the 40% mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 27% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 23% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 15% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.00 | 22% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.09 | 16% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 17% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.02 | 31% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.01 | 10% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.06 | 8% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 18–22 | -0.01 | 17% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 25% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.04 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 19% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 17–19 | -0.03 | 21% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 23% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.04 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 22–18 | 0.03 | 18% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 10% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 21% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 26% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 15% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.01 | 16% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.04 | 18% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.00 | 22% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 10% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.08 | 17% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 12% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 10% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 13% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 11% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 56% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 10% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 8% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.07 | 17% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 26% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.05 | 9% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.04 | 8% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.00 | 16% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 18% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 23% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.00 | 17% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 17% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.08 | 31% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.01 | 26% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 26% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 17% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 21% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.01 | 8% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 13% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.07 | 20% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.01 | 19% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.07 | 25% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.04 | 18% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.08 | 18% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 13% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.04 | 38% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 10% | 16 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 13% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.02 | 32% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.07 | 9% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 12% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.02 | 35% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 18% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 9% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.05 | 17% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 15% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.04 | 16% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.03 | 15% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 23% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 21% | 8 Jul → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.02 | 20% | 7 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 13% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.06 | 29% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 33% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 20% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 15% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.07 | 25% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 26% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 16% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 20% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 28% | 3 May → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 19% | 12 Nov → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.09 | 26% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 3–10 | -0.07 | 14% | 4 Nov → |
Match data via Leetify.