Prottozoa

Prottozoa — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198202033068[U:1:241767340]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,082Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,477Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,507Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5003 of 22055 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate38.0%47.2%49.0%11.0% short
Shot accuracy13.8%12.3%13.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.211.071.08above
Match win rate49.0%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGProttozoaFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,507 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning53
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50446Last 10050%Win rateWLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression5.3
Utility2.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.3
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time552ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — cache 13–2
130Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18mirageWeakest map · 46% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24111346%0.00
nukeB1991047%-0.02
anubisB1991047%-0.00
infernoA1811761%-0.01
dust2B63350%-0.01
ancientB63350%0.02
cache42250%0.05
overpass32167%-0.01
office1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,977Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3,593Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
38.0%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,973MVPs
1,477Hours (in match)
4,038Bombs planted
1,102Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,687
AWP13,193
SG 5531,895
SSG 081,541
Tec-91,403
P2501,363

Lifetime map wins

7,988inferno
2,345nuke
2,078dust2
1,330vertigo
1,206train
782cbble
123office
65lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches
55%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
86.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2167%1.3219.1
Anubis1471%1.1619.4
Ancient1242%0.9114.8
Nuke967%1.1615.4
Inferno757%1.0215.6
Dust2520%0.8713.6
Overpass1100%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
553msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
10.23HE damage / grenade
1.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.272 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1044% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0033%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.068%22 Jul
anubis13–00.000%22 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0812%17 Jul
mirage13–50.0822%17 Jul
nuke13–50.0124%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.0011%17 Jul
inferno13–50.0327%17 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0515%17 Jul
nuke0–7-0.0533%16 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0220%16 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0510%15 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0022%15 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0518%15 Jul
cache15–150.0016%10 Jul
nuke13–80.0223%10 Jul
anubis13–110.0522%10 Jul
mirage13–50.1525%10 Jul
dust27–13-0.0621%7 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0322%5 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0015%3 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0211%3 Jul
overpass13–30.0821%3 Jul
ancient16–130.0521%3 Jul
nuke6–130.0425%3 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0320%3 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0515%3 Jul
mirage0–6-0.0938%2 Jul
inferno13–90.0421%1 Jul
anubis10–130.0117%1 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0614%1 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0021%29 Jun
mirage13–00.0413%29 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0022%29 Jun
inferno16–140.0428%29 Jun
anubis13–80.0110%28 Jun
inferno13–40.0723%28 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0115%27 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0113%27 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0235%26 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0627%26 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0121%26 Jun
anubis13–80.0523%26 Jun
mirage8–130.0325%26 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0338%26 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0316%26 Jun
ancient13–70.0325%26 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0117%26 Jun
inferno2–13-0.1023%16 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0228%5 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0110%5 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0314%5 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0116%5 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0811%29 May
anubis13–90.0313%29 May
overpass7–13-0.0424%29 May
inferno11–13-0.0126%29 May
ancient11–130.0319%23 May
mirage13–70.0415%22 May
mirage13–90.0827%22 May
mirage13–90.0513%22 May
anubis13–110.0421%17 May
office10–13-0.0323%15 May
dust25–13-0.0213%15 May
mirage11–13-0.0722%15 May
inferno13–10-0.0423%15 May
nuke13–9-0.0116%9 May
nuke13–70.0216%9 May
cache6–130.0221%8 May
cache13–20.2018%8 May
inferno13–9-0.0328%8 May
mirage5–13-0.0618%8 May
inferno13–110.0717%8 May
anubis5–13-0.0317%8 May
mirage13–2-0.017%24 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0416%24 Apr
dust213–40.0421%24 Apr
inferno11–130.0124%24 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0217%24 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0327%24 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0518%24 Apr
mirage13–70.0119%24 Apr
mirage7–130.0631%22 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0032%22 Apr
mirage15–150.0726%18 Apr
dust213–3-0.029%18 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0122%18 Apr
mirage13–20.0424%18 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0313%17 Apr
inferno13–2-0.0213%17 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0216%17 Apr
ancient8–130.0525%17 Apr
nuke6–130.0616%11 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0615%11 Apr
dust28–13-0.0125%11 Apr
inferno13–90.0535%8 Apr
anubis10–130.0125%2 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0719%2 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0623%2 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0327%28 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →