leoperper csgoskins#cs2.me

leoperper csgoskins#cs2.me — CS2 Stats

US76561198187107537[U:1:226841809]Steam profile ↗

1,296Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,892Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,512Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3796 of 15611 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,735 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGleoperper csgoskins#cs2.meFACEITLevel 8 · 1,735 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,512 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning60
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58366Last 10058%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression8.8
Utility6.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.0
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time539ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–1
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 5infernoWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A30181260%0.01
ancientA1912763%0.01
infernoC1981142%0.03
mirageA1810856%0.03
anubisS550100%0.02
nukeA53260%0.02
cache32167%0.03
overpass1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,529Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
2,337Matches
46.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
43.9%Headshot %
5.9%Shot accuracy
5,369MVPs
1,027Hours (in match)
2,185Bombs planted
572Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

12,714dust2
2,643inferno
1,513nuke
339train
226vertigo
13italy
10lake
3militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

631Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
82.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust219555%1.1516.6
Mirage11852%1.0715.4
Ancient11351%1.1016.9
Inferno9743%1.0515.2
Anubis3944%1.0716.5
Nuke3949%1.0015.1
Train1242%0.9316.5
Vertigo933%0.9614.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
529msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
11.76HE damage / grenade
5.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3305% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.0910%27 Aug
anubis13–30.0426%27 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0524%27 Aug
dust26–130.0117%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0117%23 Aug
dust213–110.0411%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0722%19 Aug
inferno7–130.0311%18 Aug
ancient10–130.0113%17 Aug
inferno13–80.0417%17 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0419%17 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0316%17 Aug
ancient13–160.0314%14 Aug
inferno13–10.1223%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0424%14 Aug
dust213–9-0.0222%14 Aug
inferno13–40.0420%14 Aug
nuke11–130.0113%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0116%5 Aug
dust213–50.0923%4 Aug
ancient13–50.078%4 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0016%3 Aug
mirage11–130.0117%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0919%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0416%3 Aug
dust213–80.0621%1 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0611%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0821%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.0620%29 Jul
anubis13–80.0618%29 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0114%28 Jul
ancient13–8-0.040%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0216%27 Jul
anubis13–110.0217%27 Jul
mirage16–130.0614%27 Jul
ancient9–130.0422%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.047%24 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0619%24 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0027%24 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0312%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0211%22 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0317%22 Jul
dust213–100.0221%22 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0025%21 Jul
dust215–15-0.0119%20 Jul
dust213–4-0.1012%20 Jul
dust213–20.0817%19 Jul
dust213–40.0422%19 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0116%19 Jul
dust213–70.0417%18 Jul
dust214–160.0820%17 Jul
ancient13–30.0918%15 Jul
dust211–130.0218%15 Jul
inferno10–130.0823%11 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0319%11 Jul
dust213–10-0.0327%8 Jul
cache12–10.0819%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.0121%7 Jul
cache13–00.0227%7 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0511%2 Jul
dust213–50.0424%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0319%1 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0216%30 Jun
mirage13–110.0115%25 Jun
mirage13–50.1112%24 Jun
inferno13–60.0217%24 Jun
dust213–40.0620%24 Jun
anubis13–50.0411%21 Jun
ancient13–60.0716%21 Jun
inferno8–130.0030%21 Jun
dust20–13-0.0319%18 Jun
mirage10–130.0518%18 Jun
dust216–120.0519%18 Jun
dust29–130.0130%18 Jun
inferno13–90.0828%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0118%13 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0611%10 Jun
dust28–130.0015%10 Jun
inferno12–160.0517%9 Jun
inferno16–130.0520%9 Jun
dust26–4-0.0238%9 Jun
dust213–8-0.006%9 Jun
mirage13–110.1222%8 Jun
nuke13–110.0225%8 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0317%8 Jun
nuke13–80.1119%8 Jun
inferno11–130.0910%8 Jun
inferno9–20.1121%8 Jun
ancient16–140.0116%8 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0710%8 Jun
ancient9–130.0420%7 Jun
dust212–16-0.0119%7 Jun
ancient16–140.0222%5 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0415%5 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0110%4 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0022%4 Jun
dust213–40.0120%4 Jun
dust213–70.0124%3 Jun
mirage13–20.1218%3 Jun
dust26–13-0.0618%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →