✡ bosh ✡ — CS2 Stats

AU76561198187011163[U:1:226745435]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

485Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,043Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating9,389Light Blue band · top ~57.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#38134 of 52354 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Light Blue band median	Blue band median	vs Blue band
Headshot rate	49.5%	39.7%	41.4%	above
Shot accuracy	14.6%	6.7%	9.0%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.87	0.91	0.97	0.10 short
Match win rate	34.4%	42.1%	43.7%	9.3% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning44

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–53–5Last 10042%Win rateLLLTLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression4.3

Utility3.4

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels1.9

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 690ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning4.4

Utility3.4

Mechanics9.3

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time699ms−6ms

first ⅓ avg 706ms → last ⅓ avg 699ms

Headshot accuracy20.9%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–7

13–3Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	43	17–26	40%	-0.00
inferno	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.01
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.00
cache	D	9	3–6	33%	0.01
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.03
dust2	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,958Lifetime kills

0.87K/D

2,569Matches

34.4%Match win rate

49.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Light Blue band

14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Light Blue band

3,447MVPs

1,043Hours (in match)

1,405Bombs planted

361Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,428

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,233

AWP4,853

Desert Eagle3,519

P2000 / USP-S2,603

Glock-181,814

Galil AR1,002

Knife925

MP9892

SSG 08795

Lifetime map wins

7,250dust2

1,349inferno

715train

353nuke

94cbble

85bank

29office

28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.2%Spray accuracy

92.0%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

690msReaction time

25.8%T opening success

49.2%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

1.4%Flash assists

7.46HE damage / grenade

4.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.37 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.7777% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	3–13	-0.04	13%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	14%	4 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	16%	3 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	18%	3 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.08	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	30%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	20%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	18%	2 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	17%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.04	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.09	26%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	20%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	26%	30 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.04	30%	30 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	33%	29 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.01	19%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.05	25%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	24%	27 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.00	18%	27 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	20%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.03	16%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.00	32%	24 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	3%	20 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	33%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	32%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	10%	16 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.00	14%	15 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	27%	15 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	30%	15 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	16%	14 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.00	25%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	16%	14 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	21%	13 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.08	23%	13 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.01	26%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	26%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	14%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.00	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.02	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	16%	12 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	10%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	17%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	25%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	23%	11 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	16%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	31%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	29%	11 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.05	23%	11 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	27%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	28%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.06	13%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	28%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.10	27%	10 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	26%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.00	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	37%	10 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.01	26%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	22%	4 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	17%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.00	26%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.05	19%	4 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	8%	4 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	17%	4 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	25%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.13	24%	2 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	38%	11 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.07	17%	11 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	11%	11 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.02	38%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.06	30%	10 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	24%	10 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	35%	1 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.08	34%	31 May →
inferno	0–11	-0.08	8%	31 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	32%	29 May →
mirage	13–3	0.01	31%	14 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	22%	14 May →
mirage	9–13	0.06	16%	13 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	16%	13 May →
nuke	0–13	-0.10	13%	13 May →
mirage	13–7	0.05	18%	13 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	19%	12 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	17%	11 May →
nuke	13–8	0.02	22%	11 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.09	15%	7 May →
overpass	5–13	-0.09	5%	7 May →
mirage	13–16	-0.07	10%	28 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.02	19%	28 Apr →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	35%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	16%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	15%	24 Apr →