AnDeRsSoN200 — CS2 Stats
76561198182425887[U:1:222160159]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 34.5% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 14.1% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.16 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 51.7% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Effective flashesHigh utility contribution
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.
Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.
Areas to improve
Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 22 | 11–11 | 50% | 0.04 | |
| B | 20 | 9–11 | 45% | 0.02 | |
| A | 18 | 10–8 | 56% | 0.04 | |
| A | 18 | 11–7 | 61% | 0.05 | |
| C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | 0.03 | |
| S | 7 | 5–2 | 71% | 0.04 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.07 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.03 | |
| office | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.17 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anubis | 139 | 65% | 1.41 | 18.5 |
| Mirage | 111 | 47% | 1.19 | 16.4 |
| Ancient | 102 | 60% | 1.28 | 18.7 |
| Inferno | 91 | 54% | 1.38 | 18.7 |
| Vertigo | 69 | 61% | 1.41 | 17.3 |
| Dust2 | 64 | 42% | 1.18 | 16.9 |
| Nuke | 41 | 56% | 1.24 | 17.5 |
| Cache | 13 | 46% | 1.10 | 16.8 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.9647% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.9078% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 17% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 16–19 | 0.02 | 19% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 12% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 17% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 9% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.03 | 11% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 12% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 17% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 17% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 16% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 2–4 | 0.07 | 35% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.03 | 22% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 20% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.21 | 15% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 7% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 20% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 13% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 9% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 12% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.05 | 11% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 17% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 15–19 | 0.05 | 9% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 18% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 19–16 | 0.01 | 11% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 11% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 13% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 11% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 9% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 18% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 10% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 7% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.10 | 20% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 10% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 12% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.04 | 21% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 8% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 13% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 14% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.05 | 11% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.01 | 13% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 15% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 13% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.06 | 18% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.08 | 14% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 3–2 | -0.03 | 14% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.19 | 15% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 13% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 19% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.07 | 14% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.11 | 13% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 16% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 14% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.00 | 15% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 18% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 12% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.00 | 15% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.16 | 14% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.03 | 12% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 15% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.02 | 13% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.14 | 15% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 14% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.09 | 16% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.09 | 13% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 6% | 19 Jul → | ||
| office | 13–2 | 0.17 | 20% | 7 Jul → | |
| 13–3 | 0.13 | 14% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 14% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 9% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.04 | 16% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 10% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.08 | 20% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.18 | 15% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.10 | 21% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.06 | 16% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.04 | 17% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 6% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 17–19 | -0.04 | 11% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 21% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.12 | 13% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 8% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 11% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.10 | 7% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 23% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.10 | 10% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.09 | 6% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 8% | 21 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.08 | 14% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.13 | 14% | 16 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.05 | 11% | 16 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.