Jim Beam

Jim Beam — CS2 Stats

US76561198181842757[U:1:221577029]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

342Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,179Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,350Purple band · top ~23% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10258 of 16965 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJim BeamFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER16,350 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning72
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56395Last 10056%Win rateLLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3
Aggression9.5
Utility4.7
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning7.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time516ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — inferno 9–4
132Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 20dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB21111052%0.04
mirageS2014670%0.05
nukeC145936%0.06
infernoS128467%0.09
ancientA116555%0.05
anubisB84450%0.05
dust2D72529%0.02
debris32167%0.11
vertigo220100%0.06
poseidon110100%0.14
eldorado110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,630Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
1,372Matches
43.1%Match win rate
43.2%Headshot %
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
3,361MVPs
529Hours (in match)
1,509Bombs planted
332Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,247dust2
1,265inferno
876nuke
311office
161train
132vertigo
99lake
16italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
0%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke20%1.4025.0
Mirage20%1.0618.0
Ancient10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
44.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
89.7%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
533msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
14.2%Flash assists
15.81HE damage / grenade
3.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4666 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.467% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–13-0.039%21 Aug
cache9–130.0013%7 Aug
mirage7–130.0220%26 Jul
cache13–90.0918%25 Jul
anubis13–110.0720%25 Jul
dust216–120.0513%25 Jul
debris9–40.2312%25 Jul
poseidon9–50.1453%25 Jul
nuke7–130.0724%25 Jul
mirage13–80.1027%25 Jul
nuke10–130.0926%25 Jul
cache3–13-0.0519%25 Jul
dust211–130.0126%24 Jul
mirage13–60.0912%23 Jul
ancient13–40.1225%23 Jul
cache14–160.0229%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0219%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0417%22 Jul
cache15–15-0.0611%22 Jul
mirage16–130.0524%20 Jul
inferno13–80.1415%20 Jul
ancient8–130.1212%20 Jul
inferno13–70.0415%20 Jul
cache13–50.0913%20 Jul
dust22–110.000%19 Jul
inferno13–80.1118%19 Jul
cache12–160.0319%19 Jul
ancient13–100.0512%19 Jul
ancient6–130.079%18 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0019%18 Jul
nuke3–13-0.075%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0718%18 Jul
nuke13–100.089%18 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0012%18 Jul
nuke7–130.0930%18 Jul
mirage15–150.1012%18 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0212%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0817%17 Jul
mirage4–130.0617%17 Jul
cache13–60.1029%16 Jul
ancient5–13-0.022%16 Jul
cache13–80.0917%16 Jul
mirage13–50.1011%16 Jul
anubis13–70.1314%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0515%16 Jul
inferno9–40.2426%16 Jul
ancient13–40.0315%15 Jul
cache13–60.0812%15 Jul
dust22–13-0.0213%15 Jul
dust22–13-0.0420%15 Jul
ancient7–130.000%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0312%14 Jul
cache13–80.0514%14 Jul
nuke9–130.0223%14 Jul
nuke15–150.0224%14 Jul
dust20–10-0.0119%14 Jul
inferno13–100.0116%14 Jul
cache13–70.0131%14 Jul
cache3–130.0319%12 Jul
mirage13–20.1638%12 Jul
vertigo9–70.1315%12 Jul
eldorado9–70.1012%12 Jul
debris9–5-0.0114%12 Jul
inferno13–70.1221%12 Jul
inferno8–80.0612%12 Jul
nuke13–90.0318%12 Jul
inferno9–130.097%12 Jul
dust216–120.1718%12 Jul
cache13–60.1313%12 Jul
anubis11–130.1012%12 Jul
inferno7–130.1313%12 Jul
nuke13–50.2216%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0317%12 Jul
nuke9–130.0722%12 Jul
anubis13–70.1713%12 Jul
nuke8–130.0316%12 Jul
cache13–50.0919%11 Jul
inferno13–60.1015%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0214%11 Jul
nuke7–00.1019%11 Jul
mirage5–130.0415%11 Jul
ancient16–120.0619%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0519%11 Jul
cache7–13-0.0821%11 Jul
mirage13–70.026%11 Jul
ancient9–130.0619%10 Jul
mirage13–110.0216%10 Jul
mirage13–100.065%9 Jul
debris8–80.118%9 Jul
cache8–13-0.0223%9 Jul
cache10–130.0722%8 Jul
vertigo13–8-0.0117%8 Jul
cache9–30.0622%8 Jul
cache8–13-0.027%7 Jul
cache13–100.1326%6 Jul
ancient16–120.0319%6 Jul
nuke13–110.0710%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0012%6 Jul
anubis9–130.0121%1 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0326%1 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →