BrettYaBiceps — CS2 Stats

76561198181701543[U:1:221435815]

907Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,089Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,723 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.9%47.0%48.5%above
Shot accuracy17.2%12.7%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.070.09 short
Match win rate43.0%46.4%47.0%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrettYaBicepsFACEITLevel 8 · 1,723 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning46
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateLWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression4.6
Utility3.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.6
Utility3.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time638ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — inferno 13–2
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%-0.02
dust2B168850%-0.02
infernoC1661038%-0.03
ancientD1441029%-0.01
nukeC83538%-0.00
overpassA53260%-0.03
train440100%-0.02
anubis330100%-0.04
fachwerk110100%-0.05
boulder1010%-0.02
grail1010%0.02
office1010%0.06
basalt1010%0.00
edin1010%-0.02
palais1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

118,861Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
4,616Matches
43.0%Match win rate
49.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
17,131MVPs
2,693Hours (in match)
5,062Bombs planted
1,841Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,280
AWP20,921
MP92,113
MAC-101,941
Knife1,633
P2501,361

Lifetime map wins

13,983dust2
9,469inferno
1,511nuke
1,313cbble
1,177train
1,124vertigo
103office
70lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

875Matches
51%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
69.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5848%0.8914.5
Mirage5654%0.8914.7
Ancient2934%0.7612.7
Dust22857%0.9415.3
Nuke2564%0.9014.1
Vertigo2250%0.8414.6
Anubis1850%0.7914.5
Overpass1233%0.8213.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
27.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.2%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
643msReaction time
22.7%T opening success
54.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
4.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4764 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.7283% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0320%10 Jul
fachwerk13–9-0.0511%10 Jul
boulder11–13-0.0228%10 Jul
dust213–60.0124%5 Jul
dust213–11-0.0317%5 Jul
dust213–80.0424%4 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0720%26 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0914%21 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0423%6 Jun
overpass13–90.0521%6 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0437%6 Jun
dust22–13-0.0835%14 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0032%12 Apr
ancient13–100.0220%9 Apr
dust27–13-0.0534%9 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0125%30 Jan
dust210–13-0.0532%12 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0522%11 Jan
dust213–5-0.0529%11 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0519%3 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0721%2 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0319%2 Jan
train13–7-0.0328%2 Jan
train13–7-0.0523%25 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0616%20 Dec
dust213–11-0.0027%3 Nov
mirage10–13-0.068%25 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0330%24 Oct
mirage9–13-0.0123%24 Oct
mirage13–5-0.0016%24 Oct
mirage13–2-0.0228%22 Oct
ancient9–13-0.0416%12 Oct
mirage13–11-0.0331%11 Oct
nuke5–13-0.0319%11 Oct
mirage13–90.0217%11 Oct
dust216–14-0.0922%10 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0415%9 Oct
dust216–120.0110%9 Oct
inferno13–60.0116%9 Oct
nuke13–10-0.0116%7 Oct
ancient13–10.0617%7 Oct
mirage10–00.0428%7 Oct
overpass11–13-0.0322%5 Oct
dust213–90.0428%5 Oct
mirage13–4-0.0128%5 Oct
inferno13–5-0.0327%4 Oct
ancient15–15-0.0620%4 Oct
mirage16–14-0.0121%2 Oct
overpass7–13-0.0515%2 Oct
mirage3–13-0.0416%21 Sept
grail12–120.0219%19 Sept
mirage13–90.0327%19 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0026%21 Aug
inferno13–20.1124%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0727%19 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0530%18 Aug
ancient13–110.0220%18 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0222%18 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0229%17 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0933%17 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0221%16 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0231%16 Aug
overpass13–11-0.0618%16 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0432%16 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0315%4 Jul
dust211–13-0.039%4 Jul
inferno13–60.0535%4 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0411%4 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0138%16 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0326%15 Jun
dust210–130.0134%15 Jun
anubis13–8-0.027%15 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0119%12 Jun
nuke13–100.0328%12 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0115%11 Jun
mirage9–130.0119%7 Jun
anubis8–40.0136%7 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0229%23 May
ancient12–12-0.0226%18 Apr
office10–130.0620%18 Apr
basalt11–130.009%18 Apr
edin12–12-0.0215%18 Apr
dust25–130.0313%16 Apr
ancient13–50.0517%16 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0815%13 Apr
train13–50.0219%13 Apr
inferno4–13-0.1127%13 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0510%7 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0412%7 Apr
train13–8-0.0318%6 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0213%6 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0022%6 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0718%5 Apr
dust24–13-0.0215%3 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0413%3 Apr
ancient8–130.0521%2 Apr
palais7–90.0520%2 Apr
mirage13–110.0117%27 Mar
mirage13–60.0515%23 Mar
nuke7–130.0717%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →