MidgetSlayer — CS2 Stats

76561198178630806[U:1:218365078]

1,261Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,779Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.9 Learning
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.6%46.2%47.2%1.5% short
Shot accuracy8.0%12.5%12.3%4.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.061.070.13 short
Match win rate46.4%45.9%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMidgetSlayerFACEITLevel 7 · 1,430 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning41
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateLLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression4.9
Utility6.3
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 647ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time643ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–8
133Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB23111248%-0.01
dust2B2091145%-0.03
mirageA1811761%0.00
ancientB178947%0.00
infernoC146843%-0.02
anubisC52340%-0.01
overpass21150%0.03
cache1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,794Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,140Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
45.6%Headshot %
8.0%Shot accuracy
4,853MVPs
835Hours (in match)
2,255Bombs planted
470Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,398
AWP2,796
MAC-101,815
MP91,696
SSG 081,273
P901,140

Lifetime map wins

5,216dust2
2,469nuke
1,971inferno
1,476vertigo
886train
101cbble
22office
20lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
25%Win rate
0.68Avg K/D
60.8ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1100%2.1713.0
Anubis10%0.397.0
Dust210%0.142.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
28.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.5%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
647msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
9.31HE damage / grenade
14.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2342% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–130.0526%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0119%23 Aug
dust213–16-0.0329%17 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0220%17 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0113%17 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0615%15 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0120%15 Feb
overpass13–50.0515%15 Feb
dust213–7-0.0719%15 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0110%15 Feb
ancient13–90.0311%15 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0117%12 Feb
inferno15–150.0126%12 Feb
nuke1–13-0.057%12 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0515%12 Feb
anubis4–130.0012%12 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0619%12 Feb
mirage8–130.0013%11 Feb
nuke11–130.0222%11 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0322%11 Feb
dust28–13-0.0610%11 Feb
ancient7–130.0018%10 Feb
inferno13–40.0530%10 Feb
dust213–70.0312%10 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0623%9 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0115%9 Feb
dust213–100.0124%9 Feb
nuke13–50.0317%9 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0637%9 Feb
mirage13–100.0329%8 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0522%8 Feb
nuke13–80.1124%7 Feb
inferno13–110.0512%7 Feb
dust215–150.0015%7 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0117%7 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0118%6 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0018%6 Feb
dust27–13-0.0513%6 Feb
anubis13–100.0518%6 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0113%6 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0412%6 Feb
mirage2–13-0.084%5 Feb
ancient10–130.0923%5 Feb
dust213–7-0.0119%5 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0629%5 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0416%5 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0311%5 Feb
dust213–100.0721%5 Feb
mirage13–100.0132%5 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0414%4 Feb
mirage7–130.0914%4 Feb
ancient13–80.1125%4 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0623%4 Feb
dust24–13-0.0519%4 Feb
dust213–30.0229%4 Feb
inferno11–130.0030%4 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0214%3 Feb
mirage3–130.0524%3 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0130%3 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0425%3 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0318%2 Feb
mirage13–40.0038%2 Feb
nuke4–13-0.1013%2 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0216%1 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0118%1 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0118%1 Feb
ancient13–90.0219%1 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0113%1 Feb
ancient13–110.0121%1 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0612%1 Feb
nuke13–40.0029%31 Jan
inferno13–5-0.0238%31 Jan
nuke13–30.0620%31 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0622%31 Jan
ancient16–12-0.0415%30 Jan
mirage13–30.0021%30 Jan
dust29–13-0.0620%29 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0315%28 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0226%28 Jan
nuke13–50.0415%28 Jan
nuke11–130.0120%28 Jan
dust25–13-0.0615%28 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0929%27 Jan
dust213–7-0.1113%27 Jan
dust27–13-0.0124%27 Jan
dust213–11-0.029%26 Jan
dust213–80.0526%26 Jan
nuke10–130.0720%26 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0525%26 Jan
dust22–13-0.0917%26 Jan
mirage13–80.0417%26 Jan
nuke13–11-0.039%26 Jan
nuke7–130.0116%25 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0317%25 Jan
mirage13–30.0616%25 Jan
ancient15–150.0432%25 Jan
nuke13–60.0138%25 Jan
anubis2–130.0118%25 Jan
overpass6–130.0127%25 Jan
dust213–16-0.0421%25 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →