noha

noha — CS2 Stats

76561198175078653[U:1:214812925]Steam profile ↗

980Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,711Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,121Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2849 of 35982 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

26,121Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,121
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,879 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate48.0%44.9%46.2%above
Shot accuracy16.3%11.8%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.041.06meets
Match win rate48.2%45.3%45.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 7 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnohaFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER26,121 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning55
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51427Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression6.5
Utility2.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch6.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.5
Utility2.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time594ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–1
130Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2071335%-0.01
infernoC1761135%0.00
ancientS1711665%0.01
nukeA159660%-0.00
mirageA138562%0.01
anubisA74357%-0.02
overpassC52340%-0.05
cache220100%-0.02
vertigo21150%-0.03
train110100%0.02
debris1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,248Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
3,322Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
48.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
9,494MVPs
1,464Hours (in match)
1,732Bombs planted
649Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,991
AWP7,828
P2501,413
FAMAS1,219
UMP-451,018
MP9954

Lifetime map wins

3,819inferno
2,853dust2
2,324train
1,665nuke
1,359cbble
605vertigo
130lake
66safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

139Matches
58%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
83.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1030%1.0617.0
Dust2633%0.9818.2
Anubis560%1.0914.4
Ancient475%1.3417.5
Inferno3100%1.9222.3
Nuke20%0.538.5
Cache2100%0.9118.0
Vertigo1100%1.3312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
569msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
2.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4434 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7155% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.0426%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0714%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0019%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0214%28 Aug
ancient16–130.1021%28 Aug
cache16–13-0.0123%27 Aug
dust216–190.0217%27 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0721%27 Aug
cache13–7-0.049%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0212%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0118%24 Aug
mirage13–160.0422%24 Aug
dust213–100.0322%24 Aug
ancient13–10.0716%17 Aug
vertigo13–40.0127%17 Aug
nuke8–80.0529%15 Aug
nuke9–6-0.0724%15 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0715%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0730%14 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0856%14 Aug
overpass0–4-0.240%13 Aug
vertigo3–9-0.0728%13 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0922%13 Aug
inferno9–5-0.1027%11 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0710%11 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0733%8 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1040%8 Aug
inferno9–30.0177%8 Aug
train13–90.0244%7 Aug
inferno9–10.2123%7 Aug
inferno8–80.2027%7 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0619%7 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0714%4 Aug
nuke9–70.0827%4 Aug
inferno3–90.0520%4 Aug
debris8–8-0.0415%4 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1557%4 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0044%4 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0435%5 Jul
ancient13–100.0432%30 Jun
dust213–80.0540%30 Jun
mirage1–130.0119%29 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0318%26 Jun
nuke13–00.000%26 Jun
dust213–6-0.0020%23 Jun
mirage13–40.0635%23 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0327%22 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0019%22 Jun
overpass9–2-0.025%22 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0222%22 Jun
ancient13–20.0526%22 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0132%17 Jun
ancient16–130.0017%16 Jun
mirage13–20.1035%16 Jun
inferno10–130.0323%15 Jun
overpass13–4-0.0011%15 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0422%15 Jun
ancient13–10.0323%13 Jun
dust213–9-0.0110%13 Jun
ancient10–130.0916%13 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0822%13 Jun
nuke12–12-0.0426%12 Jun
nuke13–60.1327%12 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0413%11 Jun
dust25–12-0.0615%11 Jun
inferno13–70.0629%11 Jun
nuke13–100.0528%10 Jun
mirage13–90.0119%10 Jun
dust215–15-0.0320%10 Jun
ancient13–60.058%10 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0136%9 Jun
dust213–110.0416%9 Jun
dust23–60.0722%9 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0514%9 Jun
anubis13–20.0420%9 Jun
dust25–13-0.0520%9 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0325%8 Jun
dust23–13-0.1017%8 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0323%8 Jun
ancient13–70.0323%8 Jun
mirage13–40.0416%8 Jun
mirage13–80.0522%8 Jun
dust26–13-0.0815%8 Jun
dust27–13-0.0424%8 Jun
dust23–13-0.0612%6 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0129%6 Jun
dust211–130.0120%6 Jun
inferno9–130.0118%6 Jun
ancient12–12-0.0410%6 Jun
dust216–130.0122%5 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0413%5 Jun
inferno13–50.0514%5 Jun
overpass11–130.0220%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.0413%5 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0321%5 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0318%5 Jun
dust213–50.0021%4 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0248%4 Jun
nuke12–160.0120%4 Jun
nuke13–30.0921%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →