djhujweed — CS2 Stats

76561198173983063[U:1:213717335]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

983Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,893Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	33.3%	42.2%	42.7%	9.4% short
Shot accuracy	14.6%	11.9%	10.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.98	0.98	1.00	meets
Match win rate	42.1%	43.6%	44.1%	2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning48

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–49–6Last 10045%Win rateLWWWLTWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1

Aggression3.9

Utility4.7

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels0.2

Clutch7.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning4.8

Utility4.7

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels1.0

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time556ms−50ms

first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms

Headshot accuracy22.7%−0.0%

first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–8

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

4Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	36	16–20	44%	0.02
vertigo	A	14	9–5	64%	0.02
dust2	C	14	5–9	36%	0.02
anubis	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.01
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,215Lifetime kills

0.98K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players

4,690Matches

42.1%Match win rate

33.3%Headshot %

14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players

10,632MVPs

1,860Hours (in match)

3,268Bombs planted

773Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,865

SSG 0820,748

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,630

AWP10,830

P2000 / USP-S6,428

Desert Eagle5,733

Glock-183,994

P2502,197

P902,143

FAMAS1,556

Lifetime map wins

7,382dust2

2,828inferno

2,596nuke

1,958train

1,215vertigo

522cbble

186lake

137safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches

60%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

85.4ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

57%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	22	64%	1.17	16.6
Anubis	15	87%	1.13	15.3
Nuke	6	67%	0.92	15.0
Inferno	4	50%	1.35	15.8
Dust2	4	25%	0.85	14.8
Ancient	2	50%	0.76	12.5
Train	1	100%	1.45	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy

32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.4%Spray accuracy

76.5%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

544msReaction time

23.1%T opening success

38.2%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

9.98HE damage / grenade

8.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4185 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.1423% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	-0.02	22%	30 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.05	43%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	26%	30 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.02	32%	30 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.06	22%	29 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.07	25%	29 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	23%	29 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	0.02	18%	29 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.09	11%	28 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.03	24%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	22%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	29%	28 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	12%	23 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	21%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	21%	22 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	19%	22 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.01	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	22%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	12%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	60%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	34%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.05	16%	5 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	9%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.01	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	14%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.07	18%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	22%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	30%	30 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.08	34%	30 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.06	18%	17 Jul →
shelter	13–6	0.02	31%	17 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.11	24%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	17%	17 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	21%	17 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	19%	13 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	20%	11 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	14%	11 Jul →
nuke	4–4	-0.05	25%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	22%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	13%	7 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.04	11%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.09	14%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.06	23%	6 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	0.03	29%	6 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	18%	2 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	21%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	18%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	4%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	15%	1 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	19%	1 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.07	20%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	13%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	14%	24 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	21%	24 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	21%	24 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.01	18%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.01	18%	22 Jun →
nuke	1–7	-0.09	29%	22 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	13%	16 Jun →
anubis	4–13	0.01	23%	16 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.06	17%	15 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.07	33%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.03	21%	13 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	27%	13 Jun →
mirage	9–6	0.07	21%	12 Jun →
vertigo	13–1	0.08	19%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.08	19%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.09	18%	11 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.04	27%	11 Jun →
anubis	12–12	0.01	29%	10 Jun →
vertigo	13–5	0.08	25%	9 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.04	16%	9 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.01	21%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	0.06	21%	8 Jun →
dust2	3–0	-0.03	25%	8 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	20%	8 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.04	24%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.05	14%	7 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	15%	7 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.03	25%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.15	27%	1 Jun →
anubis	5–13	0.06	25%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.08	33%	1 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.02	23%	31 May →
vertigo	3–11	-0.09	23%	29 May →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	22%	29 May →
cache	13–2	0.11	21%	29 May →
mirage	13–9	0.03	21%	29 May →
mirage	6–10	0.09	20%	29 May →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	21%	28 May →
mirage	13–9	0.06	17%	28 May →
cache	4–13	-0.02	14%	27 May →
nuke	13–3	0.11	23%	27 May →
anubis	13–11	0.08	16%	27 May →
vertigo	13–6	0.03	30%	26 May →
nuke	13–7	0.00	44%	26 May →
mirage	4–10	-0.03	28%	25 May →