svtSandman

svtSandman — CS2 Stats

US76561198172915542[U:1:212649814]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

377Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
675Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate47.8%44.0%44.7%above
Shot accuracy12.6%11.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.031.040.04 short
Match win rate40.1%45.1%45.2%5.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsvtSandmanFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning48
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY494110Last 10049%Win rateLTWLLWLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression5.4
Utility3.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning4.8
Utility3.2
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy30.5%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 33.7% → last ⅓ avg 30.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — office 13–11
131Biggest win — vertigo
9Longest win streak
23In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

italyBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB41212051%0.02
dust2D123925%-0.01
nukeD82625%-0.02
anubisB84450%-0.00
vertigoS75271%-0.00
cacheD62433%0.00
italyS54180%-0.03
alpine440100%0.01
ancient31233%-0.04
mirage21150%0.11
train1010%-0.05
warden110100%0.02
stronghold110100%-0.02
inferno1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,544Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
1,059Matches
40.1%Match win rate
47.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1,441MVPs
376Hours (in match)
794Bombs planted
118Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,786dust2
2,088office
616inferno
586nuke
162vertigo
133italy
34train
24cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
50%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
70.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.6%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.6%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
576msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
6.99HE damage / grenade
2.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.399 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8915% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office7–13-0.0444%31 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0321%31 Aug
office13–70.0545%30 Aug
office3–13-0.0522%30 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0240%25 Aug
office13–90.0533%24 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0619%21 Aug
cache13–90.0332%21 Aug
mirage12–120.1441%20 Aug
office13–80.0433%11 Aug
office8–13-0.0330%17 Jul
office9–130.0849%17 Jul
dust28–130.1229%16 Jul
office9–13-0.0228%16 Jul
office13–100.0843%16 Jul
office7–130.0143%16 Jul
office5–00.1333%16 Jul
nuke12–120.0734%15 Jul
office12–12-0.0315%15 Jul
office13–50.0239%15 Jul
office4–13-0.0335%10 Jul
office13–30.0223%10 Jul
office13–7-0.0229%6 Jul
italy13–8-0.0632%6 Jul
vertigo13–100.0224%6 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0124%28 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0426%28 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0622%26 Jun
anubis13–80.0431%26 Jun
office13–80.0728%26 Jun
dust22–9-0.0020%26 Jun
cache4–13-0.0320%26 Jun
train7–13-0.0519%25 Jun
office6–130.0350%25 Jun
office13–100.0323%25 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0539%25 Jun
vertigo13–5-0.0724%25 Jun
dust213–10-0.0819%25 Jun
cache13–70.0527%25 Jun
italy13–6-0.0213%24 Jun
alpine13–10-0.0440%24 Jun
vertigo13–9-0.0415%24 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0310%24 Jun
ancient12–12-0.0319%24 Jun
office13–10-0.0418%24 Jun
dust26–130.0526%22 Jun
anubis13–30.1123%22 Jun
dust212–12-0.0828%22 Jun
anubis13–20.0029%20 Jun
cache8–13-0.0330%20 Jun
office11–13-0.0441%18 Jun
office13–60.0350%18 Jun
office13–30.0138%18 Jun
vertigo13–20.0340%17 Jun
office13–40.0927%17 Jun
alpine13–7-0.0225%17 Jun
vertigo13–10.0650%17 Jun
italy13–3-0.0223%17 Jun
warden13–60.0230%17 Jun
stronghold13–9-0.0221%17 Jun
office2–130.0848%16 Jun
italy13–9-0.0132%13 Jun
alpine13–60.1527%13 Jun
office13–110.1660%13 Jun
vertigo8–130.0330%13 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0544%13 Jun
office5–13-0.0346%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0525%13 Jun
office13–7-0.0463%13 Jun
office13–90.0548%11 Jun
office8–130.0534%11 Jun
dust28–13-0.0231%11 Jun
office9–13-0.0050%9 Jun
anubis7–13-0.045%9 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0224%9 Jun
vertigo7–13-0.0716%9 Jun
office9–130.0431%9 Jun
italy12–12-0.0418%9 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0458%9 Jun
alpine13–7-0.0426%9 Jun
dust213–90.0317%9 Jun
office10–13-0.0642%8 Jun
cache12–12-0.0128%7 Jun
office10–13-0.0138%7 Jun
dust211–13-0.0220%7 Jun
cache6–130.0235%5 Jun
office13–20.0257%5 Jun
dust210–13-0.0026%5 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0026%5 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0118%5 Jun
dust213–9-0.0520%5 Jun
office10–13-0.0432%5 Jun
office13–90.0175%4 Jun
office6–13-0.0238%4 Jun
dust212–120.0336%4 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0525%4 Jun
mirage13–40.0827%4 Jun
office8–130.0638%3 Jun
office13–50.0127%3 Jun
office13–6-0.0957%1 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →