Mediocre Beans — CS2 Stats

76561198170870761[U:1:210605033]✓ No bans

446Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
702Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate40.0%42.7%44.0%4.0% short
Shot accuracy12.9%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.001.03above
Match win rate44.0%44.1%45.1%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMediocre BeansFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning63
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41518Last 10041%Win rateLTLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression8.5
Utility3.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.3
Utility3.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time632ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — nuke 9–4
132Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB22101245%-0.02
nukeC1771041%-0.01
overpassA117464%-0.02
dust2D103730%-0.02
mirageD92722%-0.02
trainS96367%0.03
infernoC83538%-0.03
anubisD8080%-0.02
cache21150%-0.03
shelter1010%-0.05
office110100%0.02
agency110100%0.06
palacio1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,554Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
1,937Matches
44.0%Match win rate
40.0%Headshot %
12.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,886MVPs
702Hours (in match)
1,990Bombs planted
439Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,081
AWP2,970
MAC-101,270
MP91,173
AUG1,113
SSG 081,060

Lifetime map wins

1,427dust2
1,407inferno
1,150vertigo
1,144nuke
516train
228office
226cbble
200lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches
49%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.2ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%1.1820.5
Inferno250%1.2722.5
Nuke2100%1.0814.0
Train1100%1.1515.0
Anubis10%0.6911.0
Vertigo1100%2.5025.0
Mirage1100%2.1415.0
Dust210%0.7613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
627msReaction time
45.9%T opening success
57.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
6.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0920%16 Jul
shelter12–12-0.057%16 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0114%9 Jul
cache13–110.0316%29 Apr
office13–70.0215%28 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0319%22 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0524%19 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0511%15 Apr
dust213–11-0.0816%13 Apr
mirage12–160.0012%28 Jan
inferno16–13-0.0217%24 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0514%19 Jan
train11–130.0515%18 Jan
nuke8–13-0.066%19 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0120%18 Nov
ancient13–70.0017%18 Nov
train15–15-0.0013%18 Nov
overpass13–9-0.0316%17 Nov
dust211–13-0.0130%17 Nov
inferno13–7-0.0213%17 Nov
overpass13–90.0513%17 Nov
ancient13–70.0215%15 Nov
nuke13–30.0312%15 Nov
overpass5–130.0219%15 Nov
nuke13–60.0617%15 Nov
dust210–13-0.0212%14 Nov
overpass10–13-0.0418%12 Nov
nuke13–10-0.0116%12 Nov
mirage15–15-0.0519%11 Nov
ancient2–5-0.0817%10 Nov
dust27–13-0.0527%10 Nov
nuke9–40.0922%5 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0423%5 Nov
inferno8–13-0.0424%3 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0622%3 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0215%3 Nov
ancient12–2-0.027%3 Nov
overpass13–6-0.0728%2 Nov
train13–80.0623%2 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0117%2 Nov
nuke11–130.0328%2 Nov
inferno9–13-0.097%31 Oct
ancient13–7-0.0020%31 Oct
dust27–130.0015%29 Oct
train13–100.0915%29 Oct
nuke5–13-0.035%28 Oct
dust213–100.0118%28 Oct
train13–50.0526%28 Oct
ancient13–10-0.0315%28 Oct
dust29–13-0.0118%27 Oct
nuke6–13-0.0120%27 Oct
mirage13–6-0.0212%27 Oct
train5–130.0114%27 Oct
inferno10–13-0.0610%24 Oct
overpass13–11-0.0116%24 Oct
ancient4–130.0120%22 Oct
ancient7–130.0611%21 Oct
mirage6–130.0422%21 Oct
inferno6–13-0.014%20 Oct
inferno16–13-0.0028%17 Oct
overpass13–9-0.0113%17 Oct
overpass7–13-0.0817%16 Oct
ancient13–7-0.0215%16 Oct
nuke7–13-0.0510%12 Oct
mirage10–13-0.0422%11 Oct
overpass13–7-0.0518%11 Oct
train13–5-0.0515%11 Oct
ancient13–20.0014%11 Oct
ancient7–130.0117%10 Oct
nuke11–130.0218%8 Oct
ancient13–8-0.037%8 Oct
train16–14-0.029%7 Oct
nuke15–15-0.0111%6 Oct
overpass13–50.0314%6 Oct
agency13–100.0618%5 Oct
palacio12–12-0.0222%2 Oct
nuke8–13-0.0812%2 Aug
dust213–80.0311%2 Aug
nuke1–13-0.069%29 Jul
anubis9–130.0118%14 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0436%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.0610%11 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0916%11 Jun
anubis9–130.0216%7 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0711%7 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0715%5 Mar
anubis14–160.0314%4 Mar
dust27–13-0.039%4 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0210%4 Mar
ancient8–130.0313%4 Mar
train13–40.0621%3 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0722%2 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0112%2 Mar
ancient13–40.059%2 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0615%2 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0118%2 Mar
anubis6–13-0.018%28 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0415%27 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0011%25 Feb
nuke13–3-0.0010%25 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →