BRISK-MEAT — CS2 Stats

US76561198170096823[U:1:209831095]Steam profile ↗

1,906Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,207Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating3.6 Learning

Premier CS Rating12,555Blue band · top ~41.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#32649 of 48495 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

12,555Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 12,555
Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,445 to go
Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	36.6%	44.7%	46.1%	9.5% short
Shot accuracy	9.8%	11.9%	12.6%	2.8% short
Kill/death ratio	0.94	1.04	1.05	0.12 short
Match win rate	44.9%	45.2%	45.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35

Positioning47

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.5

Aggression5.5

Utility5.0

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch0.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5

Positioning4.7

Utility5.0

Mechanics2.0

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact6.1

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time627ms+26ms

first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms

Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–9

13–0Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L5Current streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 20% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	23	14–9	61%	0.02
dust2	A	18	11–7	61%	0.02
cache	C	15	6–9	40%	0.00
anubis	D	15	3–12	20%	-0.01
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.01
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,292Lifetime kills

0.94K/D

3,650Matches

44.9%Match win rate

36.6%Headshot %

9.8%Shot accuracy

6,474MVPs

1,582Hours (in match)

3,419Bombs planted

1,124Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,930

AWP12,004

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,250

P2000 / USP-S3,633

Glock-183,154

Desert Eagle1,987

MP91,802

Galil AR1,667

SSG 081,569

FAMAS1,276

Lifetime map wins

7,520dust2

2,466nuke

1,754inferno

1,245vertigo

472train

51cbble

28office

9lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

71Matches

49%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

71.1ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	27	41%	1.05	15.0
Inferno	11	64%	0.96	14.2
Ancient	10	50%	0.82	13.4
Dust2	8	62%	1.03	15.3
Nuke	6	33%	1.24	15.0
Anubis	5	80%	0.97	13.8
Overpass	2	50%	0.95	16.0
Train	1	0%	0.57	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.2%Spray accuracy

59.1%Counter-strafing

10.9°Preaim

635msReaction time

23.7%T opening success

44.3%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

2.5%Flash assists

8.70HE damage / grenade

7.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6036% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.461 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.6908% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	8–13	-0.01	21%	20 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	15%	17 Aug →
cache	2–5	0.09	15%	1 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.00	0%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	15%	31 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	17%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	8%	30 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.00	2%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.09	13%	29 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	13%	29 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.04	5%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	12%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.09	8%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	11%	28 Jul →
nuke	1–5	-0.07	4%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.07	8%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.04	5%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	10%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	28 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.00	26%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.01	100%	28 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.00	10%	27 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	12%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	9%	27 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.00	4%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.14	13%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.19	15%	26 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.09	7%	26 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	20%	26 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.06	30%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.06	19%	25 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	11%	25 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	15%	25 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.04	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.11	16%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.10	24%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.08	20%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.07	15%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.05	14%	24 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.11	18%	24 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	23%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.02	8%	24 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.01	13%	24 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	18%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	40%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.04	40%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	20%	24 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	24%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	21%	23 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	10%	23 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.08	18%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.05	18%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	1–6	-0.12	13%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.10	8%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–10	0.07	25%	23 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	21%	23 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.04	5%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	13%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.05	8%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.06	28%	22 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.00	0%	22 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.01	13%	22 Jul →
anubis	12–16	0.06	14%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	19%	22 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	13%	22 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	24%	22 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	14%	21 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.02	25%	7 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	9%	7 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.03	11%	7 Jul →
anubis	1–5	0.00	0%	3 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	16%	3 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	24%	3 Jul →
anubis	12–16	0.00	12%	2 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.06	20%	2 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	9%	1 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	10%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	19%	1 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	8%	1 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.02	12%	1 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	9%	1 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.01	12%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.03	22%	30 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.11	12%	30 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	6%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	16%	30 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.03	11%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.02	15%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	4%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	22%	30 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.02	19%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	15%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.02	19%	29 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	15%	29 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.00	12%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.08	14%	29 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	16%	29 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	14%	28 Jun →