bEhY-- — CS2 Stats

76561198158878415[U:1:198612687]

756Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,334Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning36
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47521Last 10047%Win rateLWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression1.8
Utility5.3
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning3.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time606ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — train 13–1
131Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
913In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 24anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA24141058%-0.00
dust2C2281436%-0.01
infernoB179853%-0.01
cacheB126650%0.01
ancientB105550%0.01
anubisD61517%-0.02
nuke42250%-0.01
overpass41325%0.01
train110100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

114,678Lifetime kills
0.44K/D
7,667Matches
45.8%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot %
17.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
14,110MVPs
2,439Hours (in match)
3,247Bombs planted
1,416Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,011
AWP12,414
P909,453
Tec-92,605
P2502,302

Lifetime map wins

9,316dust2
6,386inferno
1,528train
842nuke
652cbble
124vertigo
85office
43safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

301Matches
55%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7560%1.1815.4
Inferno5560%1.2116.7
Ancient5446%1.0215.2
Anubis4657%1.0315.9
Train2564%1.1115.1
Dust22357%0.9714.0
Cache1250%1.0616.7
Nuke50%0.7512.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
600msReaction time
18.8%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
13.7%Flash assists
11.18HE damage / grenade
3.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1111 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.8011% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.059%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.0217%15 Aug
inferno13–60.0521%15 Aug
anubis14–160.0020%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0611%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.037%15 Aug
cache11–13-0.0014%7 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0023%7 Aug
anubis13–90.0216%7 Aug
cache10–13-0.0322%7 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0014%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0619%7 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0625%20 Jul
ancient6–130.0216%28 May
cache11–130.0222%4 May
mirage9–130.0328%4 May
ancient16–140.0515%3 May
inferno3–13-0.0614%3 May
mirage9–13-0.0116%27 Apr
ancient4–130.0246%27 Apr
inferno13–110.1124%27 Apr
dust24–130.066%27 Apr
mirage13–20.0411%26 Apr
cache16–140.0515%26 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0420%26 Apr
dust29–13-0.0016%26 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0114%26 Apr
cache11–130.0423%25 Apr
dust211–13-0.0313%25 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0723%25 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0714%25 Apr
dust213–9-0.0215%25 Apr
cache13–7-0.0220%25 Apr
cache9–130.0419%25 Apr
anubis10–13-0.038%24 Apr
dust216–14-0.0519%24 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0122%24 Apr
dust213–6-0.0118%24 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0122%24 Apr
cache7–13-0.0120%24 Apr
cache13–60.0212%24 Apr
cache13–30.0522%24 Apr
mirage20–22-0.049%23 Apr
mirage16–130.0013%23 Apr
dust24–13-0.0325%23 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0310%23 Apr
cache13–100.0123%23 Apr
inferno1–13-0.0619%23 Apr
dust216–14-0.0312%15 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0418%15 Apr
mirage13–70.0115%15 Apr
inferno15–150.0113%14 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0611%14 Apr
ancient13–90.0412%13 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0017%13 Apr
inferno12–20.0532%13 Apr
mirage13–70.0019%13 Apr
dust25–13-0.0519%13 Apr
dust216–13-0.0016%5 Apr
dust213–60.0623%5 Apr
dust213–10.0515%5 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0315%5 Apr
dust23–13-0.0715%5 Apr
mirage8–130.028%2 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0313%2 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0219%1 Apr
mirage13–100.0225%1 Apr
inferno13–90.0610%1 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0319%1 Apr
mirage13–20.0424%29 Mar
mirage13–100.0119%28 Mar
inferno13–70.0126%28 Mar
dust213–7-0.0129%28 Mar
inferno13–20.0020%27 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0129%27 Mar
dust211–130.0420%1 Feb
ancient13–40.0830%1 Feb
mirage11–130.0314%1 Feb
dust24–130.0114%13 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0124%13 Jan
ancient16–14-0.0219%13 Jan
dust29–13-0.0013%6 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0017%3 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0220%3 Jan
dust24–13-0.0419%18 Dec
overpass13–110.0017%15 Dec
dust211–13-0.0333%15 Dec
nuke13–80.0114%3 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0529%3 Dec
dust29–130.0324%26 Nov
train13–10.1614%26 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0233%26 Nov
nuke13–100.009%23 Nov
inferno6–13-0.0229%6 Nov
inferno12–16-0.0222%30 Oct
overpass10–130.0717%30 Oct
mirage13–60.0219%30 Oct
inferno3–8-0.069%29 Oct
dust23–13-0.0521%29 Oct
mirage13–70.0620%29 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →